DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robust Bayesian analysis for autoregressive models

  • Ryu, Hyunnam (Department of Statistics, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Dal Ho (Department of Statistics, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2014.12.27
  • Accepted : 2015.01.27
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

Time series data sometimes show violation of normal assumptions. For cases where the assumption of normality is untenable, more exible models can be adopted to accommodate heavy tails. The exponential power distribution (EPD) is considered as possible candidate for errors of time series model that may show violation of normal assumption. Besides, the use of exible models for errors like EPD might be able to conduct the robust analysis. In this paper, we especially consider EPD as the exible distribution for errors of autoregressive models. Also, we represent this distribution as scale mixture of uniform and this form enables efficient Bayesian estimation via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G. C. (1992). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis, Wiley, New York.
  2. DiCiccio, T. J. and Monti, A. C. (2004). Inferential aspects of the skew exponential power distribution. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000000359
  3. Fernandez, C. and Steel, M. F. J. (1998). On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 359-571.
  4. Salazar, E., Ferreira, M. R. A. and Migon, H. S. (2012). Objective Bayesian analysis for exponential power regression models. Aankhya B, 74, 107-125.
  5. Walker, S. G. and Gutierrez-Pena, E. (1999). Robustifying Bayesian procedures. In Bayesian Statistics 6, edited by J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid, and A. F. M. Smith, Oxford University Press, New York, 685-710.
  6. Zhu, D. and Zinde-Walsh, V. (2009). Properties and estimation of asymmetric exponential power distribution. Journal of Econometrics, 148, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.038