KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Assessment of Suspension Bridge Construction and Engineering Technology

현수교 건설 기술수준 비교평가

  • 박태순 (국립한밭대학교 건설환경공학과 일반대학원) ;
  • 박희성 (국립한밭대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.19
  • Accepted : 2015.11.10
  • Published : 2016.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is to provide information for quantitative evaluation of suspension bridge engineering and construction technology, technology development, and long-span bridge R&D agenda. Technology classification structure and key words are established and survey to identify technology level is performed. Then, competitiveness of patents and journal articles is evaluated for Korea, USA, Japan, Germany, France, and England. As a result, USA and Japan are generally competitive countries for all technology categories based on patents and journal articles. Korea is grouped in upper-middle class for overall technology level of suspension bridge. However, there are some variances among the level of technologies. This research results could be utilized as reference to establish future long-span bridge R&D. Also, it can be a standardized methodology to compare technology levels among countries.

본 연구는 현수교 분야 기술수준의 정량적인 평가와 기술개발, 국토교통 R&D의 전략적 방향 모색 및 기술정책 수립 등 수요에 대응할 수 있는 기초자료 제공을 목적으로 수행하였다. 이를 위해 현수교 분야의 기술 분류체계를 구축하고 기술별 핵심 키워드를 도출하여 한국, 미국, 일본, 독일, 영국의 기술수준 조사를 실시하였다. 기술수준 평가결과 미국과 일본이 모든 기술분야에서 상위의 특허 및 논문기술경쟁력을 보유한 것으로 나타났다. 한국의 경우 전반적으로 중위권의 기술경쟁력을 보유한 것으로 나타났으나, 기술별 편차가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 향후 현수교 분야 기술개발 및 계획수립 시 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다. 그리고 기술 경쟁국간의 기술 수준 비교 방법론의 표준화를 위한 연구에 활용 될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Go, D. S., Choi, M. J., Jeong, G. H., Son, S. H. and Gwak, C. G. (2003). "A study on technology foresight and technology level for national S&T planning." Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (in Korean).
  2. Gordon, T. J. and Munson, T. (1981). "A proposed convention for measuring the state of the art of products of process." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 20, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(81)90038-X
  3. Jeong, G. H., Kim, I. H., Han, S. G., Gil, B. J., Park, H. G. and Park, S. D. (2001). "A study on the measurement of functional capability of emerging and strategic technologies." Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (in Korean).
  4. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) (2004). Forecast of the Development of Construction Technology of Construction Technology Indicators for International Competitiveness and Technology Report (in Korean).
  5. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) (1999). Development of Construction Technology Indicators and Technical Competitive Strength In : A for Establishing Policies for the Public Construction Projects (in Korean).
  6. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KICT) (2013). National Contribution of Construction Industry and Technology Level of Main Infrastructure in Korea. KICT 2013 (in Korean).
  7. Martino, J. (1993). Technology Forecasting for Decision Making, 3rd(ed), McGraw Hill, New York.
  8. OECD (1992). Technology and the Economy : The Key Relationships, OECD, Paris.
  9. OECD (1996). Special Issues on Government Foresight Exercises, STI Review No. 17, Paris.
  10. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press.
  11. Solow, R. (1957). "Technical change and the aggregate production ruction." Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 312-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047