DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Autogenous fresh demineralized tooth graft prepared at chairside for dental implant

  • Received : 2014.12.25
  • Accepted : 2015.02.05
  • Published : 2015.12.31

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of autogenous fresh demineralized tooth (auto-FDT) graft prepared at the chairside for alveolar bone grafting during dental implant surgery. Methods: In total, 38 patients requiring both tooth extraction (for endodontic or periodontal reasons or third molar extraction) and alveolar bone regeneration for dental implant placement were included. Within 2 h after clean extraction, the teeth were prepared at the chairside to serve as bone graft material. In the same sitting, blocks or chips of this graft material were used to reconstruct defects at the osteotomy site simultaneously with or before implant placement. Twelve months after prosthesis fabrication and placement, the clinical findings and implant success rates were evaluated. Histological studies were randomly conducted for selected cases. Results: Clinical evaluation showed favorable wound healing with minimal complications and good bone support for the implants. No implant was lost after 12 months of function following prosthetic rehabilitation. Histological examination revealed new bone formation induced by the graft material. Conclusions: Chairside preparation of autogenous fresh demineralized teeth after extraction can be a useful alternative to the use of autogenous bone or other graft materials for the immediate reconstruction of alveolar bone defects to facilitate subsequent implant placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, Kim SY (2010) Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 4:496-503
  2. Qian JJ, Bhatnagar RS (1996) Enhanced cell attachment to anorganic bone mineral in the presence of a synthetic peptide related to collagen. J Biomed Mater Res 4:545-554
  3. Liu Y, Luo D, Liu S, Fu Y, Kou X, Wang X, Sha Y, Gan Y, Zhou Y (2014) Effect of nanostructure of mineralized collagen scaffolds on their physical properties and osteogenic potential. J Biomed Nanotechnol 6:1049-1060
  4. Beniash E (2011) Biominerals-hierarchical nanocomposites: the example of bone. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1:47-69
  5. Pashley DH (1989) Dentin: a dynamic substrate-a review. Scanning Microsc 1:161-174
  6. Nanci A (2008) Ten Cate's oral histology: development, structure and function, 8th edn. Mosby Elsevier, St Louis, Mo, pp 108-192
  7. Dirksen TR, Marinetti GV (1970) Lipids of bovine enamel and dentin and human bone. Calcif Tissue Res 1:1-10
  8. Yeomans JD, Urist MR (1967) Bone induction by demineralized dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 12:999-1008 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90095-7
  9. Butler WT, Mikulski A, Urist MR, Bridges G, Uyeno S (1977) Noncollagenous proteins of a rat dentin matrix possessing bone morphogenetic activity. J Dent Res 3:228-232
  10. Murata M, Akazawa T, Takahata M, Ito M, Tazaki J, Nakamura K, Iwasaki N, Shibata T, Arisue M (2010) Bone induction of human tooth and bone crushed by newly developed automatic mill. J Ceramic Soc Jpn 1378:434-437
  11. Nordenram A, Bang G, Bernhoft CH (1975) A clinical-radiographic study of allogenic demineralized dentin implants in cystic jaw cavities. Int J Oral Surg 2:61-64
  12. Murata M (2003) Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix for maxillary sinus augmentation in humans: the first clinical report. 81th International Association for Dental Research, Gothenburg
  13. Atiya BK, Shanmuhasuntharam P, Huat S, Abdulrazzak S, Oon H (2014) Liquid nitrogen-treated autogenous dentin as bone substitute: an experimental study in a rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2: e165-e170
  14. Rezende ML, Consolaro A, Sant'ana AC, Damante CA, Greghi SL, Passanezi E (2014) Demineralization of the contacting surfaces in autologous onlay bone grafts improves bone formation and bone consolidation. J Periodontol 5:e121-e129
  15. Gomes MF (2006) Densitometric analysis of the autogenous demineralized dentin matrix on the dental socket wound healing process in humans. Braz Oral Res 4:324-330
  16. Kim YK, Lee JY, Kim SG, Lim SC (2013) Guided bone regeneration using demineralized allogenic bone matrix with calcium sulphate: case series. J Adv Prosthodont 2:167-171
  17. Lee EY, Kim ES, Lim KW (2014) Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy studies on processed tooth graft material by vacuum-ultrasonic acceleration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 3:103-110
  18. Movin S, Borring-Miller G (1982) Regeneration of infrabony periodontal defects in humans after implantation of allogenic demineralized dentin. J Clin Periodontol 9:141-147 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1982.tb01230.x
  19. Suzuki S, Haruyama N, Nishimura F, Kulkarni AB (2012) Dentin sialophosphoprotein and dentin matrix protein-1: two highly phosphorylated proteins in mineralized tissues. Arch Oral Biol 9:1165-1175
  20. Pietrak WS, Ali SN, Chitturi D, Jacob M, Woodell-May JE (2011) BMP depletion occurs during prolonged acid demineralization of bone: characterization and implications for graft preparation. Cell Tissue Bank 12:81-88 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-009-9168-6
  21. Xu C, Wang Y (2012) Chemical composition and structure of peritubular and intertubular human dentine revisited. Arch Oral Biol 4:383-391
  22. Behrend O, Schubert H (2001) Influence of hydrostatic pressure and gas content on continuous ultrasound emulsification. Ultrason Sonochem 8:271-276 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(01)00088-8
  23. ASM Handbook Committee (1994) ASM Handbook: Volume 5: Surface Engineering. In: Chap. 6 ultrasonic cleaning 10th ed. ASM International, Ohio, USA, pp 44-47
  24. Bakhshalian N, Hooshmand S, Campbell SC, Kim JS, Brummel-Smith K, Arjmandi BH (2013) Biocompatibility and microstructural analysis of osteopromotive property of allogenic demineralized dentin matrix. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 6:1655-1662

Cited by

  1. Comparative study on bone regeneration between silk mat incorporated 4-hexylresorcinol and collagen membrane vol.34, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7852/ijie.2017.34.2.32
  2. Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Maxillary Sinus Augmentation With Deproteinized Bovine Bone and Demineralized Particulate Human Tooth Graft : An Experimental Study in Rabbits vol.27, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000755
  3. Histomorphometric study of rabbit's maxillary sinus augmentation with various graft materials vol.51, pp.suppl1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2018.51.s1.s1
  4. Resorbable PCEC/gelatin-bismuth doped bioglass-graphene oxide bilayer membranes for guided bone regeneration vol.14, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ab007b
  5. Using extracted teeth as a novel graft material in atrophic ridge augmentation: A report of two cases with histology and cone-beam computed tomography vol.3, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/gfsc.gfsc_14_19
  6. Socket preservation using demineralized tooth graft: A case series report with histological analysis vol.3, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4103/gfsc.gfsc_16_19
  7. The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review vol.11, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041853
  8. Integration of Dental Implants in Conjunction with EDTA-Conditioned Dentin Grafts: An Experimental Study vol.9, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060063
  9. Autogenous Mineralized Dentin versus Xenograft granules in Ridge Preservation for Delayed Implantation in Post‐extraction Sites: A Randomized controlled clinical trial with an 18 months follow vol.32, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13765
  10. Comparison of immunohistochemical analysis on sinus augmentation using demineralized tooth graft and bovine bone vol.47, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.4.269