DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enhancing Cellulase Production in Thermophilic Fungus Myceliophthora thermophila ATCC42464 by RNA Interference of cre1 Gene Expression

  • Yang, Fan (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Shenzhen University) ;
  • Gong, Yanfen (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Bioresources and Ecology) ;
  • Liu, Gang (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Shenzhen University) ;
  • Zhao, Shengming (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Shenzhen University) ;
  • Wang, Juan (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Shenzhen University)
  • Received : 2015.01.16
  • Accepted : 2015.03.22
  • Published : 2015.07.28

Abstract

The role of CRE1 in a thermophilic fungus, Myceliophthora thermophila ATCC42464, was studied using RNA interference. In the cre1-silenced strain C88, the filter paper hydrolyzing activity and β-1,4-endoglucanase activity were 3.76-, and 1.31-fold higher, respectively, than those in the parental strain when the strains were cultured in inducing medium for 6 days. The activities of β-1,4-exoglucanase and cellobiase were 2.64-, and 5.59-fold higher, respectively, than those in the parental strain when the strains were cultured for 5 days. Quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction showed that the gene expression of egl3, cbh1, and cbh2 was significantly increased in transformant C88 compared with the wild-type strain. Therefore, our findings suggest the feasibility of improving cellulase production by modifying the regulator expression, and an attractive approach to increasing the total cellulase productivity in thermophilic fungi.

Keywords

Introduction

Recently, thermostable enzymes from thermophilic fungi have become a significant focus of research [19]. Extracellular enzymes produced by thermophilic fungi might be more active and stable under extreme conditions [14]. Enzymes with thermal stability have advantages in the production of chemicals and biomass-based fuels. Myceliophthora thermophila ATCC42464 is a thermophilic fungus that can be cultured at 45℃. Its genome has been analyzed from telomere to telomere [3]. The fungus is capable of hydrolyzing all major polysaccharides found in biomass, thereby representing a potential reservoir of thermostable enzymes [3].

Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) is an important mechanism for controlling metabolic processes in prokaryotes and eukaryotic microorganisms. The expression of genes necessary for the use of alternative carbon sources is repressed in the presence of easily metabolized carbon sources such as glucose [27]. In Trichoderma reesei and other fungi, the key regulator of CCR is the Cys2His2-type transcription factor CRE1 [1]. CRE1-related transcriptional regulators exist widely in mesophilic fungi, such as Neurospora crassa [6, 29], T. reesei [9, 27], Aspergillus niger [7], and Fusarium oxysporum [10]. It is orthologous to CreA from Aspergillus sp. [7, 11, 28]. Additionally, the function of Mig1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is similar to that of CRE1 [22]. Mig1 represses the transcription of about 90 genes associated with the use of alternative carbon sources, including sucrose, galactose, and maltose, when glucose is sufficient [25].

Compared with studies in mesophilic fungi, research on the regulation of cellulase gene expression in thermophilic fungi is relatively limited [15]. Nevertheless, consensus sequences of a potential regulatory element have been identified in the 5’ upstream region of thermophilic fungal cellulase genes [5, 12, 26, 30], and the cre1 gene from two hermophilic fungi (Talaromyces emersonii and Thermoascus aurantiacus) was cloned (GenBank AF440004.4 and AY604200.1, respectively). However, the function of these regulators has not yet been reported.

In this study, the cre1 homologous gene Mtcre1 was identified in the genome of M. thermophila ATCC42464. Compared with cellulase-related transcriptional regulators in Humicola grisea var. thermoidea, N. crassa OR74A, F. oxysporum FOSC 3-a, T. reesei QM6a, and A. niger CBS 513.88, the amino acid sequence (GenBank AEO60646.1) of MtCRE1 shares 76%, 67%, 61%, 60%, and 54% homology, respectively. However, the role of MtCRE1 in the regulation of the major cellulolytic genes in M. thermophila is unknown. The objective of this work was to validate the role of MtCRE1 in M. thermophila using RNA interference (RNAi) and to determine whether cellulase production could be improved. We constructed cre1-silenced recombinant strains and detected cellulase activities under inducing conditions. The zymograms between the tranformant and wild-type strain were analyzed. The different proteins were identified through mass spectrometry. The results indicated that MtCRE1 acts as a repressor for cellulase expression, and silencing of cre1 effectively improves cellulase production in M. thermophila.

 

Materials and Methods

Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions

Escherichia coli JM107 (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) was used for plasmid manipulations. The M. thermophila strain (ATCC42464) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and used as the parent strain throughout this study. E. coli was maintained on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium, in which ampicillin (100 µg/ml) was supplemented as necessary. M. thermophila was maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA). The spores were washed with a 2% Tween-20 solution before spore suspension.

For enzyme production, a total of 1 × 107 M. thermophila spores that were collected from cultures grown on PDA plates were inoculated into 30 ml of basal medium supplemented with 5% corncob powder and 3% wheat bran in a 250 ml conical flask and grown at 45℃ with shaking at 250 rpm. The basal medium contained 0.3% peptone, 0.2% (NH4)2SO4, 0.05% yeast extract, 0.4% KH2PO4, 0.03% CaCl2·2H2O, 0.03% MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.02% Tween-20. The pUC-19-pdc plasmid contains the promoter and terminator of the pyruvate decarboxylase gene of M. thermophila (Ppdc and Tpdc, respectively) and was previously constructed in our laboratory. Plasmid pAN7-1 was used in the co-transformation of M. thermophila. PDA medium supplemented with 50 µg/ml hygromycin B was used to select transformants.

Construction of the RNAi Vector

The cre1 gene sequence (XM_003665843.1) was acquired from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). A small interfering RNA (siRNA) design program (http://rnaidesigner.lifetechnologies.com/rnaiexpress/) was used to design siRNA sequences of the target gene. The oligonuleotide sequences are shown in Table 1. The stable stem-loop structure 5’-TTCAAGAGA-3’ connected the complementary oligonucleotides (underlined and double underlined in Table 1), which can produce a hairpin siRNA during transcription [4]. The double-stranded siRNA-cre1 can be gained from polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with a reaction system consisting of 40% nuclease-free water, 20% annealing buffer for DNA oligos (5×), 20% DNA oligo S (50 µM), and 20% DNA oligoA (50 µM). The PCR protocol consisted of initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min and then falling 0.1°C per second until the temperature was 25°C . Finally, the doublestranded siRNA-cre1 with a cohesive terminus was inserted into the pUC-19-pdc plasmid. Sequence analysis was performed (Sangon, Shanghai, China) to verify the insertion of the siRNA-cre1 in the recombinant vector.

Table 1.Note: The 5’ end of the sense and antisense siRNA sequences are NotI and XbaI restriction sites, respectively (italics). Underlined and double underlined sequences are complementary oligonucleotides. The shaded sequences are stem-loop structures.

Fungal Transformations and Isolation of Single-Copy Transformants

The protoplast preparation and transformation of M. thermophila have not been reported previously. We referenced the method of T. reesei RUT-C30 described previously [21] with the following modifications. Lysing enzymes (10 mg/ml) from T. harzianum (Sigma-Aldrich, Brondby, Denmark) in 1 M MgSO4 was used for protoplast formation. The heat shock temperature was 60°C for 2 min. PDA medium supplemented with 20 mg/ml hygromycin B was used to select transformants. The single colonies were screened from hygromycin B-containing selection plates. Then, the colonies were screened using PCR analysis of genomic DNA. Three primers (Table 2) were designed to verify the integration of the siRNA-cre1 in the genome. Upstream primers siRNA-cre1-F and siRNA-Ppdc-F were paired with downstream primer siRNATpdc-R to selecting cre1-silenced transformants.

Table 2.Primer sequences used for verifying the recombinant vector and qRT-PCR.

Nucleic Acid Isolation

Fungal genomic DNA was extracted from frozen mycelia using a fungal DNA extraction kit (Sangon). Total RNA was isolated from frozen mycelia by Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were measured with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrometer, and RNA integrity was assessed by standard denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis.

Quantitative Reverse-Transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)

Up to 1 µg of total RNA and RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China) were prepared for the reverse-transcription reaction on ice. According to the SYBR Green qPCR (Takara) manufacturer’s instructions, the reverse-transcription reaction solution is to be introduced to a real-time PCR system using an ABI Prism 7300 System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The PCR protocol consisted of 30 sec of initial denaturation at 95°C and then 40 cycles of 5 sec at 95°C and 30 sec at 60°C; melting curve analysis followed with 1 cycle of 15 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C, and 15 sec at 95°C. Gene expression levels in the different samples were determined using the ∆∆CT method [17]. The βtubulin (tub) gene (GenBank AEO58945.1) of M. thermophila was used as an endogenous control. All samples were carried out in triplicate within a plate. The means ± standard deviations of the replicates are shown in the figures. Primers (Table 2) were designed so that the size of the amplicon was 80–200 bp, and complementary sequences within primers and mismatches were avoided.

Fig. 1.Schematic representation of the RNA interference vector. Ppdc, pdc promoter of Myceliophthora thermophila; siRNA-cre1, small interfering RNA sequences including the cre1 sense sequence, stem-loop, and cre1 antisense sequence; Tpdc, pdc terminator of M. thermophila.

Enzyme Activity Assays

Filter paper hydrolyzing activity (FPA), β-1,4-exoglucanase (CBH) activity, β-1,4-endoglucanase (EG) activity, and cellobiase (BG) activity were measured according to the method of Eveleigh et al. [8]. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 µmol product per minute. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate–Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Identification of Different Proteins

The fermented supernatant of the original strain and the transformant were analyzed by SDS-PAGE on a 12% polyacrylamide gel as described by Laemmli [13]. The protein bands were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The protein bands that differed between the original strain and the transformant were excised, transferred to a PCR tube with 100 µl of ultrapure water, washed, and destained on a temperaturecontrolled board at 25℃. Pretreatment used the in-gel digestion method of Li et al. [16]. The proteins were identified using matrixassisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight (MALDI TOF/TOF) mass spectrometry (Applied Biosystems), according to the method of Rauscher et al. [23]. To identify the protein sequences, a homology search was performed using Mascot software (ver. 2.2, Matrix Science). The partial amino acid sequences were used to identify analogous proteins through a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool search of the NCBI protein sequence database.

Stability Analysis of cre1-Silenced Strains

To test the stability of cellulase production in the cre1-silenced transformant, the transformant strains were subcultured for four rounds (one round lasted 5 days) on solid medium containing hygromycin B, and the cellulase activity with filter paper as the substrate was analyzed.

 

Results

Construction of M. thermophila cre1-Silenced Strains

To silence the expression of the cre1 gene in M. thermophila, a recombinant RNAi plasmid was transformed into M. thermophila ATCC42464 with the aid of plasmid pAN7-1 through co-transformation. More than 20 single colonies were screened from hygromycin B-containing selection plates. Then, the colonies were verified by PCR analysis of genomic DNA. In total, five colonies contained the cre1-interference sequence. The transformants were grown on a cellulase-inducing medium that contained corncob powder and wheat bran, and the expression level of cre1 was analyzed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2). The mRNA level of cre1 in the five transformants (C84, C85, C86, C87, and C88) was 68.6%, 29.9%, 47.3%, 10.8%, and 1.2%, respectively, of that of the original strain (100%). Finally, transformant C88, with the best RNAi efficiency, was selected for subsequent studies. The above results indicated that the silencing of cre1 in strain C88 was achieved through RNAi under inducing conditions.

Fig. 2.Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis of the cre1 mRNA levels in the M. thermophila transformants under inducing conditions.

Silencing of cre1-Enhanced Cellulase Production in M. thermophila

The parental strain and RNAi-mediated cre1-silencing strain C88 were grown in basal medium with corncob powder and wheat bran. The FPA, CBH, EG, and BG activities of the two strains were measured. In the cre1-silenced strain C88, FPA and EG activity was 3.76-, and 1.31-fold higher, respectively, than that in the parental strain when the strains were cultured in inducing medium for 6 days (Figs. 3A and 3B). The activities of CBH and BG were 2.64-, and 5.59-fold higher, respectively, than that in the parental strain when the strains were cultured for 5 days (Figs. 3C and 3D). The FPA and EG activities peaked at 6 days. The CBH and BG activities peaked at 5 days. The qRT-PCR results showed that the gene expression of egl3, cbh1, and cbh2 was significantly increased in the transformant compared with the wild-type strain (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.Cellulase activities of the original strain and tranformants. (A), (B), (C), and (D) are the filter paper (FP), β-1,4-endoglucanase (EG), β-1,4-exoglucanase (CBH; exocellulase), and cellobiase (BG) activities, respectively.

Fig. 4.Expression of the main cellulase genes in the cre1-silenced transformant under inducing conditions.

The total protein production of C88 was 1.31- and 1.22-fold higher than that of the parent strain under inducing conditions after culture for 5 and 6 days, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.Total protein production of the transformant and original strain under inducing conditions.

This result indicated that cellulase activity and total protein production were enhanced in the transformant.

Mass Spectrometry of Proteins That Differed Between the Parent Strain and the Transformant

Proteins secreted into the culture medium were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5). The bands that differed between the parent and transformant strains were excised and identified using MALDI TOF/TOF mass spectrometry. The MS data showed that three endoglucanases and five cellobiohydrolases were differentially produced in the transformant. These bands included various glucoside hydrolases belonging to the GH 5, 6, 7, 16, and 25 families (Table 4).

Fig. 5.Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of the transformant and original strain. M: protein ladder 1; A–F: Culture filtrate of the parent strain (Mt) and transformant (C88) cultured for 4–6 days. A, C, and E are Mt cultured for 4, 5, and 6 days, respectively. B, D, and F are C88 cultured for 4, 5, and 6 days, respectively. Bands 1–12 in red boxes were excised and identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-offlight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Table 4.Identification of different proteins between the transformant and original strain using MS.

 

Discussion

In this study, the effects of cre1 on cellulase expression, cellulase activity, and the amount of extracellular protein produced in the cre1-silenced transformant (C88) were investigated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of RNAi technology in M. thermophila. The hairpin-type RNAi construct could be useful for fungal silencing genes as reported for ace1 and cre1 in T. koningii [31, 32]. In this study, the interference produced a satisfactory effect. The mRNA level of cre1 in transformant C88 was only 1.2% of that in the original strain. The cellulase activity was similar between the C88 after four rounds of subculture and the primary strain during cultivation. Importantly, the interference sequence could be detected in the genome of the subcultured C88 strain by PCR, suggesting that the gene silencing in M. thermophila was rather stable.

CRE1 directly suppresses cbh1 transcription by binding to two closely spaced 5’-CCCCAC-3’ motifs in the cbh1 promoter region in Hypocrea jecorina [18]. Deletion or mutation of cre1 caused an increase in the cbh1 transcript level under repressing conditions [24]. CRE1 is involved indirectly in the control of cbh2 expression by regulating the main inducer XYR1 [18]. About 250 genes are under the regulatory influence of CRE1. These genes encode enzymes involved in plant cell wall degradation, nitrogen uptake, developmental processes, components of the transcriptional mediator complex, and chromatin remodeling, supporting a role for CRE1 as a cell-wide regulator [22]. In this study, we also observed differences in the transcript levels of four cellulase genes, egl1, egl3, cbh1, and cbh2. The relative transcript ratio of the last three genes was significantly increased in the transformant relative to the wild-type strain. However, the enzyme activities did not increase so dramatically. Recent research suggests that a substantial fraction of regulatory genetic variants influence gene expression at all levels from mRNA to steady-state protein abundance; a number of effects have a specific impact on particular expression phenotypes [2]. Therefore, the expression level of RNA is not related to the protein abundance at any time, which can explain the contradiction between the enzyme activity and transcript level of egl3, cbh1, and cbh2 in C88.

The downregulation of cre1 plays an important role in enhancing enzyme production in T. reesei [20]. In our previous study, the silenceing of cre1 also improves cellulase and xylanase expression, indicating that cre1 represses the basal expression level of xyr1 in T. koningii [31]. In the present study, the role of CRE1 was verified in the thermophilic fungus M. thermophila ATCC42464 through RNAi. Therefore, our findings suggest the feasibility of improving cellulase production by modifying the expression of regulators in thermophilic fungi. Thus, mechanisms of cellulase gene regulation in thermophilic fungi may share certain similarities with those in mesophilic fungi.

References

  1. Antoniêto AC, Dos Santos Castro L, Silva-Rocha R, Persinoti GF, Silva RN. 2014. Defining the genome-wide role of CRE1 during carbon catabolite repression in Trichoderma reesei using RNA-Seq analysis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 73C: 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2014.10.009
  2. Battle A, Khan Z, Wang SH, Mitrano A, Ford MJ, Pritchard JK, Gilad Y. 2014. Impact of regulatory variation from RNA to protein. Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1260793.
  3. Berka RM, Grigoriev IV, Otillar R, Salamov A, Grimwood J, Reid I, et al. 2011. Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris. Nat. Biotechnol. 29: 922-927. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1976
  4. Brummelkamp TR, Bernards R, Agami R. 2002. A system for stable expression of short interfering RNAs in mammalian cells. Science 296: 550-553. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068999
  5. Collins CM, Murray PG, Denman S, Morrissey JP, Byrnes L, Teeri TT, Tuohy MG. 2007. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of two distinct beta-glucosidase genes, bg1 and aven1, with very different biological roles from the thermophilic, saprophytic fungus Talaromyces emersonii. Mycol. Res. 111: 840-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.05.007
  6. De la Serna I, Ng D, Tyler BM. 1999. Carbon regulation of ribosomal genes in Neurospora crassa occurs by a mechanism which does not require Cre1, the homologue of the Aspergillus carbon catabolite repressor, CreA. Fungal Genet. Biol. 26: 253-269. https://doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.1999.1121
  7. Drysdale MR, Kolze SE, Kelly JM. 1993. The Aspergillus niger carbon catabolite repressor encoding gene, creA. Gene 130: 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90425-3
  8. Eveleigh DE, Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C. 2009. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2: 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-21
  9. Ilmén M, Thrane C, Penttilä M. 1996. The glucose repressor gene cre1 of Trichoderma: isolation and expression of a fulllength and a truncated mutant form. Mol. Gen. Genet. 251: 451-460.
  10. Jonkers W, Rep M. 2009. Mutation of CRE1 in Fusarium oxysporum reverts the pathogenicity defects of the FRP1 deletion mutant. Mol. Microbiol. 74: 1100-1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06922.x
  11. Kulmburg P, Mathieu M, Dowzer C, Kelly J, Felenbok B. 1993. Specific binding sites in the alcR and alcA promoters of the ethanol regulon for the CREA repressor mediating carbon catabolite repression in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 7: 847-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01175.x
  12. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV. 2008. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 35: 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0327-8
  13. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  14. Li AN, Xie C, Zhang J, Zhang J, Li DC. 2011. Cloning, expression, and characterization of serine protease from thermophilic fungus Thermoascus aurantiacus var. levisporus. J. Microbiol. 49: 121-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-011-9355-6
  15. Li DC, Li AN, Papageorgiou AC. 2011. Cellulases from thermophilic fungi: recent insights and biotechnological potential. Enzyme Res. DOI: 10.4061/2011/308730.
  16. Li JK, Feng M, Zhang L, Zhang ZH, Pan YH. 2008. Proteomics analysis of major royal jelly protein changes under different storage conditions. J. Proteome Res. 7: 3339-3353. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr8002276
  17. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods 25: 402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  18. Mach-Aigner AR, Pucher ME, Steiger MG, Bauer GE, Preis SJ, Mach RL. 2008. Transcriptional regulation of xyr1, encoding the main regulator of the xylanolytic and cellulolytic enzyme system in Hypocrea jecorina. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 6554-6562. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01143-08
  19. Maheshwari R, Bharadwaj G, Bhat MK. 2000. Thermophilic fungi: their physiology and enzymes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 3: 461-488. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.64.3.461-488.2000
  20. Nakari-Setala T, Paloheimo M, Kallio J, Vehmaanperä J, Penttilä M, Saloheimo M. 2009. Genetic modification of carbon catabolite repression in Trichoderma reesei for improved protein production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 4853-4860. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00282-09
  21. Penttilä M, Nevalainen H, Rättö M, Salminen E, Knowles J. 1987. A versatile transformation system for the cellulolytic filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Gene 61: 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(87)90110-7
  22. Portnoy T, Margeot A, Linke R, Atanasova L, Fekete E, Sándor E, et al. 2011. The CRE1 carbon catabolite repressor of the fungus Trichoderma reesei: a master regulator of carbon assimilation. BMC Genomics 12: 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-269
  23. Rauscher R, Würleitner E, Wacenovsky C, Aro N, Stricker AR, Zeilinger S, et al. 2008. Secretome analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain C IRM-BRFM41 grown on softwood. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80: 719-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1596-x
  24. Ries L, Belshaw NJ, Ilmén M, Penttilä ME, Alapuranen M, Archer DB. 2014. The role of CRE1 in nucleosome positioning within the cbh1 promoter and coding regions of Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98: 749-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5354-3
  25. Santangelo GM. 2006. Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70: 253-282. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.70.1.253-282.2006
  26. Soni SK, Soni R. 2010. Regulation of cellulase synthesis in Chaetomium erraticum. BioResources 5: 81-98.
  27. Strauss J, Mach RL, Zeilinger S, Hartler G, Stöffler G, Wolschek M, Kubicek CP. 1995. Crel, the carbon catabolite repressor protein from Trichoderma reesei. FEBS Lett. 376: 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(95)01255-5
  28. Strauss J, Horvath HK, Abdallah BM, Kindermann J, Mach RL, Kubicek CP. 1999. The function of CreA, the carbon catabolite repressor of Aspergillus nidulans, is regulated at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level. Mol. Microbiol. 32: 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01341.x
  29. Sun J, Glass NL. 2011. Identification of the CRE-1 cellulolytic regulon in Neurospora crassa. PLoS One 6: e25654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025654
  30. Voutilainen SP, Puranen T, Siika-Aho M, Lappalainen A, Alapuranen M, Kallio J, et al. 2008. Cloning, expression, and characterization of novel thermostable family 7 cellobiohydrolases. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101: 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21940
  31. Wang S, Liu G, Yu J, Tian S, Huang B, Xing M. 2013. RNA interference with carbon catabolite repression in Trichoderma koningii for enhancing cellulase production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 53: 104-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.04.007
  32. Wang SW, Xing M, Liu G, Yu SW, Wang J, Tian SL. 2012. Improving cellulase production in Trichoderma koningii through RNA interference on ace1 gene expression. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 22: 1133-1140. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1112.12037

Cited by

  1. Production of Cellulases by Rhizopus stolonifer from Glucose-Containing Media Based on the Regulation of Transcriptional Regulator CRE vol.27, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1608.08048
  2. Development of a genome-editing CRISPR/Cas9 system in thermophilic fungal Myceliophthora species and its application to hyper-cellulase production strain engineering vol.10, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0693-9
  3. Modulating Transcriptional Regulation of Plant Biomass Degrading Enzyme Networks for Rational Design of Industrial Fungal Strains vol.6, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00133
  4. Thermophilic xylanases: from bench to bottle vol.38, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2018.1425662
  5. Metabolic engineering of the thermophilic filamentous fungus Myceliophthora thermophila to produce fumaric acid vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1319-1
  6. Bioelectrochemical Detoxification of Phenolic Compounds during Enzymatic Pre-Treatment of Rice Straw vol.29, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1909.09042
  7. Dissecting cellobiose metabolic pathway and its application in biorefinery through consolidated bioprocessing in Myceliophthora thermophila vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40694-019-0083-8
  8. Direct production of commodity chemicals from lignocellulose using Myceliophthora thermophila vol.61, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2019.05.007
  9. Addressing challenges in production of cellulases for biomass hydrolysis: Targeted interventions into the genetics of cellulase producing fungi vol.329, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124746
  10. Coordination of consolidated bioprocessing technology and carbon dioxide fixation to produce malic acid directly from plant biomass in Myceliophthora thermophila vol.14, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02042-5