Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Characteristics of Lesson Planning of Pre-service Secondary Science Teachers

중등 예비과학교사들의 수업 계획에서 나타나는 특징

  • Received : 2014.03.05
  • Accepted : 2014.04.18
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the characteristics of lesson planning of pre-service secondary science teachers and the factors which influenced in their lesson planning. Thirteen pre-service secondary science teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. Teaching-learning materials such as lesson plans and handouts, and lesson planning journals written by the pre-service teachers were collected. Semi-structured interviews were also conducted to obtain information about their lesson planning activities. The analyses of the results revealed that most of the pre-service teachers did not systematically consider the national science curriculum and focused on planning one lesson only. Instructional objectives were not only considered as minor element in lesson planning, but also limited to cognitive domain. Devising teaching-learning strategies was found to be the starting point of the lesson planning. They accommodated constructivistic teaching-learning theory presented in their method courses through reflective evaluation of the experiences of learning in their secondary schools. The experiment activities that were presented in the textbooks were used themselves when they planned experiments as student activities, but other activities were planned depending on their personal experiences. Most pre-service teachers did not plan assessment because they could not recognize it as an element of lesson planning. These results may offer some implications in educating pre-service secondary science teachers on lesson planning.

이 연구에서는 중등 예비과학교사의 수업 계획의 특징과 이에 영향을 미친 요인을 조사하였다. 서울 소재 사범대학에 재학 중인 13명의 예비과학교사가 연구에 참여하였다. 예비교사들이 작성한 교수학습 지도안과 활동지 등의 교수학습 자료, 수업 계획 일지를 수집하였으며, 수업 계획의 요소별로 예비교사들의 수업 계획에 대한 심층적인 정보를 얻기 위해 반구조화된 면담을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 대부분의 예비교사들은 차시 계획에만 초점을 맞추어 교육과정을 체계적으로 고려하지 않았다. 수업 목표는 수업 계획에서 부차적인 요소로 간주되었으며, 주로 인지적 측면에만 초점을 맞추어 기술되었다. 교수학습 전략을 구체화하는 것은 수업 계획의 출발점이 되었는데, 예비교사들은 자신의 중등학교에서의 학습 경험을 반성적으로 평가하는 과정을 통해 예비교사 교육과정에서 학습한 구성주의적 교수학습 이론을 수용하여 수업 계획에 활용하였다. 교수학습 활동으로 실험 활동을 계획한 경우에는 교과서에 수록된 실험 활동을 그대로 사용하는 경향이 높았으나, 실험 외의 활동은 자신의 개인적 경험에 의존하여 계획하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 예비교사들은 교수학습 평가를 수업 계획의 요소로 인식하지 못하여 이를 계획하지 않는 경우가 많았다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 중등 예비과학교사 교육에서 수업 계획에 대한 구체적인 교육 방안을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ball, A. L., Knobloch, N. A., & Hoop, S. (2007). The instructional planning experiences of beginning teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48(2), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2007.02056
  2. Berk, L. (1997). Child development (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  3. Black, P. J. (1995). Can teachers use assessment to improve learning? British Journal of Curriculum and Assessment, 5(2), 7-11.
  4. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  5. Calderhead, J., & Shorrock, S. B. (1997) Understanding teacher education: Case studies in the professional development of beginning teachers. London: Falmer Press.
  6. Choi, J. -Y. (2006). An qualitative case study of pre-service teacher's planning for the practical arts instruction in the elementary school. The Journal of Elementary Education, 19(1), 477-499.
  7. Chung, H. -Y. (2001). The comparative study of decision-making processes in the social studies lesson planning between elementary level experienced teachers and student teachers. The Journal of Elementary Education, 14(3), 205-223.
  8. Davies, D., & Rogers, M. (2000). Pre-service primary teacher's planning for science and technology activities: Influences and constraints. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(2), 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/713694980
  9. Eggan, P., & Kauchak, D. (2003). Educational psychology, windows on classrooms (6th ed.). NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
  10. Jang, M. D. (2006). Analysis of pre-service teachers' lesson planing strategies in elementary school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 191-205.
  11. Jeong, H. -H. (2009). A study on the actual conditions of secondary student teachers' instruction design during the teaching practicum. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 12(2), 1-30.
  12. John, P. D. (1996). Understanding the apprenticeship of observation in initial teacher training: Exploring student teachers' implicit theories of teaching and learning. In G. Claxton, T. Atkinson, M. Osborn, & M. Wallace (Eds.), Liberating the learner: Lessons for professional development in education (pp. 90-108). London: Routledge.
  13. John, P. D. (2006). Lesson planning and the student teacher: Re-thinking the dominant model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 483-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270500363620
  14. Jones, M. G., & Vesilind, E. M. (1996). Putting practice into theory: Changes in the organization of preservice teachers' pedagogical knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 91-117. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033001091
  15. Kil, Y. (2008). Problems, problem-solving strategies and frame of references of pre-service teachers observed in instructional planning processes. Journal of Research in Subject Matter Education, 12(2), 493-513.
  16. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
  17. Kim, K., Yoon, J., Park, J., & Noh, T. (2011). The components of pedagogical content knowledge considered by secondary science pre-service teachers in planning and implementing teaching demonstrations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(1), 99-114.
  18. Lai, E., & Lam, C. -C. (2011). Learning to teach in a context of education reform: Liberal studies student teachers' decision making in lesson planning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(2), 219-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2011.558287
  19. Lee, S. H., & Lee, K. W. (2003). Teacher's core competencies for utilization of information and communication technology in the knowledge-based society. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 20(3), 203-223.
  20. Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (2009). Mathematics teachers' practices and thinking in lesson plan development: A case of teaching fraction division. ZDM, 41(6), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0174-8
  21. Lim, C. -H. (2003). Nature and development of pedagogical content knowledge in science teaching. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 24(4), 235-249.
  22. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implication for science education. Dordrecht: Kiuwer.
  23. McCutcheon, G., & Milner, H. R. (2002). A contemporary study of teacher planning in a high school english class. Teachers and Teaching, 8(1), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600120110583
  24. McMillan, J. H. (2004). Classroom assessment principle and practice for effective instruction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  25. Nam, J. -H., Seung, E. -S., Um, J. -H., Kim, K. -H., & Choi, B. -S. (1999). The science teachers' perceptions and the status of formative assessment in science teaching. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 43(6), 720-727.
  26. Noh, T., Yoon, J., Kim, J., & Lim, H. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge factors considered by pre-service elementary teachers in planning and implementing of science teaching demonstration. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 350-363.
  27. Park, C. Y., Min, H. J., & Paik, S. H. (2008). An analysis of pre-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through the student-teacher practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 641-648.
  28. Park, K. (2010). Development of descriptive instructional design model based on the expert teacher's instructional planning. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 21-52.
  29. Park, K. -Y., Bae, Y. -G., & Kang, E. -C. (2009). A case study on instructional design process of pre-service teachers in practice teaching. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(3), 169-197.
  30. Park, S. (2008). Effects of the methods course of curriculum materials analysis and instruction on pre-service teachers' teaching efficacy and pedagogical content knowledge in a secondary teacher education program. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(1), 209-233.
  31. Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  32. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitude and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.), (pp. 102-119). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  33. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  34. So, W. W. (1997). A study of teacher cognition in planning elementary science lessons. Research in Science Education, 27(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02463033
  35. Son, Y. -A., Shin, J. L., & Min, B. M. (2007). Using the microteaching technique: Analysis of pre-service biology teacher's class applying the science instructional model. Biology Education, 35(3), 495-507. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2007.35.3.495
  36. Sung, E., Nam, J., & Choi, B. (2000). The characteristics of formative assessments practiced in middle school science teaching from a constructivist perspective. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 455-467.
  37. Tillema, H. H. (1997). Stability and change in student teachers' beliefs. European Journal of Teacher Education, 20(3), 209-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976970200301
  38. Widden, M., Mayer-Smith, J., & Moon, B. (1998). A critical analysis of the research on learning to teach: Making the case for an ecological perspective on inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 130-178. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002130
  39. Yang, C., Bae, Y., & Noh, T. (2013). Analysis of pre-service secondary science teachers' uses of curriculum materials in curriculum design. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1312-1328. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1312

Cited by

  1. The Influence of Practice Teaching Utilizing Content Representation on the Development of Student Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge vol.59, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2015.59.6.520
  2. Exploration of Critical Reflection through Home Economics Pre-service Teacher’s Instruction Experience vol.56, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6115/fer.2018.022
  3. Analysis of pre-service early childhood teachers' perception of instructional planning during their student teaching vol.9, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.16978/ecec.2014.9.4.003
  4. The preliminary validation of an analysis instrument for use in evaluatingthe effectiveness of early childhood science lessons vol.34, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.18023/kjece.2014.34.5.001
  5. Implications of Teacher Training for Pre-service Secondary Biology Teachersat the College of Education through Analysing the Examinationfor Appointing Secondary School Biology Teachers vol.44, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.1.179
  6. 교육실습에서 중등 예비과학교사들의 수업계획과 실제수업의 불일치 분석 vol.36, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0435
  7. 중등 예비화학교사의 수업 계획에서 교사용 지도서의 활용 방식 분석 vol.36, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0681
  8. A Change of Learner in Lesson-Plan Instruction Process on Geography Education vol.25, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17279/jkagee.2017.25.1.65
  9. 지구과학 예비교사들은 '수업'에서 무엇을 보는가? -예비교사들의 수업 경험과 비평을 통해서- vol.10, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15523/jksese.2017.10.2.199
  10. 영국 예비 과학교사의 교육실습 사례 분석을 통한 예비 교사교육에 대한 시사점 vol.45, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.4.564
  11. 예비과학교사가 계획한 비유 사용 수업의 특징 vol.62, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2018.62.2.148
  12. A Study on the Lesson Planning Ability of Pre-service Secondary School Biology Teachers vol.46, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.4.476
  13. 예비수학교사의 교수·학습 과정안 재구성을 통한 수업 설계 변화 탐색 vol.23, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2020.23.1.008