Exploring Recipients' Experience with the Home-based Rehabilitation Program Based on CBR Model through In-depth Interviews

  • Received : 2015.03.24
  • Accepted : 2015.04.19
  • Published : 2015.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted in order to explore self-perceived objectives, effects, determinant factors of satisfaction and demands on home-based rehabilitation service (HBRS) based on a community-based rehabilitation (CBR) model in community-dwelling disabilities. Methods: This research was conducted through in-depth interview. HBRS was conducted by four physical therapists for one hour a day, once a week, for eight weeks. After an eight-week intervention period, in-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured questionnaire for five recipients of HBRS and six care givers. Results: For the physical effect, some participants experienced positive effects, whereas others did not due to the short-term intervention period. For the social and emotional effects, 'occurrence of motivation for exercise', 'change of surroundings' and 'sorriness for the therapist' emerged as keywords. For the determinant factors of satisfaction, 'movement-inducing therapy', 'therapy from the specialist', 'development of friendship & social network', and 'learning the way of self-rehabilitation' emerged as keywords. For further demands on HBRS, participants stated that 'sufficient time for therapy', 'user opinion-reflected therapy', 'additional instructions for therapeutic exercise & activities of daily living', and 'active promotion for HBRS' were necessary. Conclusion: Participants were satisfied with the physical, social, emotional, and educational aspects of HBRS. In particular, the participants regarded educational aspects as the significant factor throughout self-perceived objectives, determinant factors of satisfaction and the demands. This result suggests that when providing HBRS to community-dwelling persons with disabilities, therapists should recognize the necessity and significance not only of the physical, but also the educational aspect of HBRS.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. The actual condition of the disabilities. 2011.
  2. Word Health Organization. Community-based rehabilitation guidelines. 2010.
  3. National Rehabilitation Center. Guideline for the community-based integrated health promotion program. 2013.
  4. Kim M. The study of efficient way of home-based physical therapy. Sahmyook University. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. 2011.
  5. Kim HJ. A study for the introduction of home rehabilitation services in long-term care insurance system for the elderly. Inje University. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. 2010.
  6. Yang YA, An SJ, Park YH, et al. A study of visiting Rehabilitation service and implementation method. KAPA. 2011;3(1):59-70.
  7. Yoon TH. A study of the inclusion of home-based physical therapy services in the long-term care insurance. Hanyang University. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. 2009.
  8. Park SK, Heo JW, Yang DJ, et al. Effects of home visiting physical therapy and environmental factors analysis using international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Kor Phys Ther. 2012;24(4): 282-89.
  9. Park SK, Ji HY, Heo JW. Effects of home visiting physical therapy on activities of daily living and function in disabled persons living at home. J Kor Phys Ther. 2011;23(2):61-8. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.61
  10. Kim SM, Song JM. The efficacy of community-based rehabilitation exercise to improve physical function in old women with knee arthritis. J Kor Phys Ther. 2010;22(1):9-17.
  11. An D. Effects on improvement of activities of daily living through shortterm home visiting physical therapy. Phys Ther Kor. 2007;14(2):53-60.
  12. Yoon TY, Kim HR, Park RJ. A survey on home care team's perception in health center about home-based physical therapy among home care service for long term care insurance. KPTSA. 2009;16(3):43-53.
  13. Lee MS, Kim MC, Kim GY. A study for home-based physical therapy service introduction through a group of professionals in-depth interview. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2013;8(3):303-15. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2013.8.3.303
  14. Kwon HJ, Hwang SS. A review on the needs and understanding about the home physical therapy system. KOHAC. 2005;2(2):83-99.
  15. Son KH, Kim EK, Kim SM. Research about necessity of visiting home physical therapy. KPTSA. 2012;19(1):27-38.
  16. Choi S, Yoon J. Awareness and demand for pediatric home-based physical therapy in Korea. Phys Ther Kor. 2013;20(3):62-73. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2013.20.3.062
  17. Jang MS. Needs for activation of community based rehabilitation (CBR): qualitative study and questionnaire survey. Inje University. Dissertation of Doctoral Degree. 2013.
  18. Yi C, Weon J, Ok J. House visits by physical therapist and patient needs. Phys Ther Kor. 2000;7(1):64-78.
  19. Ahn CS, Yu WJ. A study of management and satisfaction for home visiting physical therapy. J Korean Soc Phys Med. 2012;7(3):241-50. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2012.7.3.241
  20. Junggu office. Current situation of registration of each type of the disabilities. 2013.
  21. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45(3):214-22. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.3.214
  22. Medical technicians, etc. act. Ministry of health and welfare, 2011.
  23. Korea Health Promotion Foundation. Guideline for home visiting health service. 2013.