Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Gifted Programs Abroad for Economically Disadvantaged or Minority Students: The Cases of US, UK, Germany, Australia, and Israel

외국의 소외계층 학생을 위한 영재교육 프로그램 비교: 미국, 영국, 독일, 호주, 이스라엘 사례 중심으로

  • Received : 2015.06.03
  • Accepted : 2015.07.05
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study compared 14 programs for the economically disadvantaged or minority students with potentials in 5 countries - US, UK, Germany, Australia, and Israel, attempting contents and characters of Korean Head Start to be developed, that is the program for economically disadvantaged gifted students or students from multi-cultural families, who are gifted at risk of under-representation and under-achievement. School wide enrichment programs, which served all students with gifted programs, using RTI model in the pursuit of equity and excellence, turned out to be effective as early interventions and identification implemented for economically disadvantaged or minority students with potentials. Gifted programs for low Social Economic Status (SES) or minority students played a role as a bridge for disadvantaged students to get into a regular gifted program or even higher gifted schools and to have a competency to compete with affluent gifted students. The principles of the programs were acceleration and differentiation. Most programs also ran a parents' education and a mentor program to motivate and support disadvantaged students socially and emotionally. Collaboration among governmental offices and usage of external resources were more effective to support these students and the programs.

본 연구는 소외계층 및 다문화 가정의 영재 대상 한국형 헤드 스타트 영재교육 프로그램 개발을 위한 기초연구로 외국의 소외계층 영재교육 프로그램 비교분석을 통해 개발될 프로그램의 성격과 내용을 제안하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 미국, 영국, 독일 호주, 이스라엘의 소외계층 영재를 위한 14개 영재교육 프로그램을 목적, 선발 대상 및 방법, 내용, 효과에 따라 분석한 결과 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째 소외계층 영재교육 프로그램은 교육 격차를 좁히기 위해 조기 선발을 하며 중재반응(RTI)모형의 다층식(Tiered) 프로그램을 중재 프로그램으로 사용한다. 둘째 소외계층 영재교육 프로그램은 정규 교육과정안에서 확대된 학교 심화형태로 제공하여 영재교육의 형평성과 수월성을 추구한다. 셋째 소외계층 영재는 다면적, 역동적 평가를 통한 강점 중심의 선발 방식을 사용한다. 넷째 일반 영재교육 프로그램에 소외계층 영재가 들어갈 수 있도록 준비시켜주며, 가교 역할을 하는 과도기적 성격을 가진다. 다섯째 인지능력 발달 외에 사회 정서적 발달 프로그램과 진로 프로그램을 제공하며, 부모교육, 멘토링 등을 포함한다. 여섯째 프로그램의 효과적인 운영을 위해 외부의 다양한 자원을 활용하며 정부 부처 간의 협력을 구축한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2013). 제3차 영재교육진흥종합계획.
  2. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 제2차 영재교육진흥종합계획.
  3. 김경회, 곽창선 (2014). 이스라엘 영재교육의 특징과 시사점. 한국교원교육연구, 31(1), 243-265.
  4. 김미숙, 강병직, 김영아, 김인순, 박지은, 서예원, 유경재, 이희현, 전경남 (2009). 한국의 영재교육: 영재교육 현황과 국가표준 정립. CRM 2010-109. 서울: 교육개발원.
  5. 김미숙, 서지연, 김영아, 이희현, 전정민, 한은주 (2009). 소외계층 영재교육 프로젝트 S&S (Stand and Shine): 선발도구와 프로그램 개발. CRM 2009-29. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  6. 박지은, 이경숙, 정영옥, 서나래, 채현정 (2012). 해외관찰 . 추천도구 안내서. CRM 2012-170. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  7. 송경애 (2014). 소외계층 영재의 지능과 자아존중감, 수학적 태도 및 과학적 태도의 관계. 영재교육연구, 24(6), 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2014.24.6.1039
  8. 여성가족부 (2014). 다문화 학생 통계 현황 (14. 4월) 안내. http://www.moe.go.kr/web/100068/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=343&boardSeq=57128&mode=view (검색일: 2015. 4. 6).
  9. 이재분, 유경재, 여승수 (2011). 소외계층 영재학생 사례 발굴 및 지원 방안 연구. CR 2011-70. 서울: 한국교육개발원.
  10. 조성민, 전동렬 (2012). 경제적, 신체적 어려움이 있는 과학 영재의 학습 특성과 전술: 주말 물리교실 하늘이의 사례를 중심으로. 영재교육연구, 22(3), 729-755. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.3.729
  11. 한국교육개발원 (2015). 2014 통계연보 from https://ged.kedi.re.kr/stss/viewStatistic.do (검색일: 2015. 4. 27).
  12. Antoniades, C. B. (2014, April 11). Fairfax program seeks to close the 'excellence gap'. Washington Post. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/fairfax-program-seeks-to-close-the-excellence-gap/2014/04/10/21711a80-a2f0-11e3-84d4-e59b1709222c_story.html
  13. Bevan-Brown, J. (2011). Indigenous conception of giftedness. In W. Vialle, (Eds.), Giftedness from an indigenous perspective. Retrieved from March 23, 2015, from http://www.aaegt.net.au/DEEWR%20Books/02%20Indig.pdf
  14. Blanco, M. (2014). Strength-Based RTI. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 169-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514530115
  15. Borland, J. H., & Wright, L. (1994). Identifying young, potentially gifted, economically disadvantaged students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 64-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629403800202
  16. Borland, J. H. (2004). Issues and practices in the identification and education of gifted students from underrepresented groups. RM 04186. Retrieved April 6, 2015, from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/reports/rm04186/rm04186.pdf
  17. Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Examiner's manual: Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
  18. Callahan, C. M., Tomlinson, C. A., Moon, T. R., Tomchin, E. M., & Plucker, J. A. (1995). Project START: Using a multiple intelligences model in identifying and promoting talent in high-risk students. (Research Monograph 95136). Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  19. Cambridgeshire County council (2014). Narrowing the gap 2012-2014. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk
  20. Coleman, L. J., & Southern, W. T. (2006). Bring the potential of underserved children to the threshold of talent development. Gifted Child Today, 29(3), 35-39.
  21. Cooper, S. (2005). Gifted indigenous programs: Unmasking potential in minority cultures. Gifted Education International, 19, 114-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940501900205
  22. Coursen-Neff, Z. (2004). Discrimination against palestinian arab children in the Israeli educational system. International Law and Politics, 36, 101-162.
  23. Department for children, schools, and families (2007). Gifted and talented education guidance on preventing underachievement: A focus on children and young people in care. Retrieved from March 20, 2015, from http://www.teachfind.com/national-strategies/gifted-and-talentededucation-guidance-preventing-underachievement-%E2%80%93-focus-child
  24. Department for children, schools, and families (2009). Narrowing the Gaps: Resources to support the achievement of Black and minority ethnic, disadvantaged and gifted and talented pupils. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from https://www.essex.gov.uk/Business-Partners/Partners/Schools/One-to-one-tuition/Documents/narrowing%20the%20gap%20ethnic%20minority.pdf
  25. Deutsche Bank (2015, April 15). The Germany National Scholarship program creates opportunities. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from https://www.db.com/cr/en/concrete-the-german-nationalscholarship.htm?dbiquery=null%3Aacquires
  26. Eliezer, S. (1983). The gifted disadvantaged of Israel. ED242852. Retrieved March 23, 2015, from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED242852
  27. Ford, D. Y., & Harris III, J. J. (1996). Cultural Diversity: Challenges for gifted education: Recruiting and retaining diverse students in gifted education: Pitfalls and promises. Tempo, 16(2), 6-12
  28. Gavin, M. K., & Casa, T. M. (2012). Nurturing young student mathematicians. Gifted Education International, 29(2), 1-14.
  29. Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., & Carroll, S. R. (2013). The impact of advanced geometry and measurement curriculum units on the mathematics achievement of first-grade students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213479564
  30. Gross, M. U. M.(1999). Inequity in equity: The paradox of gifted education in Australia. Australian Journal of Education, 43(1), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419904300107
  31. Harradine, C. C., Coleman, M. R. B., & Winn, D. C. (2014). Recognizing academic potential in students of color: Findings of U-STARS-PLUS. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 1-11.
  32. Horn, C. V. (2015). Young scholars. Gifted Child Today, 38(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217514556532
  33. Ichilov, O., & Shacham, M. (1984). Interethnic contacts with gifted disadvantaged students: Effects on ethnic attitudes. Urban Education, 19(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/004208598401900301
  34. Jewish virtual library (2015). Learning together: Chapter III- Programs for the gifted, talented & very able. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Learning/three.html
  35. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company (2015). Project $M^2$: Mentoring Young Mathematicians. Retrieved May 7, 2015, from https://www.kendallhunt.com/m2/
  36. Kirschenbaum, R. J. (1998). Dynamic assessment and its use with underserved gifted and talented populations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 140-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200302
  37. Maker, C. J. (2005). The DISCOVER Project: Improving assessment and curriculum for diverse gifted learners. RM05206. Storrs, CT: NRCGT.
  38. Manning, S. (2005). Young leaders: Growing through mentoring. Gifted Child Today, 28(1), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2005-177
  39. McCann, M. (2005). Our greatest natural resource: Gifted education in Australia. Gifted Education International, 19, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940501900203
  40. Moon, T. R., & Callahan, C. M. (2001). Curricular modifications, family outreach and a mentoring program: Impacts on achievement and gifted identification in high-risk primary students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(4), 305-321 https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320102400402
  41. Moore, J. L. III, Ford, D. Y., & Milner, H. R. (2005). Recruitment is not enough : Retaining African American students in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900106
  42. Naglieri, J. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2001). Understanding intelligence, giftedness and creativity using the pass theory. Roeper Review, 23(3), 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554087
  43. National Association Gifted Children(2014). Talent Act. Retrieved Mar. 3, 2015 from www.nage.org/print/391
  44. NSW Department of Education and Training (2004). Policy and implementation strategies for the education of gifted and talented students. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/policies/gats/assets/pdf/polsuppcd.pdf#page=18
  45. NSW Department of Education and Training (2011). Case studies. Retrieved April 20, 2015, from http://www.curriculumsupport.education.nsw.gov.au/beststart/information/index.htm
  46. Olszewsk-Kublius, P., Lee, S., Ngoi, M., & Ngoi, D. (2004). Addressing the achievement gap between minority and nonminority children by increasing access to gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(2), 127-158. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320402800202
  47. Olszewsk-Kublius, P. (2010). Working with academically gifted students in urban settings issues and lessons learned. In J. L. VanTassel-Baska (Eds.), Patterns and profiles of promising learners from poverty (pp. 85-106). Waco, TX: PRUFROCK.
  48. Olszewsk-Kublius, P., & Thomson, D. L. (2010). Gifted programming for poor or minority urban students: Issues and lessons learned. Gifted Child Today, 33(4), 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751003300413
  49. Olszewsk-Kublius, P., & Clarenbach, J. (2012). Unlocking emergent talent: Supporting high achievement of low income, high ability students. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
  50. Sarouphim, K. M. (1999). DISCOVER: A promising alternative assessment for the identification of gifted minorities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 244-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300403
  51. Shoshana, A. (2011). When the hybrid met the therapeutic: Discursive orders in every day life. Anthropological Theory, 11(2), 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611407390
  52. Shumueli, E. (1983). The gifted disadvantaged of Israel. Manila conference on Education for the Gifted and Talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 242852)
  53. Smilansky, M., & Nevo, D. (1971). Secondary boarding schools for gifted students from culturally disadvantaged students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 054239). Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED054239.pdf
  54. Springate, I., Atkinson, M., Straw, S., Lamont, E., & Grayson, H. (2008). Narrowing the gap in outcomes: Early years(0-5 years). Slough: NFER.
  55. UCONN. (2015). Project $M^2$. Retrieved May 14, 2015, from http://projectm2.uconn.edu/team.html
  56. US Department of Education (2015). Jacob K. Javits gifted and talented students education project abstracts. Retrieved April 22, 2015, from http://findit.ed.gov/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&affiliate=ed.gov&query=javits
  57. VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620204600204