Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society (한국안광학회지)

The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society (한국안광학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Direction and Level of Dominant Eye According to the Tests

검사방법에 따른 우세안의 방향 및 강도의 비교

  • Shim, Jun-Beom (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health University) ;
  • Joo, Seok-Hee (Dept. of Optometry and Vision Science, Sehan University) ;
  • Shim, Hyun-Suk (Dept. of Ophthalmic Optics, Gwangju Health University)
  • 심준범 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 주석희 (세한대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 심현석 (광주보건대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.05
  • Accepted : 2015.09.01
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, dominant eye is monitoring and level of dominant was measured in subjective and objective test. Methods: The average age of 21.08 years old of 129 adult (69 male, 60 female) who was no underlying ocular disease were participated in this study. dominant eye was determined by monocular instrument in subjecttive test and using a thin ring ($3.8cm{\times}3.8cm$) in objective test and level of dominant was measured direction of movement of the thin rim. Results: In the subjective test, there are 100 (77.52%) subjects whose dominant eye was right eye, and 29 (22.48%) subjects whose dominant eye was left eye. In the objective test, 90 (69.77%) subjects had right eye d and 33 (25.58%) subjects had left eye, as dominant eye, and 6 (4.65%) subjects had no dominant eye. Comparison of subjective test and objective test by dominant eye were equal in the 104 (80.62%) subjects, unequal in the 19 (14.73%) and center 6 (4.65%) subjects. The level of dominant eye in objective dominant eye test, there were middle 52 (57.78%) subjects, high 38 (42.22%) subjects in the right eye, and middle 25 (75.76%) subjects, high 8 (24.24%) subjects in the left eye. Conclusions: In this study O - Ring Test hasadvantage of direction and level of dominant eye, and middle or center dominant eye was shown in unequal. From this results, testing of dominant eye should be relationship equal and unequal, also required to be study in dominant eye level in binocular vision.

목적: 본 연구에서는 자각적, 타각적 방법을 각각 이용하여 우세안, 비우세안을 비교 하였고 그에 따른 우세안의 강도를 측정하였다. 방법: 기저질환이 없는 평균연령 21.08세인 성인 129명(남69, 여60)을 대상으로 렌즈미터 접안렌즈를 이용한 자각적인 방법과 손잡이가 달린 $3.8cm{\times}3.8cm$ 직경의 가는 링을 이용한 타각적인 방법으로 우세안, 비우세안을 비교 하였고, 또한 림의 이동방향에 따라 우세안의 강도를 측정하였다. 결과: 자각적인 방법은 우안 우세안 100명(77.52%), 좌안 우세안 29명(22.48%)으로 나타났다. 타각적인 방법의 우세안은 우안 90명(69.77%), 좌안 33명(25.58%), 방향성이 없는 정중앙은 6명(4.65%)으로 나타났다. 자타각적 비교 결과 모두 동측의 방향성(일치)을 나타낸 경우는 104명(80.62%), 교차성(불일치)의 경우는 19명(14.73%), 기타 6명(4.65%)로 나타났다. 타각적인 방법에 따른 우세안의 강도는 우안의 경우 전체 90명 중 Middle 52명(57.78%), High 38명(42.22%)으로 나타났고 좌안의 경우 전체 33명 중 Middle 25명(75.76%), High 8명(24.24%)로 나타났다. 결론: 우세안은 검사방법에 따라 방향이 다르게 나타날 수 있다. 본 연구에서 실행한 O-Ring Test는 우세안의 강도를 파악할 수 있는 장점이 있었고, 우세안의 강도가 약하거나 중간 강도의 우세안을 가진 경우 교차성일 가능성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 선행 연구와 더불어 본 연구를 바탕으로 우세안 방향의 일치성과 불일치성의 관계 및 우세안의 강도에 따른 양안시기능 등 다양한 연구가 계속되어야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho KJ, Kim SY, Yang SW. The refractive errors of dominant and non-dominant eyes. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2009;50(2):275-279. https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2009.50.2.275
  2. Romano PE. Ocular dominance: right, left, or central [Editorial]. Binocular Vision and Eye Muscle Surgery. 1995;10:15-16.
  3. Coren S, Kaplan CP. Patterns of ocular dominance. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry. 1973;50(4):283. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197304000-00002
  4. Koo BS, Cho YA. The relationship of dominant eye, dominant hand, and deviated eye in strabismus. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;37(8):1277-82.
  5. Choi JS, Ko CJ. A study on dominant eye. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 1983;24(3):459-62.
  6. Porac C, Whitford FW, Coren S. The relationship between eye dominance and monocular acuity: an additional consideration. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53(12):803-806. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197612000-00007
  7. Porac C, Coren S. Sighting dominance and binocular rivalry. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1978;55(3):208-213. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197803000-00011
  8. Leem HS, Wi DG, Joo SH. The relationship of dominant eyes and fixing eyes in binocular anomalies. Korean J Vis Sci. 2010;12(3):173-179.
  9. Park HJ, Yoo GC, Kim JM. The relationship between dominant eye and visual functions. Korean J Vis Sci. 2000;2(1):25-32.
  10. Coren S. Sensorimotor performance as a function of eye dominance and handedness. Perceptual and motor skills. 1999;88(2):424-426. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.424
  11. Nitta M, K Shimizu, T Niida. The influence of ocular dominance on monovision-the influence of strength of ocular dominance on visual functions. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2007;111(6):441-446.
  12. Brackenridge CJ. The contribution of genetic factors to ocular dominance. Behavior Genetics. 1982;12(3):319-325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067851
  13. Portal JM, Romano PE. Patterns of eye-hand dominance in baseball players. New England Journal of Medicine. 1988;319(10):655-656. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198809083191018
  14. Laby DM, Kirschen DG, Rosenbaum AL, Mellman MF. The effect of ocular dominance on the performance of professional baseball players. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(5):864-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(98)95027-8
  15. Seijas O, Gmez de Liao P, Gmez de Liao R, Roberts CJ, Piedrahita E, Diaz E. Ocular dominance diagnosis and its influence in monovision. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(2):209-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.03.053
  16. Revital GM, Aharon Arlazoroff, Zeevi Dvir. Ocular dominance and balance performance in healthy adults. Gait & Posture. 2010;31(3):394-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.015
  17. Nuthmann A, Kliegl R. An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision. 2009;9(5):31.
  18. Cheng CY, Yen MY, Lin HY, Hsia WW, Hsu WM. Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(8):2856-2860. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.03-0878
  19. Lee HJ. The influence of accommodation of eye on ametropic dominant eye. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 1997; 2(1):149-154.

Cited by

  1. Measured Kappa Angles by Photographing vol.20, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2015.20.4.485
  2. Comparison of Dynamic Stereoacuity According to Dominant Eye and Degree of Dominant Eye vol.21, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.3.227
  3. A Study on Distance Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity According to Degree of Eye Dominance vol.22, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.4.435
  4. Comparison of Amount of at Distance and Near Phoria in Dominant Eye and Non-dominant Eye by Von Graefe Method vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.2.111
  5. Consistency of Results Between Dominant Eye Tests : The Effect of Degree of Eye Dominance vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.4.401
  6. Contrast Sensitivity of Dominant and Non-Dominant Eyes in Adults vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.4.433
  7. Comparison of Visual Acuity between Dominant Eye and Non-Dominant Eye vol.21, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17337/jmbi.2019.21.2.219
  8. A Study on Correlation between Degree of Eye Dominance and Binocular Visual Function: Focusing on Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, Static Stereopsis vol.24, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2019.24.3.261
  9. Direction Changes in the Dominant Eye and Comparison of Single-Eye Inset Amounts Depending on the View Distance vol.25, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2020.25.1.19