KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph by Cluster Analysis Using Geomorphic Characteristics of Mid-size Watershed

지형학적 인자에 따라 군집화된 중소규모유역의 합성단위도법 제시

  • 김진겸 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 김종민 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 강부식 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2015.07.17
  • Accepted : 2016.04.28
  • Published : 2016.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The methodology of synthetic unit hydrograph using geomorphic characteristics was suggested. Six geomorphic components over 19 watersheds were used to estimate synthetic unit hydrograph and the test watersheds were classified into two groups on the basis of the area of $200km^2$. The regression formulas between standardized geomorphic characteristics for each group and peak quantities of specific streamflow and time of representative unit hydrograph were suggested and the Nash and the Clark unit hydrographs were derived. For verifying the derived unit hydrographs, the resulting hydrographs were compared with the ones using the existing Clark unit hydrographs based on the empirical parameter estimation for the 145 storm events during 2010 to 2011 for the additional six watersheds. The results showed the relatively higher performance over the existing synthetic unit hydrograph methods, which could be a contribution to the hydrologic estimation in ungauged watersheds.

유역의 지형학적특성을 이용한 합성단위도법을 제시하였다. 합성단위도 산정을 위하여 19개 유역에 대하여 6개 지형학적 인자를 사용하였으며, 전체유역을 유역면적 $ 200km^2$을 기준으로 2개의 군집으로 분류하였다. 19개 유역을 대상으로 군집별로 표준화된 지형학적 인자와 유역별 대표단위도의 첨두비유량 및 첨두시간과의 회귀식을 제시하였으며, Nash와 Clark 단위도를 유도하였다. 합성단위도의 모의정확도 검증을 위해 추가적으로 선택한 6개 유역에서 2010-2011년에 발생한 145개 강우-유출사상에 적용하여 경험식을 사용한 Clark모형의 적용결과와 비교하였다. 검증결과 기존의 합성단위도법에 비해 높은 정확도를 나타내었으며, 이러한 결과는 미계측 유역에서의 적용 가능성을 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bhunya, P. K., Berndtsson, R., Ojha, C. S. P. and Mishra, S. K. (2007). "Suitability of gamma, chi-square, weibull, and beta distribution as synthetic unit hydrographs." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 334, No. 1-2, pp. 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.022
  2. Bhunya, P. K., Mishra, S. K. and Berndtisson, R. (2003). "Simplified two-parameter gamma distribution for derivation of synthetic unit hydrograph." Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 226-230. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:4(226)
  3. Black, P. E. (1972). "Hydrograph responses to geomorphic model watershed characteristics and precipitation variables." Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 17, pp. 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(72)90090-X
  4. Clark, C. O. (1945). "Storage and the unit hydrograph." Trans. ASCE, Vol. 110, pp. 196-223.
  5. Ham, D. G., Joo, J. G., Jeon, H. D. and Kim, J. H. (2008). "Study on derivation of fourth-order GIUH and revision of initial state probability." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 231-241 (in Korean).
  6. Joo, J. G., Yang, J. M. and Kim, J. H. (2011). "GIUH variation by estimating locations." Journal of Korea Society of Hazard Mitigation, KOSHAM, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 85-91 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2011.11.1.085
  7. Kim, J. G., Kim, J. M. and Kang, B. S. (2013). "Estimation of synthetic unit hydrograph using geospatial shape factors and nash model in mid-size watershed." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, KWRA, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 547-558 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.5.547
  8. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and building Technology (KICT) (2000). Operation and Research on the Hydrological Characteristics of the Selma-Cheon Experimental Catchment-Development of Synthetic Unit Hydrograph (in Korean).
  9. Kumar, R., Chatterjee, C., Singh, R. D., Lohani, A. K. and Kumar, S. (2007). "Runoff estimation for an ungauged catchment using geomorphological instantaneous unit hydrograph (GIUH) models." Hydrological processes, Vol. 21, pp. 1829-1840. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6318
  10. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTMA) (2009). River design criteria (in Korean).
  11. Nash, J. E. (1957). "The form of the instantaneous unit hydrograph." IASH General Assembly of Toronto, Vol. 45, pp. 114-121.
  12. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Devoto, G. and Valdes, J. B. (1979a). "Discharge response analysis and hydrologic similarity: The interrelation between the geomorphologic IUH and the storm characteristics." Water Resources Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1435-1444. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR015i006p01435
  13. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Gonzalez-Sanabria, M. and Bras, R. I. (1982). "A geomorphoclimatic theory of instantaneous unit hydrograph." Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, pp. 877-886. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i004p00877
  14. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. and Valdes, J. B. (1979b). "The Geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response." Water Resources Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1409-1420. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR015i006p01409
  15. Rosso, R. (1984). "Nash model relation to horton order ratios." Water Resources Research, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 914-920. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR020i007p00914
  16. Sherman, L. K. (1932). "Streamflow from rainfall by unit hydrograph method." Engineering News Records, Vol. 108, pp. 501-505.
  17. Viessman, W. and Lewis G. L. (2003). Introduction to hydrology 5th edition, Prentice Hall, New jersey, N.J.
  18. Yoon, T. H., Kim, S. T. and Kim, I. D. (2004). "Redefining of parameters of nakayasu synthetic unit hydrograph." Journal of Korea Society of Civil Engineers, KSCE, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 403-412 (in Korean).