Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suggestions for Improvement of Performance Assessment according to Achievement Evaluation

성취평가 시행에 따른 수행평가 내실화 방안

  • Received : 2014.01.12
  • Accepted : 2014.02.26
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to search for the ideal role and performance assessment(PA) in the current school system of Korea, and then to propose some suggestions to improve PA, based on the previous research. The result of the study is presented below. The direction of PA application in school was made to follow the theoretical meaning of PA, to solve the problems related ti its adoption in school, and to help teachers educate students more effectively. The main goal of PA application in term of 'school education' is to help students learn more effectively. That is, the assessment is not only for the evaluation, but also for improving students' learning. PA can be used to assess students' strength and weakness in terms of their academic achievement of various fields of the subject. Also, PA can be used to assess students' academic achievement as an alternative method to the multiple-choice test. Finaly, the results of this study propose some suggestions about how to conduct PA in school to the stakeholders such as educational authorities, schools, teachers, students and parents.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, H. S.(2000). Theoretical Foundations of performance assessment, Seoul: Hakjisa
  2. Baek, S. G.(1997). Theory & Practice of performance assessment. Korean Research Society for Educational Evaluation, Academic seminar published thesis, 3-44.
  3. Baek, S. G.(1999). Practice Plan of Educational Evaluation for Settlement of performance assessment, KICE seminar sourcebook.
  4. Baek, S. G.(2002). Performance Assessment: Theoretical dimensions, Seoul: Kyoyukguahaksa.
  5. Blum, R. E. & Alter, J. A.(Eds.)(1996). A Handbook for Student performance assessment in an Era of Restructuring, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandia, Virginia.
  6. Choi, H. S.(1999). Obstructive factor analysis & improvement plan of curriculum & performance assessment, Korean Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 153-184.
  7. Eylon, B. S. & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education, Review of Educational Research, 58(33), 252-301.
  8. Hur, K. C.(1999). Curriculum Implementing plan for Settlement of performance assessment, KICE. CRE 99-52
  9. Ji, E. L.(2011). Drections & tasks for criterionreferrenced evaluation adoption in middle & high school, KEDI. Educational policy network, OR 2011-02-1.
  10. Kim, M. S.(2001). Management of value & qulity for performance assessment. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 14(20, 17-46.
  11. Kim, M. S.(2008). Connections of Curriculum, Teaching-Learning & Evaluation: Seminar for Innovation of Teaching-Learning, KICE, ORM 2008-18.
  12. Kim, S. H.(1993). An exploration on userbility of cognitive psychological educational mesurement for new educational evaluation, The Journal of Korean Education, 20, 131-143.
  13. Kim, S. H.(2006). Educational sifnificance of performance assessment & multiple-choice test, Research on Educational Problem in Korea, 17, 37-54.
  14. Kim, S. W.(1999). An alternative approach on essential & current issue of performance assessment, Educational Research, 9, 101-116.
  15. McTighe J. & Ferrara S.(1994). Assessing learning in the classroom, Washinton, D.C.: National Education Association.
  16. Nam, M. H. et. al.(2000). performance assessment.: Understanding & Application. Seoul: Moonumsa.
  17. Nam, M. H.(1995). Research on Validity of performance assessment, Korea Univ. Doctoral Dessertation.
  18. Park, D. S. et al.(2011). Educational Evaluation, Seoul: Moonumsa.
  19. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context, New York: Oxford University Press.
  20. Seo, J. Y. et al.(2008). Research on the improvement of performance assessment for more effective school education in Korea(I), KICE. RRE 2008-1.
  21. Seo. J. Y. et. al.(2010). Improvement plan for field applecation of performance assessment, KICE. ORM 2010-4-2.
  22. Seo, M. W.(2001). Analysis of problem & obstacle factors on school application of performance assessment, Journal of Educational Evaluation, 14(1), 47-80.
  23. Seong, T. J.(1999). Essential & strenth-weakness of performance assessment: Analysis of problem & cause, and method of solution, Korea National Univ. of Education. 'Educational innovation grand-debate forum' published thesis.