DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the transformation of the fisheries relations in accordance with the changes in Japan and Russia Fisheries Agreement

일본과 러시아 간 어업질서의 재편에 따른 양국 어업관계의 변모

  • 김대영 (한국해양수산개발원 수산연구본부)
  • Received : 2015.07.22
  • Accepted : 2015.08.19
  • Published : 2015.08.31

Abstract

This research examined the transformations of the fisheries relations between Japan and Russia since the establishment of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) system. The author reviewed the transformations with investigation on mutual fishing access to EEZ including salmon & trout catches. The Japan-Russia fisheries relations have evolved through multiple developmental stages, which include mutual fishing access to EEZ, the reductions of a fishing quota to balance catches of the nations, provision of financial and technical support, and a payment system of EEZ fishing access fee. The Japanese salmon industry also has done similar practices, continuing to catch salmon and trout in the Russian EEZ. Additionally, Japan and Russia have attempted to develop joint fisheries projects and to assure fishing operation safety around Kuril Islands. The case of Japan-Russia mutual fishing access shows that a country that has authority over crucial fisheries resources tends to establish specific conditions of mutual fishing access so that it maximizes its national interest. Thus, this case gives us implication what could be future directions of Korea-China-Japan multinational fishing access. The principle of same number of fishing vessels and quantities of catches has worked in existing mutual fishing access to EEZ among Korea, China, and Japan. However, it is expected that a nation that is endowed with abundant fisheries resources would limit counterpart's fishing access to its EEZ. Therefore, Korean fisheries administration should prepare for all possible situations like a dramatic cut in fishing quota and the termination of fishing access. International fisheries cooperation and payment of fishing access could be viable options for such a situation.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, J. H. (2012), International fisheries law theory, Pukyong National University Press, 63-65.
  2. Hasegawa, A., Hiroyoshi, K. and Kase, K. (1988), The Fisheries Industry in the New era Ocean, Nousangyoson Bunka Kyoukai, 42-72.
  3. Japanese Fisheries Agency (2003), Japanese Fisheries Diplomacy, 5-6, 29-36.
  4. Japanese Fisheries Agency (2008), Fisheries Agency 50 year history.
  5. Japanese Fisheries Agency policy information magazine (2015), Gyosei no mado, Vol. 116, 2-4.
  6. Japanese Fisheries Research Agency.National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, The current state of international fishery resources, pelagic.bottom fish in Japan and Russia (reviewed), (http://kokushi.job.affrc.go.jp/index-2.html).
  7. Ji, C. G. (1979), Peace Line, Beop Mun company, 167-234.
  8. Kataoka, C. (2006), History of Fisheries Rekationship among Japan, Korea, and China I, Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Nagasaki University, 87, 15-16.
  9. Kataoka, C. and Nishida, A. (2007), History of Fisheries Rekationship among Japan, Korea, and China II, Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Nagasaki University, 88, 153-156.
  10. Kim, D. Y. (1999), "Reorganization of International Fisheries Regime in the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea," The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 30 (1), 97-98.
  11. Kitano Y. (1980), The bottom fish resources in Hokkaido, The bottom fish resources, Kouseisya Kouseigaku, 204-228.
  12. Mizukami C. (1995), Japan and Law of the Sea, Yushindo, 44-57.
  13. Morizane K. (1977), The new Law of the Sea and Japanese Fisheries Industry, Sozo Syobou, 120-125.
  14. Suisansya. (2011), Fisheries Yearbook, 73.
  15. Suisansya, Fisheries Yearbook, Each year.