The Effects of Seat Surface Inclination on Forward Reaching in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy

  • Jeong, Jeong Yun (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Medical Science, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Lee, Ho-Cheol (School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, College of Engineering, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Shin, Hwa-Kyung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Health, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • Received : 2015.03.24
  • Accepted : 2015.04.21
  • Published : 2015.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: Impaired reaching movement is commonly observed in children with cerebral palsy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the inclination of seat surface can influence the reaching movement in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP). Methods: The subjects were 31 children, 16 children with spastic bilateral CP and 15 typically developing (TD) children. The children performed static sitting and forward reaching under three conditions: a horizontal seat surface (Horizontal $0^{\circ}$), a seat surface inclined anterior 15 degrees (Ant $15^{\circ}$), and a seat surface inclined posterior 15 degrees (Post $15^{\circ}$). A 3-axis accelerometer ('ZSTAR3') was used for analysis of the reaching movement. A 3-axis accelerometer was attached on the manubrium of the sternum, lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and styloid process of the ulna. We measured the reaction time, movement time, and data amount during reaching the 8 cm target with an index finger on the three inclined seat surfaces. Results: Reaction time and movement time for CPs showed significant delay; comparing the TD's and CP's amount was significantly greater than the TD's during reaching task (p<0.05). In particular, CP's reaction time and movement time on a seat surface inclined Ant $15^{\circ}$ was significantly more delayed compared with the other seat surfaces (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our results suggest that seat-inclination intervention may provide an ergonomic approach for children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Keywords

References

  1. Page SJ, Elovic E, Levine P, et al. Modified constraint-induced therapy and botulinum toxin a: A promising combination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(1):76-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-200301000-00014
  2. Saxena S, Rao BK, Kumaran S. Analysis of postural stability in children with cerebral palsy and children with typical development: An observational study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26(3):325-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0000000000000060
  3. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice third edition Liooincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007.
  4. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, et al. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(2):171-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-001-0976-6
  5. Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol. 1954;47(6):381-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392
  6. Bax MC, Flodmark O, Tydeman C. Definition and classification of cerebral palsy. From syndrome toward disease. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:39-41.
  7. Sritipsukho P, Mahasup N. Correlations between gross motor functions and health-related quality of life in thai children with spastic diplegia. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014;97 Suppl 8:S199-204.
  8. Bangash AS, Hanafi MZ, Idrees R, et al. Risk factors and types of cerebral palsy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(1):103-7.
  9. Heyrman L, Feys H, Molenaers G, et al. Altered trunk movements during gait in children with spastic diplegia: Compensatory or underlying trunk control deficit? Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(9):2044-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.031
  10. Sandlund M, Domellof E, Grip H,, et al. Training of goal directed arm movements with motion interactive video games in children with cerebral palsy-a kinematic evaluation. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(5):318-26. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.776124
  11. Shin HK, Ryu YU. The effects of seat surface inclination on the onset of muscle contraction during sit-to-stand in healthy adult. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2012;24(6):383-7.
  12. Tsai YS, Yu YC, Huang PC,, et al. Seat surface inclination may affect postural stability during boccia ball throwing in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(12):3568-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.033
  13. Bergen AF. Physical rehabilitation assessment and treatment. Philadelphia, F.A. davis 1994.
  14. Naslund A, Sundelin G, Hirschfeld H. Reach performance and postural adjustmentsduring standing in children with severe spastic diplegia using dynamic ankle-foot orthoses. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(9):715-23. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0121
  15. Nwaobi OM, Brubaker CE, Cusick B,, et al. Electromyographic investigation of extensor activity in cerebral-palsied children in different seating positions. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1983;25(2):175-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1983.tb13741.x
  16. McClenaghan BA, Thombs L, Milner M. Effects of seat-surface inclination on postural stability and function of the upper extremities of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1992;34(1):40-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1992.tb08561.x
  17. Hadders-Algra M, van der Heide JC, Fock JM,, et al. Effect of seat surface inclination on postural control during reaching in preterm children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2007;87(7):861-71. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060330
  18. Barbara ABS, Glen G, Marjorie S, et al. Willard and spackman's occupational therapy. LWW, 2013.