DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between roar sound and regional groups of Steller sea lion, Eumetopias jubatus

큰바다사자의 명음과 지역적 그룹과의 관계

  • Park, Tae-Geon (Team of Education and Research, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Iida, Kohji (Division of Marine Bioresource and Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences) ;
  • Kim, Wook-Sung (Team of Education and Research, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Ki (Team of Education and Research, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Jae (Team of Education and Research, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Ryu, Kyong-Jin (Team of Education and Research, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Lee, Yoo-Won (Team of Education and Research, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology)
  • 박태건 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구팀) ;
  • 이이다 코지 (홋카이도대학 대학원 해양생물자원과학전공) ;
  • 김욱성 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구팀) ;
  • 김성기 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구팀) ;
  • 김석재 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구팀) ;
  • 류경진 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구팀) ;
  • 이유원 (한국해양수산연수원 교육연구팀)
  • Received : 2015.03.11
  • Accepted : 2015.04.10
  • Published : 2015.05.31

Abstract

Hundreds of Steller sea lions, Eumetopias jubatus, migrate from Sakhalin and the northern Kuril Islands to Hokkaido in Japan every winter. During this migration, they may use their roaring sounds to navigate and to maintain their groups. We recorded the roars of wild Steller sea lions that had landed on reefs on the west coast of Hokkaido, and those of captive sea lions, while making video recordings. The fundamental frequency ($F_0$), Formant frequency ($F_1$), pulse repetition rate (PRR), and duration of syllables (T) were analyzed using a sonagraph. $F_0$, $F_1$, and PRR of the roars emitted by captive sea lions increased in the order male, female. By contrast, the $F_1$ of wild males was lower than that of females, while the $F_0$ and PRR of wild males and females did not differ statistically. These results suggest regional differences between the five groups showed that.

Keywords

References

  1. Charrier I, Mathevon N and Jouventin P. 2003. Vocal signature recognition of mothers by fur seal pups. Animal Behaviour 65, 543-550. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2073).
  2. Insley SJ. 2001. Mother-Offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical. Animal Behaviour 61, 129-137. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1569)
  3. Page B, Goldsworthy SD and Hindell MA. 2001. Vocal traits of hybrid fur seals: intermediate to their parental species. Animal Behaviour 61, 959-967. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1663).
  4. Phillips AV and Stirling I. 2000. Vocal individuality in mother and pup South American fur seals, Arctocephalus australis. Marine Mammal Sci 16, 592-616. (doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2000.tb00954.x).
  5. Takemura A, Yoshida K and Baba N. 1983. Distinction of individual Northern fur seal pups, Callorhinus ursinus, through their call. Bull Fac Fish Nagasaki Univ 54, 29-34.
  6. Thompson, PO, Findley LT and Vidal O. 1992. 20-Hz pulses and other vocali-zations of fin whales, Balaenoptera physalus, in the Gulf of California, Mexico. J Acoust Soc Am 92, 3051-3057. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.404201
  7. Trillmich F. 1981. Mutual mother-pup recognition in Galapagos fur seals and sea lions: Cues used and functional significance. Behaviour 78, 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853981X00248
  8. Van Parijs SM, Hastie GD, and Thompson PM. 1999. Geographical variation in temporal and spatial vocalization patterns of male harbour seals in the mating season. Animal Behaviour 58, 1231-1239. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1258).
  9. Van Parijs SM, Hastie GD and Thompson PM. 2000. Individual and geographical variation in display behaviour of male harbour seal in Scotland. Animal Behaviour 59, 559-568. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1307).
  10. Whitehead H. 1985. Humpback whale songs from the north Indian Ocean. Invest Cetacea 17, 157-162.