International Journal of Costume and Fashion

  • 제14권1호
  • /
  • Pages.17-28
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2233-9051(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-7490(eISSN)
한국복식학회 (The Korean Society of Costume)
권호 표지

Is Anything Ever New? Fashion Design Students' Perceptions of Piracy

  • Marcketti, Sara B. (AESHM Department, Iowa State University) ;
  • Greder, Kate (University Museums, Iowa State University) ;
  • Sinclair, Heather (Burt's Bees)
  • 투고 : 2014.04.08
  • 심사 : 2014.05.21
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Design piracy is the unauthorized copying of another designer or manufacturer's work. While controversial, it is an institutionalized practice in the apparel industry. The purpose of this study was to better understand student perceptions of design piracy, particularly as it is one they will encounter in their future careers. The authors interviewed twenty-four apparel design students at a land-grant Midwestern University. Data was analyzed using theme analysis. Three themes developed including: 1) Expressions of cognitive dissonance in statements expressing enjoyment of the practice of design piracy as a consumer; yet disappointment when (and if) their own design work was copied. 2) Concerns regarding the definition of originality and the logistics of enforcing a plan against design piracy. 3) Differences of opinion regarding the prevalence of the practice, particularly if the students had industry experience or not. Advice for professors from students regarding piracy is included.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen, E. S. (1944). Legal protection for artistic designs. The Bulletin of the American Ceramic Society, 423-427.
  2. Casabona, L. (2006, February 1). Fighting knockoffs by protecting: A brand, Women's Wear Daily, 12-13.
  3. Clark, E. (2011, March 16). Fashion lobbies Congress for tougher piracy stance, Women's Wear Daily, 3.
  4. Copyright, policy, and file sharing (2013). University of West Georgia. Retrieved from: http://www.westga.edu/policy/index_13313.php
  5. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  6. Cox C., & Jenkins, J. (2005, January 29). Between the seams, A fertile commons. Paper presented at USC Annenberg: A Norman Lear Center Ready to Share: Fashion and the Ownership of Creativity Conference.
  7. Duarte, F. (2008). What we learn today is how we behave tomorrow: A study on students' perceptions of ethics in management education. Social Responsibility Journal, 4(1/2), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856884
  8. Ellis, K. (2012a, September 11). Design piracy bill returns. Women's Wear Daily, 1, 15.
  9. Ellis, K. (2012b, December 14). Feds bust counterfeit operation. Women's Wear Daily, 2.
  10. Ellis, K. (2010, May 4). Fashion caucus eyes design piracy, garment district. Women's Wear Daily, 12.
  11. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  12. Garner, M. B., & Keiser, S. J. (2012). Beyond design: The synergy of apparel product development. New York: Fairchild.
  13. Glock, R. E. & Kunz, G. I. (2004). Apparel manufacturing: Sewn products analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
  14. Hartman, S. (1934, September 25). Protest move to bar dress style copying. The New York Times, 32.
  15. Hemphill, C. S., & Suk, J. (2013). The Fashion Originators' Guild of America: Self-Help at the Edge of IP and Antitrust. Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 13-344. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2237799 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237799
  16. Hollahan, L. (2010). How to use, adapt, and design sewing patterns. Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
  17. Hollen, N. R. & Kundel, C. M. (1993). Pattern making by the flat-pattern method. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
  18. Hutchinson, K. (1940). Design piracy. Harvard Business Review, 191-198.
  19. Labor Behind the Label (n.d.). "Resources," Retrieved from http://www.labourbehindthelabel.org/resources
  20. Landgren, T. M., & Pasricha, A. (2011). Transforming the fashion and apparel curriculum to incorporate sustainability. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 4(3), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2011.613856
  21. Lee, J. Y., Halter, H., Johnson, K. K. P., Ju, H. (2013). Investigating fashion disposition with young consumers. Social Responsibility Journal, 14(1), 67-78.
  22. Leininger, M. M. (1985). Ethnography and ethnonursing: Models and modes of qualitative data analysis. In Qualitative research methods in nursing, ed. M. M. Leininger, 33-72. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
  23. Magdo, C. (2000). Protecting works of fashion from design piracy. LEDA at Harvard Law School. Retrieved March 2, 2013 from http://leda.law.harvard.edu/leda/data/36/MAGDO.html.
  24. Marcketti, S. B. & Parsons, J. L. (2006). Design piracy and self regulation: The Fashion Originators' Guild of America: 1932-1941, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(3), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X06293071
  25. Marcketti, S. B. (2007). Design piracy: Student perceptions of a constructive controversy activity. College Student Journal, 41(4), 1046-1054.
  26. Orzada, B. T., & Cobb, K. (2011). Ethical fashion project: Partnering with industry. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology, and Education, 4(3), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2011.606233
  27. Pasricha, A., & Kadolph, S. J. (2009). Millennial generation and fashion education: A discussion on agents of change. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 2(2-3), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543260903390183
  28. Ramey, J. (2000, March 23). Top court favors Wal-Mart in trade-dress case. Women's Wear Daily, 14.
  29. Raustiala, K., & Sprigman, C. (2006). The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design. Virginia Law Review, 92(8), 1687-777.
  30. Smith, B. (1989). A study of uneven industrial development: The American clothing industry in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Yale University
  31. Smith, E. G. (2013, September 12). Fashion designers look to patents to fight knockoffs. Reuter's. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/12/us-usa-fashion-newyork-patents-idUSBRE98B0H420130912
  32. Steigard, A. (2010, September 9). The copycat threat. Women's Wear Daily, 1(18).
  33. Wolfe, D. (2006, July 27). Testimony before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property. Legislative Hearing on H.R. 5055, Washington, D.C.
  34. Wood, S. (2003, July 27-29). Buying knockoffs is a slippery slope, USA Weekend, 17.