DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Validation Study of the Modified Korean Version of Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (K-ELW)

간호사가 인지하는 간호관리자의 윤리적 리더십 측정 도구 K-ELW의 타당화 연구

  • 김정언 (건국대학교 글로컬캠퍼스 대학원) ;
  • 박은준 (건국대학교 글로컬캠퍼스 간호학과)
  • Received : 2014.07.10
  • Accepted : 2015.01.19
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Ethical Leadership at Work questionnaire (K-ELW) that measures RNs' perceived ethical leadership of their nurse managers. Methods: The strong validation process suggested by Benson (1998), including translation and cultural adaptation stage, structural stage, and external stage, was used. Participants were 241 RNs who reported their perceived ethical leadership using both the pre-version of K-ELW and a previously known Ethical Leadership Scale, and interactional justice of their managers, as well as their own demographics, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Data analyses included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, reliability coefficients, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. SPSS 19.0 and Amos 18.0 versions were used. Results: A modified K-ELW was developed from construct validity evidence and included 31 items in 7 domains: People orientation, task responsibility fairness, relationship fairness, power sharing, concern for sustainability, ethical guidance, and integrity. Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity were supported according to the correlation coefficients of the 7 domains with other measures. Conclusion: The results of this study provide preliminary evidence that the modified K-ELW can be adopted in Korean nursing organizations, and reliable and valid ethical leadership scores can be expected.

Keywords

References

  1. Kalshoven K, Den Hartog DN, De Hoogh AHB. Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly. 2011;22(1):51-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.007
  2. Brown ME, Trevino LK, Harrison DA. Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2005;97(2):117-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
  3. Brown ME, Trevino LK. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly. 2006;17(6):595-616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
  4. Kang YS. Research on the mediators effect of organizational commitment between HRM ethics and organizational citizenship behavior. The Korea Academy of Business Ethics. 2000;2:171-191.
  5. Jung HS, Kim MJ, Yoon HH. Effect of the practice for ethics management on the employees' job satisfaction in the foodservice industry. Korea Academic Society of Hotel Administration. 2007;16(1):105-120.
  6. Lee JS. Nurse managers' ethical leadership, type of organizational culture and organizational performance [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans University; 2009.
  7. Lee KH. Effects of ethical leadership on perceived organizational support and organizational commitment of nurses in a hospital: Mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration. 2010;16(4):419-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2010.16.4.419
  8. Yi MS, Son SW, Chang YC. Determinants and outcomes of ethical leadership. Korea Journal of Business Administration. 2009;22(6):3169-3193.
  9. Kim BJ. Techniques for cross-cultural translation and validation of questionnaires. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2003;14(1):13-26.
  10. Yeom HE. Cultural adaptation and the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the symptom management beliefs questionnaire. Asian Nursing Research. 2013;7(3):104-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2013.06.002
  11. Benson J. Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2005; 17(1):10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00616.x
  12. Oh SH, Kim BJ. New concept of validity for psychological assessment instruments and its usage. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology. 2002;13(3):111-126.
  13. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  14. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1993;46(12):1417-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N
  15. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2011;17(2):268-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
  16. Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health. 2005;8(2):94-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
  17. World Health Organization. Process of translation and adaptation of instruments [Internet]. Geneva, CH: Author; 2013 [cited 2013 August 1]. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
  18. Jung HK, Shim DS, Kim MJ. The effects of leaders' ethical leadership on followers' job performance, organizational commitment and organization citizenship behaviors: The mediating effect of organization-based self-esteem and the moderating effect of corporate ethical values. Korean Journal of Business Administration. 2013;26(4):801-827.
  19. Hendriks E. Ethical leadership and moral behavior of employees: The moderating role of interactional justice [master's thesis]. Tilburg, NL: Tilburg University; 2011.
  20. Hinkin TR. A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods. 1998;1(1):104-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
  21. Mowday RT, Steers RM, Porter LW. The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1979;14(2):224-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
  22. Chang KW. A study on structural modeling of organizational citizenship behaviors for nurses [dissertation]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2010.
  23. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Moorman RH, Fetter R. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly. 1990;1(2):107-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  24. Min JI. A study on influence of subordinate's justice perception on organizational effectiveness: By using emotional competence of supervisor as a modulating effect [master's thesis]. Jeonju: Chonbuk National University; 2010.
  25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.
  26. Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(5):587-594. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  27. Hair JF, Black B, Babin B, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2005.
  28. Kim DE. AMOS A to Z. Paju: Hakhyunsa; 2008.
  29. Sharma S, Mukherjee S, Kumar A, Dillon WR. A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research. 2005;58(7):935-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007
  30. Roszkowski MJ, Soven M. Shifting gears: Consequences of including two negatively worded items in the middle of a positively worded questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35(1): 117-134.
  31. Lee K, Shin S. Validity of instrument development research in Korean nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(6):697-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697

Cited by

  1. 수간호사의 윤리적 리더십이 간호사의 직무만족에 미치는 영향: 정서적 몰입의 매개효과 vol.22, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2016.22.5.553
  2. 간호사가 지각한 수간호사의 윤리적 리더십이 간호업무성과에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰의 매개효과 vol.23, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2017.23.5.483
  3. Research on How Emotional Expressions of Emotional Labor Workers and Perception of Customer Feedbacks Affect Turnover Intentions: Emphasis on Moderating Effects of Emotional Intelligence vol.9, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02526
  4. Impact of ethical factors on job satisfaction among Korean nurses vol.26, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017742959
  5. Influence of Ethical Leadership of Nursing Unit Managers on Job Embeddedness of Staff Nurses: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Trust in Supervisor vol.27, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2021.27.1.21