DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Relationship of Climate of Silence, LMX, and Innovation Behavior

침묵분위기, LMX, 혁신행동의 관계에 대한 실증연구

  • Lee, Byeong Jin (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kwang Hee (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Jang, Eun Hye (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Enkh-Otgon., D (Department of Business Administration, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2014.08.07
  • Accepted : 2014.09.11
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the negative effects of silence climate on the innovation behavior and LMX (Leader-Member Exchange). In order to test our model, we conducted a survey based on the questionnaire. Results showed that silence climate had a negative effect on the innovation behavior and LMX. Secondly, The LMX had a positive effect on innovation behavior. Moreover, the LMX partially mediated silence climate and the innovation behavior. Finally, we drew a conclusion by discussing limitations and implications of the research, and suggested directions for further researches.

Keywords

References

  1. Amabile, T.M., A Model of creativity and innovation in organizations, M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 1988, Vol. 10, p 123-130.
  2. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., and Herron, M., Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity, Academy of Management Journal, 1996, Vol. 39, No. 5, p 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
  3. Argyris, C. and Schon, D., Organizational learning. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley, 1978.
  4. Ashford, S.J., Sutcliffe, K., and Christianson, M.K., Speaking up and speaking out : the leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. See Greenberg and Edwards, 2009, p 175-202.
  5. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y., On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1998, Vol. 16, p 74-94.
  6. Baik, Y.M. and Kim, S.K., An Empirical Study on the Relationships between Problem Solving style, LMX, Attitude, Compettitive Pressure and Innovation Behavior. Korean Academy of Organization and Management, 2000, Vol. 8, No. 1, p 293-321.
  7. Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, Vol. 51, p 1173-1182.
  8. Basu, R.J., An empirical examination of leader-member exchange and transformation leadership as predictor of innovative behavior, Doctoral Dissertation. Indiana lafayette : Purdue University, 1991.
  9. Botero, I.C. and Van Dyne, L.V., Employee voice behavior : interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Manag. Commun. Q., 2009, Vol. 23, p 84-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335415
  10. Bourgeois, L. Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, Vol. 28, p 548-573. https://doi.org/10.2307/256113
  11. Bouwen, R. and Fry, R., Organizational innovation and learning : four patterns of dialog between the dominant logic and the new logic. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1991, Vol. 21, p 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1991.11656566
  12. Bridge, K. and Baxter, L., Blended relationships : Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 1992, Vol. 56, p 200-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570319209374414
  13. Brinsfield, C., Edwards, M., and Greenberg, J., Employee voice and silence : An historical overview. In J. Greenberg and M. Edwards (Eds.). Employee Voice and Silence in Organizations, 2009, p 3-34. Bingley, UK :Emerald Press.
  14. Choi, C.H., The Mediating Effect of Open Communication on the Relationship between LMX and Innovative Work Behavior,[master's thesis]. [Seoul, Korea] Pukyong National University, 2011.
  15. Crant, J.M., Kim, T., andWang, J., Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior. J. Bus. Psychol, 2010, Vol. 26, p 285-297.
  16. Damanpour, F. Organizational innovation : A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, Vol. 34, p 555-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
  17. Deming, W.E., Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 1986.
  18. Detert, J.R. and Burris, E.R., Leadership behavior and employee voice : Is the door really open?. Acad. Manag. J., 2007, Vol. 50, p 869-884. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279183
  19. Detert, J.R. and Trevino, L.K., Speaking up to higher ups : how supervisor and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organ. Sci, 2010, Vol. 21, p 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
  20. Dienesch, R.M. and Liden, R.C. Leader-member exchange model of leadership : A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 1986, Vol. 11, p 618-634.
  21. Duchon, D., Green, S., and Taber, T.D., Vertical Dyad Linkage : A Longitudinal Assessment of Antecedents, Measures, and Consequences, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, Vol. 71, No. 1, p 56-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.56
  22. Edmondson, A.C., Speaking up in the operating room : how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J. Manag. Stud, 2003, Vol. 40, p 1419- 1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386
  23. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., and Davis-LaMastro, V. Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990, Vol. 75, p 5l-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
  24. Elizabeth, W. Morrison, Employee Voice and Silence, Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav, 2014, p 173-197.
  25. Enz, C.A. and Schwenk, C.R., The performance edge : Strategic and value dissensus. Employee Responsibility and Rights Journal, 1991, Vol. 4, p 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01390440
  26. Farr, J.L. and Ford, C.M., Individual innovation, In M. A. West and J.L. Farr(Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work, 1990, p 63-80, New York, Wiley.
  27. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, XXVII, 1981, Vol. 18, p 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  28. Frazier, M.L. and Fainshmidt, S., Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Group Organ. Manag, 2012, Vol. 37, p 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112463960
  29. Fuller, J., Marler, L., and Hester, K., Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior : exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J. Organ. Behav, 2006, Vol. 27, p 1089- 1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.408
  30. Graen, G.B., Scandura, T.A., and Graen, M.R., A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, Vol. 71, p 484-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.484
  31. Grean, G.B. and Cashman, J., A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations : A developmental approach, in J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson(eds), Leadership frontiers, 1975, p 143-165. Kent, OH : Kent State University Press.
  32. Greenberg, J. and Edwards, M., eds., Voice and Silence in Organizations. Bingley, UK : Emerald, 2009.
  33. Hammond, M.M., Neff, N.L., Farr, J.L., Schwall, A.R., and Zhao, X., Predictors of individual-level innovation at work : A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2011, Vol. 5, No. 1, p 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556
  34. Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J.W., and Woodman, R.W., Organizational Behavior. 5th, (Eds), N.Y. : West, 1991.
  35. Janssen, O. and Van Yperen, N.W., Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, Vol. 45, p 368-384.
  36. Janssen, O., Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2000, Vol. 73, p 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  37. Kahn, W.A., Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, Vol. 33, No. 4, p 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  38. Kanter, R.M., Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 1985, Vol. 1, p 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(85)90006-0
  39. Kanter, R., When a Thous and Flowers Bloom : Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1988, Vol. 10, p 169-211.
  40. King, N., Innovation at work : The research literature, In M.A. West and J.L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work, 1990, p 15-59, New York, Wiley.
  41. Kleysen, R.F. and Street, C.T., Toward a multi-dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2001, Vol. 2, No. 3, p 284- 296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
  42. Krause, D.E., Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovationrelated behaviors An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 2004, Vol. 15, p 79-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.006
  43. Lee, K.H. and Lee, C.K., An empirical study on the factor structure of justice. Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2004, Vol. 27, No. 1, p 93-102.
  44. Lee, I.S., A Study on Antecedent Factors for Innovative Behaviors, 1999, Vol. 23, No. 1, p 89-113.
  45. LePine, J.A. and Van Dyne L.V., Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance : evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psychol, 2001, Vol. 86, p 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326
  46. Lewicki, R.J. and Bunker, B.B., Developing and maintaining trust in working relationships. In R.M. Kramer and T.R. Tyler (Eds.) Trust in Organizations : Frontiers of Theory and Research. London : Sage, 1996.
  47. Liang, J., Farh, C.I.C., and Farh, J.L., Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice : a twowave examination. Acad. Manag. J, 2012, Vol. 55, p 71-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
  48. Liden, R.C. and Maslyn, J.M., Multidimensionality of leader- member exchange : An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 1998, Vol. 24, p 43-73.
  49. Liden, R.C. and Maslyn, J.M., Scale development of a MDM measure of LMX, Paper presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Atlanta, GA. 1993.
  50. Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., and Stilwell, D., A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, Vol. 78, p 662-674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.662
  51. Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R., The social psychology of procedural justice. New York : Plenum, 1988.
  52. Liu, W., Zhu, R., and Yang, Y., I warn you because I like you : voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. Leadersh. Q., 2010, Vol. 21, p 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014
  53. Luchak, A.A., What kind of voice do loyal employees use? Br. J. Ind. Relat, 2003, Vol. 41, p 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00264
  54. Luthans, F. Organizational Behavior, 6th (Eds), McGraw- Hill, 1995.
  55. Mackinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., and Sheets, V., A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 2002, Vol. 7, No. 1, p 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
  56. March, J. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 1991, Vol. 2, p 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  57. Mathieu, J.E. and Farr, J.L., Futher evidence for the discriminant validity of measures of organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991, Vol. 76, p 127-133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.1.127
  58. Mathieu, J.E. and Zajac, D.M., A review and meta analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 1990, Vol. 108, p 171-194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
  59. Miller, I.G., Living systems : The organization. Behavioral Science, 1972, Vol. 17, p l-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830170102
  60. Miller, V.D., Johnson, J.R., Hart, Z., and Peterson, D. L., A test of antecedents and outcomes of employee role negotiation ability. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 1999, Vol. 27, No. 1, p 24-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889909365522
  61. Milliken, F.J., Morrison, E.W., and Hewlin, P., An exploratory study of employee silence : issues that employees don't communicate upward and why. J. Manag. Stud, 2003, Vol. 40, p 1453-1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
  62. Morrison, E.W. and Milliken, F.J., Organizational Silence a Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World. Academy of Management Review, 2000, Vol. 25, p 706-725.
  63. Morrison, E.W., Employee Voice and Silence, Annu. Rev., Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav, 2014, Vol. 1, p 173-197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
  64. Mumford, M.D. and Gustafson, S.B., Creativity Syndrome : Integration, Application, and Innovation, Psychological Bulletin, 1988, p 27-43.
  65. Nemeth, C.J., Managing innovation : When less is more. California Management Review, 1997, Vol. 40, No. 1, p 59-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165922
  66. Olson-Buchanan, J.B., To grieve or not to grieve : factors related to voicing discontent in an organizational simulation. Int. J. Confl. Manag, 1997, Vol. 8, p 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022793
  67. Park, K.K. and I.S. Lee, Corporate Globalization and New Paradigm for Management Process : Innovation as Attackers' Advantages. Korean Academy of Organization and Management, 2000, Vol. 24, No. 1, p 59-85.
  68. Penley, L.E. and Hawkins, B., Studying interpersonal communication in organizations : A leadership application. Academy of Management Journal, 1985, Vol. 28, No. 2, p 309-326. https://doi.org/10.2307/256203
  69. Pinder, C.C. and Harlos, K.P., Employee silence : quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Res. Pers. Hum. Res. Manag, 2001, Vol. 20, p 331-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(01)20007-3
  70. Rousseau, D.M., The construction of climate in organizational research, International review of Industrial and Organization Psychology, 1988.
  71. Saunders, D.M., Shepard, B.H., Knight, V., and Roth, J., Employee voice to supervisors. Empl. Responsib. Rights J., 1992, Vol. 5, p 241-259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385051
  72. Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A., Determinants of innovation behavior : A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, Vol. 37, No. 3, p 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  73. Shaw, M.E., Group dynamics : The psychology of small group behavior, New York : McGraw-Hill, 1981.
  74. Sias, P.M. and Jablin, F.M., Differential superior-subordinate relations, perceptions of fairness, and coworker communication. Human Communication Reaseach, 1995, Vol. 22, p 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1995.tb00360.x
  75. Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z., and Cheung, S.Y., Applying uncertainty management theory to employee voice behavior : an integrative investigation. Pers. Psychol., 2012, Vol. 65, p 285-323.
  76. Tangirala, S., Kamdar, D., Venkataramani, V., and Parke, M., Doing right versus getting ahead : the effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees' voice. J. Appl. Psychol, 2013, Vol. 98, p 1040-1050. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033855
  77. Tangirala, S. and Ramanujam, R., Ask and you shall hear : examining the relationship between manager consultation and employee voice. Pers. Psychol, 2012, Vol. 65, p 251-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01248.x
  78. Tangirala, S. and Ramanujam, R., Employee silence on critical work issues : the cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Pers. Psychol, 2008a, Vol. 61, p. 37-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.x
  79. Tangirala, S. and Ramanujam, R., Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice : the effects of personal control and organizational identification. Acad. Manag. J., 2008b, Vol. 51, p 1189-1203. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732719
  80. Vakola, M. and Bouradas, D., Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Silence : an Empirical Investigation. Employee Relations, 2005, Vol. 27, No. 5, p 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450510611997
  81. Van de Ven, A.H., Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science, 1986, Vol. 32, p 1442-1485.
  82. Van Dyne, L.V., Kamdar, D., and Joireman, J., In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice. J. Appl. Psychol, 2008, Vol. 93, p 1195-1207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.6.1195
  83. Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., and Botero, I.C., Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, Vol. 40, No. 6, p 1359-1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384
  84. Venkataramani, V. and Tangirala, S., When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. J. Appl. Psychol., 2010, Vol. 95, p 582-591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018315
  85. West, M.A., Innovation amongst health care professionals. Social Behaviour, 1989, Vol. 4, p 173-184.
  86. Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., and Griffin, R.W., To ward a Theory of Organizational Creativity, Academy of Management Review, 1993, Vol. 18, No. 2, p 293- 321.