Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology

  • 제11권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1664-1673
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1975-0102(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7423(eISSN)
대한전기학회 (The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis of SOC Estimation using EECM and NST in Rechargeable LiCoO2/LiFePO4/LiNiMnCoO2 Cells

  • Lee, Hyun-jun (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Soongsil University) ;
  • Park, Joung-hu (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Soongsil University) ;
  • Kim, Jonghoon (Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.11.12
  • 심사 : 2016.06.20
  • 발행 : 2016.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Lithium rechargeable cells are used in many industrial applications, because they have high energy density and high power density. For an effective use of these lithium cells, it is essential to build a reliable battery management system (BMS). Therefore, the state of charge (SOC) estimation is one of the most important techniques used in the BMS. An appropriate modeling of the battery characteristics and an accurate algorithm to correct the modeling errors in accordance with the simplified model are required for practical SOC estimation. In order to implement these issues, this approach presents the comparative analysis of the SOC estimation performance using equivalent electrical circuit modeling (EECM) and noise suppression technique (NST) in three representative $LiCoO_2/LiFePO_4/LiNiMnCoO_2$ cells extensively applied in electric vehicles (EVs), hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) and energy storage system (ESS) applications. Depending on the difference between some EECMs according to the number of RC-ladders and NST, the SOC estimation performances based on the extended Kalman filter (EKF) algorithm are compared. Additionally, in order to increase the accuracy of the EECM of the $LiFePO_4$ cell, a minor loop trajectory for proper OCV parameterization is applied to the SOC estimation for the comparison of the performances among the compared to SOC estimation performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee H, Park J, Kim J. SOC estimation performance comparison based on the equivalent circuit model using an EKF in commercial $LiCoO_2$and $LiFePO_4$ cells. EVS 28.
  2. Katrasnik T. Analytical method to evaluate fuel consumption of hybrid electric vehicles at balanced energy content of the electric storage devices. Appl Energy 2010; 79: 51-64.
  3. Wang L, Cheng Y, Zou J. Battery available power prediction of hybrid electric vehicle based on improved Dynamic Matrix Control algorithms. J Power Sources 2014; 261: 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.091
  4. Waag W, Fleischer C, Sauer DU. Critical review of the methods for monitoring of lithium-ion batteries in electric and hybrid vehicles. J Power Sources 2014; 258: 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.064
  5. Miliani EH. Leakage current and commutation losses reduction in electric drives for Hybrid Electric Vehicle. J Power Sources 2014; 255:266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.009
  6. Chen Z, Mi CC, Xiong R, Xu J, You C. Energy management of a power-split plug-in hybrid electric vehicle based on genetic algorithm and quadratic programming. J Power Sources 2014; 248:416-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.085
  7. Torres JL, Gonzalez R, Gimenez A, Lopez J. Energy management strategy for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. A comparative study. Appl Energy 2013; 114:816-824.
  8. Wu X, Cao B, Li X, Xu J, Ren X. Component sizing optimization of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Appl Energy 2011; 88:799-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.08.018
  9. Han J, Park Y, Kim D. Optimal adaptation of equivalent factor of equivalent consumption minimization strategy for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles under active state inequality constraints. J Power Sources 2014; 267:491-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.067
  10. Xu L, Li J, Ouyang M, Hua J, Yang G. Multi-mode control strategy for fuel cell electric vehicles regarding fuel economy and durability. Int J Hydrog Energy 2014; 39:2374-2389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.11.133
  11. Xu L, Ouyang M, Li J, Yang F, Lu L, Hua J. Optimal sizing of plug-in fuel cell electric vehicles using models of vehicle performance and system cost. Appl Energy 2013; 103:477-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.010
  12. Xue L, Jiuchun J, Caiping Z, LeYi W, Linfeng Z. Robustness of SOC Estimation Algorithms for EV Lithium-Ion Batteries against Modeling Errors and Measurement Noise. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2015; 90:71-94.
  13. Zhang C, Jiang J, Zhang W, Sharkh S. Estimation of state of charge of lithium-ion batteries used in HEV using robust extended Kalman filtering. Energies 2012, 5:1098-1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/en5041098
  14. Chen Z, Fu Y, Mi C. State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries in electric drive vehicles using extended Kalman filtering. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 2013 62:1020-1030. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2012.2235474
  15. Xiong R, He H, Sun F, Zhao K. Evaluation on state of charge estimation of batteries with adaptive extended kalman filter by experiment approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Techology 2013; 62:108-117 https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2012.2222684
  16. Plett G. Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: Part 3. State andparameter estimation. Journal of Power Sources 2004; 134:277-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.033
  17. Plett G. Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs: part 2. Modeling and identification. Journal of Power Sources 2004; 134:262-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.032
  18. Plett G. Extended Kalman filtering for battery management systems of LiPB-based HEV battery packs. Part 1. Background. Journal of Power Sources 2004; 134:252-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.02.031
  19. Nam O, Lee J, Lee J, Kim J, Cho B. Li-ion battery SOC estimation method based on the reduced order extended Kalman filtering. 4th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit; I-9.
  20. Kim J, Seo G, Chun C, Cho B, Lee S. OCV hysteresis effect-based SOC estimation in extended Kalman filter algorithm for a $LiFePO_4$/C cell. IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference; 1-5.
  21. Zhang H, Chow M. On-line PHEV Battery Hysteresis Effect Dynamics Modeling. IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2010; 1844-1849.
  22. Lee H, Park J, Kim J. Comparison of SOC estimation using EKF of the $LiFePO_4$ cell according to minor loop in individual SOC range. The Koerean Institute of Power Electronics Annual Conference 2015; 397-398.
  23. Lee H, Park J, Kim J. Comparative evaluation of $LiFePO_4$ cell SOC estimation performance with ECM structure and noise model/data rejection in the EKF for transportation application. IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition 2016.