DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Social Cohesion of Public Rental Housing Residents in Seoul - Community Activities and Cultural Influences -

서울시 공공임대아파트 커뮤니티의 사회적 결속력에 관한 연구 - 단지 내 커뮤니티 활동과 주거문화 특성을 중심으로 -

  • Seo, Bokyong (Department of Urban Planning and Design, The University of Hong Kong)
  • 서보경 (홍콩대학교 도시계획.설계학과)
  • Received : 2013.12.30
  • Accepted : 2014.03.27
  • Published : 2014.04.25

Abstract

In line with the previous study on the level of social cohesiveness of public rental housing communities in Seoul, this study investigated the community activities as a result of community cohesiveness and identified the cultural influences on the cohesiveness of the same case study areas. In general, there was relatively more active and voluntary participation of the residents in the community activities in the housing estates with higher social cohesiveness. The four communities were active in reporting community problems to the housing managers, greatly relying on the housing managers to solve the problems. In addition, mutual aid and community self-help were facilitated mainly through the activities of women's associations. However, small membership of community organisations and occasional disputes between the community organisations and estate managers, and among the community organisations themselves, seemed to have hampered the positive effects of the social cohesiveness in the case study areas. In terms of the cultural attributes, coexistence of collectivism and individualism, consideration of neighbourliness as an ideal social norm, incorporation of the neighbourhood environment into the housing estate environment and extensive use of outdoor public spaces were found.

Keywords

References

  1. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social Cohesion as an Aspect of the Quality of Societies: Concept and Measurement. Mannheim: Centre for Survey Research and Methodology.
  2. Berry, J., Portney, K. & Thomson, K. (1991). The Political Behavior of Poor People. In C. Jencks & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), The Urban Underclass. Washington, D.C.: The Bookings Institution.
  3. Bramley, G. & Power, S. (2009). Urban Form and Social Sustainability: the Role of Density and Housing Type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33129
  4. Buckner, J. (1988). The Development of an Instrument to Measure Neighborhood Cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(6), 771-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930892
  5. Cho, E. (2007). A Study n Community Solidarity of Residents in Permanent Rental Apartment. Unpublished Master Dissertation. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  6. Choi, J. (2005). Dissatisfaction and Recognition Evaluation on the Permanent Rental Apartment Housing. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 21(12), 235-246.
  7. Dekker, K. (2007). Social Capital, Neighbourhood Attachment and Participation in Distressed Urban Areas. A Case Study in The Hague and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 22(3), 355-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701254103
  8. Durkheim, E. (1979). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
  9. Forrest, R. & Kearns, A. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125-2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087081
  10. Friedkin, N. (2004). Social Cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110625
  11. Friedrichs, J. & Blasius, J. (2003). Social Norms in Distressed Neighbourhoods: Testing the Wilson Hypothesis. Housing Studies, 18(6), 807-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303032000135447
  12. Galabuzi, G. & Teelucksingh, C. (2010). Social Cohesion, Social Exclusion, Social Capital. Brampton: Region of Peel Human Services.
  13. Ha, S. & Seo, J. (2006). Public Rental Housing and Social Exclusion. Housing Studies Review, 14(3), 159-181.
  14. Hannerz, U. (1969). Soulside: Inquiries into Ghetto Culture and Community. New York: Columbia University Press.
  15. Hong, I., Nam, W., Kim, S., Kim, Y., Shin, M. & Lee, H. (2005). Investigation of Living Condition of Permanent Rental Housing. Gwacheon: Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation.
  16. Hulse, K. & Stone, W. (2006). Housing, Housing Assistance and Social Cohesion. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
  17. Jackson, A., Fawcett, G., Milan, A., Roberts, P., Schetagne, S., Scott, K. & Tsoukalas, S. (2000). Social Cohesion in Canada: Possible Indicators, Highlights. Kanata: Canada Council on Social Development.
  18. Jung, B. (2011). A Dead Elderly Found After Ten Days. Retrieved from http://www.idomin.com/news/articleView. html?idxno=359095 (21/09/2011, Kyungnam Domin Ilbo).
  19. Kang, C. & Hong-hyun, M. (2002). A Study of Community Solidarity: An Exploration for Effective Community Practice. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 48, 42-81.
  20. Kim, D. (2005). A Comparative Study on the Spatial Configuration of Traditional Village and Apartment. Unpublished Master Dissertation, Sejong University, Seoul.
  21. Kim, K. (1998). A Study on the residents' sense of community in Korea. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  22. Kim, W. (2004). A Study On the Social Exclusion of Public Rental Housing Residents: Focusing on the Social Exclusion through Residential Segregation. Korea Center for City and Environment Research, 9, 87-114.
  23. Kim, S., Kim, S., Kim, S. & Kim, Y. (2002). Residents' Lives in Permanent Rental Housing in Seoul. Seoul: Seoul Development Institute.
  24. Korean Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2008). Handbook of Rental Housing Operation. Gwacheon: Korean Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  25. Massey, D. & Denton, N. (1993). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  26. Mullins, P. & Western, J. (2001). Examining the Links Between Housing and Nine Key Socio Cultural Factors, Final Report. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
  27. Park, Y. (2007). A Study on the Residential Condition of Permanent Rental Housing Projects in Kyungki Province. Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association, 20(3), 99-130.
  28. Park, S., Yoon, Y., Lim, M., Lee, Y., Lim, J., Park, I. & Kim, S. (2009). A Study on the Provision and the Management of New Plus Permanent Rental Housing. Seongnam: Housing and Urban Research Institute.
  29. Rainwater, L. (1970). Behind Ghetto Walls: Black Families in a Federal Slum. Chicago: Aldine.
  30. Roetz, H. (1993). Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  31. Seo, B. & Chiu, R. L. H. (2014). Social Cohesiveness of Disadvantaged Communities in Urban South Korea: The Impact of the Physical Environment. Housing Studies, 29(3), 407-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2013.803519
  32. Seo, S., Kim, J., Jung, K. & Seol, J. (2004). The Planning and Design of Public Housing for Social Integration. Seongnam: Housing and Urban Research Institute.
  33. Shim, T., Kim, M. & Martin, J. (2008). Changing Korea: Understanding Culture and Communication. New York: Peter Lang.
  34. Small, M. (2002). Culture, Cohorts, and Social Organization Theory: Understanding Local Participation in a Latino Housing Project. American Journal of Sociology, 108(1), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1086/345649
  35. Statistics Korea (2010). Population and Housing Census 2010. Daejeon: Statistics Korea.
  36. Wacquant, L. & Wilson, W. (1989). The Cost of Racial and Class Exclusion in the Inner City. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 501, 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716289501001001
  37. Wilson, W. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: the Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  38. Yoon, Y., Cho, Y., Lee, J., Roh, S. & Cho, Y. (2011). Reinforcement of Housing Welfare Services and Rental Housing Construction in Permanent Rental Housing Estates. Daejeon: Land and Housing Institute.
  39. Yung, B. (2007). An Interplay Between Western and Confucian Concepts of Justice: Development of Hong Kong Housing Policy. Housing, Theory & Society, 24(2), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070601119397