DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study of Medicinal and Acupuncture Treatment -Based on Terms of the Efficacy and the Method of Treatment-

한약 치료와 침구 치료에 대한 비교 연구 - 효능(혈성)·치법 용어를 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Sanghyun (Mibyeong Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Yongtaek (College of Korean Medicine, Woosuk University) ;
  • Kim, An-na (Mibyeong Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sangkyun (Mibyeong Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Jinsun (Mibyeong Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Hyunchul (Mibyeong Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine)
  • 김상현 (한국한의학연구원 미병연구단) ;
  • 오용택 (우석대학교 한의과대학) ;
  • 김안나 (한국한의학연구원 미병연구단) ;
  • 김상균 (한국한의학연구원 미병연구단) ;
  • 서진순 (한국한의학연구원 미병연구단) ;
  • 장현철 (한국한의학연구원 미병연구단)
  • Received : 2016.06.01
  • Accepted : 2016.09.29
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Objectives: Through this study, it would be expected to compare the characteristics of medicinal and acupuncture treatment. Method: Ontology DB of traditional Korean medicine has been used comparing medicinal and acupuncture treatment. Terms of the efficacy and the method of treatment were divided to predicate and object. And two groups were compared through contrasting the frequency of occurrence of significant words. Results: Predicates utilized more in medicinal treatment are the character ryeom[斂], go[固], pa[破], nae[內], and tu [透]. Predicates utilized more in acupuncture treatment are the character so[疏], jo[調], and seo[舒]. Object utilized more in acupuncture treatment is the character gi[氣]. Object utilized more in medicinal treatment is the character jeong[精]. Conclusions: In terms about the efficacy of acupuncture, there are many expressions associated with Qi[氣]. But expressions associated with Jing[精] are rare compare to medicinal treatment. There is a difference in language that represents the efficacy between medicinal and acupuncture treatment. In addition, there are some terms about efficacy that are not shared with each other due to the differences in disease treatment and the different branches of the two theories.

Keywords

References

  1. Professors of formula study of Korean Medicine School. Formula Study. Seoul:Yeong-lim Press. 2008:32.
  2. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History(.translated by Park HK, Yoon JH, Kim KW). Seoul:Beobin Publishers. 2005:853.
  3. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History(translated by Park HK, Yoon JH, Kim KW). Seoul:Beobin Publishers. 2005:519.
  4. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History(translated by Park HK, Yoon JH, Kim KW). Seoul:Beobin Publishers. 2005:884-900.
  5. Li YF, Zhuang LX. On the differences of the natures of acupoints and chinese herbal medicines. World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion. 2007;7(1):41.
  6. Ling ZY. Study on the theory of acupoint functions. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2005;25(2):131-2.
  7. Jang HC, Kim JH, Kim SK, Kim C, Bae SH, Kim AN, et al. Ontology for medicinal materials based on traditional Korean medicine. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(18):2359-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq424
  8. Kim SK, Jang HC, Kim JH, Yea SJ, Kim C, Eum DM, et al. A Study on Reasoning based on Herb and Formula Ontologies. J Korean Medical Classics. 2009;22(3):97-105.
  9. Kim AN, Oh YT, Kim SK, Seo JS, Jang HC. Disassembling Indication Terms of Medicinal Treatment Using a Cooperation Tool. Korean J Oriental Physiology & Pathology. 2013;27(4):362-6.
  10. Oh YT, Lee BW, Kim EH. A Study of the virtue terms in herbal medicine. J Korean Medical Classics. 2010;23(5):35-50.
  11. Oh YT, Jeon BU, Jang HC, Kim CS, Kim JH, Kim SK, et al. Study of connections between efficacy terms and remedy terms by conversion the raw terms into the representative terms. J Korean Medical Classics. 2011;24(5):99-105.
  12. Hong WS. Jeonggyohwangjenaegyeong-yeongchu. Seoul:Institute of Oriental Medicine. 1985:51.
  13. Heo Jun. New parallel translation texts of Donguibogam(annotated by Jin JP). Seoul: Beobin Publishers. 2012:2061.
  14. Li YF, Zhuang LX. On the differences of the natures of acupoints and chinese herbal medicines. World J Acu-Moxi. 2007;7(1):41.
  15. Ling ZY. Study on the theory of acupoint functions. Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion. 2005;25(2):131-2.
  16. Zeng XF. Change of status of the efficacy in herbal medicine by time period. Hubei J TCM. 2008;30(5):28.
  17. Yong XJ, Jiang YG, Chen Y, Han PY. Discuss the historical evolution of the expression for prescription efficiency and it's modern research meaning. Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research. 2005;16(4):293-4.
  18. Li YF, Zhuang LX. On the differences of the natures of acupoints and chinese herbal medicines. World J Acu-Moxi. 2007;7(1):41.
  19. Huang LX. Outline of Chinese Acupuncture Academic History(translated by Park HK, Yoon JH, Kim KW). Seoul:Beobin Publishers. 2005: 931-8.

Cited by

  1. 몽골과 한국 전통의학의 비교 연구 vol.31, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.18325/jkmr.2021.31.4.87