DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome

  • Cho, Sung-Ik (Department of Neurosurgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chough, Chung-Kee (Department of Neurosurgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Shu-Chung (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chun, Jin-Young (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.09.29
  • Accepted : 2016.10.07
  • Published : 2016.11.01

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study was to present the outcome of the microsurgical foraminotomy via Wiltse paraspinal approach for foraminal or extraforaminal (FEF) stenosis at L5-S1 level. We investigated risk factors associated with poor outcome of microsurgical foraminotomy at L5-S1 level. Methods : We analyzed 21 patients who underwent the microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5-S1 level. To investigate risk factors associated with poor outcome, patients were classified into two groups (success and failure in foraminotomy). Clinical outcomes were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of back and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including existence of spondylolisthesis, existence and degree of coronal wedging, disc height, foramen height, segmental lordotic angle (SLA) on neutral and dynamic view, segmental range of motion, and global lumbar lordotic angle were investigated. Results : Postoperative VAS score and ODI improved after foraminotomy. However, there were 7 patients (33%) who had persistent or recurrent leg pain. SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films were significantly associated with the failure in foraminotomy (p<0.05). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis revealed the optimal cut-off values of SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films for predicting failure in foraminotomy were $17.3^{\circ}$ and $24^{\circ}s$, respectively. Conclusion : Microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5-S1 level can provide good clinical outcomes in selected patients. Poor outcomes were associated with large SLA on preoperative neutral (>$17.3^{\circ}$) and extension radiographic films (>$24^{\circ}$).

Keywords

References

  1. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Okumura Y, Imura S : Microsurgical nerve root canal widening without fusion for lumbosacral intervertebral foraminal stenosis : technical notes and early results. Spinal Cord 34 : 644-650, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.116
  2. Bae JS, Kang KH, Park JH, Lim JH, Jang IT : Postoperative clinical outcome and risk factors for poor outcome of foraminal and extraforaminal lumbar disc herniation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 59 : 143-148, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.2.143
  3. Chang SB, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Kim JM : Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 1163-1167, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000216431.69359.91
  4. Darden BV 2nd, Wade JF, Alexander R, Wood KE, Rhyne AL 3rd, Hicks JR : Far lateral disc herniations treated by microscopic fragment excision. Techniques and results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 1500-1505, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199507000-00011
  5. Donaldson WF 3rd, Star MJ, Thorne RP : Surgical treatment for the far lateral herniated lumbar disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18 : 1263-1267, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199308000-00003
  6. Epstein NE : Foraminal and far lateral lumbar disc herniations : surgical alternatives and outcome measures. Spinal Cord 40 : 491-500, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101319
  7. Gioia G, Mandelli D, Capaccioni B, Randelli F, Tessari L : Surgical treatment of far lateral lumbar disc herniation. Identification of compressed root and discectomy by lateral approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 : 1952-1957, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199909150-00015
  8. Hallett A, Huntley JS, Gibson JN : Foraminal stenosis and single-level degenerative disc disease : a randomized controlled trial comparing decompression with decompression and instrumented fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 1375-1380, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318064520f
  9. Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, Covington LA : The surgical treatment of far lateral L3-L4 and L4-L5 disc herniations. A modified technique and outcomes analysis of 25 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 : 1243-1246, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199906150-00012
  10. Inufusa A, An HS, Lim TH, Hasegawa T, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH : Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 2412-2420, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199611010-00002
  11. Jenis LG, An HS : Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 389-394, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022
  12. Jenis LG, An HS, Gordin R : Foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine : a review of 65 surgical cases. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 30 : 205-211, 2001
  13. Kim HJ, Jeong JH, Cho HG, Chang BS, Lee CK, Yeom JS : Comparative observational study of surgical outcomes of lumbar foraminal stenosis using minimally invasive microsurgical extraforaminal decompression alone versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion : a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 24 : 388-395, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3592-4
  14. Kunogi J, Hasue M : Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 : 1312-1320, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012
  15. Lee S, Kang JH, Srikantha U, Jang IT, Oh SH : Extraforaminal compression of the L-5 nerve root at the lumbosacral junction : clinical analysis, decompression technique, and outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 20 : 371-379, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.12.SPINE12629
  16. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Ishii K, Tsuji T, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, et al. : Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction. J Neurosurg Spine 12 : 72-81, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.7.SPINE09344
  17. Ozeki N, Aota Y, Uesugi M, Kaneko K, Mihara H, Niimura T, et al. : Clinical results of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 21 : 324-327, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318149e681
  18. Papavero L, Kothe R : Microsurgical extraforaminal decompression of lumbar root canal stenosis. Oper Orthop Traumatol 25 : 16-30, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-012-0194-3
  19. Porter RW, Hibbert C, Evans C : The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9 : 418-421, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198405000-00017
  20. Spivak JM, Kummer FJ, Chen D, Quirno M, Kamerlink JR : Intervertebral foramen size and volume changes in low grade, low dysplasia isthmic spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 : 1829-1835, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ccc59d
  21. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW : New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 696-706, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198813060-00019
  22. Yamada K, Matsuda H, Nabeta M, Habunaga H, Suzuki A, Nakamura H : Clinical outcomes of microscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis : a comparison between patients with and without degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20 : 947-953, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1597-1

Cited by

  1. Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery Using a 30° Arthroscope for L5–S1 Foraminal Decompression vol.10, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.4.508
  2. Large Retroperitoneal Hematoma and Lumbosacral Plexopathy Following Microsurgical Decompression via the Wiltse Paraspinal Approach: A Case Report vol.3, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2018.00339
  3. Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty for Symptomatic Cement Leakage with Exiting Nerve Root Impingement vol.132, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.007
  4. Does “Coronal Root Angle” Serve as a Parameter in the Removal of Ventral Factors for Foraminal Stenosis at L5-S1 In Stand-alone Microendoscopic Decompression? vol.45, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003653
  5. Current Status of Biportal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Endoscopic Partial Facetectomy and Outcome Factors vol.6, pp.suppl1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2021.00073