생태와환경 (Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment)

  • 제49권4호
  • /
  • Pages.385-392
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2288-1115(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1123(eISSN)
한국수생태학회 (The Korean Society of Limnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

관박쥐 (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum)의 지역개체군 간 반향정위 (Echolocation)의 차이

Echolocation Call Differences among Local Populations of Greater Horseshoe Bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum)

  • 장둘리 (경희대학교 대학원) ;
  • 김선숙 (국립생태원 생태연구본부 생태기반연구실) ;
  • 유정칠 (경희대학교 대학원)
  • Jang, Dooly (Department of Biology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Sook (Division of Basic Research, Bureau of Ecological Research, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Yoo, Jeong-Chil (Department of Biology, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.28
  • 심사 : 2016.12.28
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

지리적 격리는 생태학적 특징의 차이를 유발한다. 지리적인 격리는 박쥐 종 내의 소리 차이의 원인으로 알려져 왔다. 본 연구는 관박쥐의 반향정위가 지리적 차이에 의해 차이가 있는지를 알기 위해 우리나라 섬(제주도)과 내륙에서 수행되었다 우리는 내륙과 섬(제주도)에서 관박쥐가 활동기간에 휴식처로 이용하는 것으로 알려진 폐광과 동굴을 연구 지역으로 선정하였다. 관박쥐의 Hand-held call과 Free-flying call을 녹음하였다. 녹음된 펄스(pulse)는 관박쥐의 Hand-held call과 Free-flying call을 녹음하였다. 분석 결과, 내륙에서 서식하는 관박쥐의 PF는 평균 69 kHz로 섬(제주도)에 서식하는 관박쥐의 PF (71 kHz)와 차이가 났다. 판별 분석 결과에서도 내륙과 섬의 반향정위는 차이를 보였다. 우리나라 관박쥐 개체군의 PF는 유럽(82 kHz)보다는 낮고, 일본(65 kHz)보다는 높았다.

Geographical isolation may lead to the populations having different ecological characteristics. Geographic isolation have been known to cause echolocation call differences in bats. In order to look at geographic differences of echolocation calls of Great Horseshoe Bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum), populations of inland and Jeju island habitats were examined in Korea. The study areas were some abandoned mines in the inland and caves of Jeju island, which were known as rest sites of Great Horseshoe Bats during the active season. Recording was done in two ways: Hand-held, Free-flying. Recording pulse was analyzed into five parameters: Maximum Frequency (FMAX), Minimum Frequency (FMIN), Peak Frequency (PF), Duration (D), Inter pulse Interval (IPI). Interestingly, The present study shows that the difference in echolocation between the inland and island populations. The PF of bats inhabited inland was 69 kHz. but, the PF of bats inhabited island (Jeju) was 71 kHz. There was a difference between regions. Discriminant analyses also showed clear difference between the inland and the island populations. Especially, PF of Korea population is lower than that of Europe (82 kHz) and higher than that of Japan (65 kHz).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andrews, M.M. and P.T. Andrews. 2003. Ultrasound social calls made by greater horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in a nursery roost. Acta Chiropterologica 5(2): 221-234. https://doi.org/10.3161/001.005.0212
  2. Armstrong, K.N. and R.B. Coles. 2007. Echolocation call frequency differences between geographic isolates of Rhinonicteris aurantia (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae): implications of nasal chamber size. Journal of Mammalogy 88(1): 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-A-115R1.1
  3. Aspetsberger, F., D. Brandsen and D. Jacobs. 2003. Geographic variation in the morphology, echolocation and diet of the little free-tailed bat, Chaerephonpumilus (Molossidae). African Zoology 38(2): 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2003.11407278
  4. Barclay, R.M. 1999. Bats are not birds - a cautionary note on using echolocation calls to identify bats: a comment. Journal of Mammalogy 80(1): 290-296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383229
  5. Barclay, R.M., J.H. Fullard and D.S. Jacobs. 1999. Variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus): influence of body size, habitat structure, and geographic location. Canadian Journal of Zoology 77(4): 530-534. https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-008
  6. Brigham, R.M. and J.E. Cebek. 1989. Intraspecific variation in the echolocation calls of two species of insectivorous bats. Journal of Mammalogy 70(2): 426-428. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381534
  7. Bruns, V. 1976. Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Journal of Comparative Physiology 106(1): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00606573
  8. Chung, C.-U., S.-H. Han, C.-W. Lim, S.-C. Kim, H.-J. Lee, Y.-H. Kwon, C.-Y. Kim and C.-I. Lee. 2010. General Patterns in Echolocation Call of Greater Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Japanese Pipistrelle Bat Pipistrellus abramus and Large-Footed Bat Myotis macrodactylus in Korea. Journal of Environmental Science International 19(1): 61-68. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2010.19.1.061
  9. Fenton, M.B. and J.H. Fullard.1979. The influence of moth hearing on bat echolocation strategies. Journal of Comparative Physiology 132(1): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00617734
  10. Fukui, D., N. Agetsuma and D.A. Hill. 2004. Acoustic identification of eight species of bat (Mammalia: Chiroptera) inhabiting forests of southern Hokkaido, Japan: potential for conservation monitoring. Zoological Science 21(9): 947-955. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.21.947
  11. Fukui, D., D.A. Hill, K. Sun-Sook and S.-H. Han. 2015. Echolocation Call Structure of Fourteen Bat Species in Korea. Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity 31(3): 160. https://doi.org/10.5635/ASED.2015.31.3.160
  12. Fukui, D., T. Ishii, N. Agetsuma and T. Aoi. 2001. Efficiency of harp trap for capturing bats in boreal broad-leaved forest in Japan. Eurasian Journal of Forest Research-Hokkaido University (Japan). 3: 23-26.
  13. Gillam, E.H. and G.F. McCracken. 2007. Variability in the echolocation of Tadarida brasiliensis: effects of geography and local acoustic environment. Animal Behaviour 74(2): 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.12.006
  14. Griffin, D.R. 1958. Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New York.
  15. Griffin, D.R., F.A. Webster and C.R. Michael. 1960. The echolocation of flying insects by bats. Animal behaviour 8(3): 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(60)90022-1
  16. Grinnell, A. and H.-U. Schnitzler. 1977. Directional sensitivity of echolocation in the Horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 116(1): 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605517
  17. Guillen, A., J. Juste and C. Ibanez. 2000. Variation in the frequency of the echolocation calls of Hipposideros ruber in the Gulf of Guinea: an exploration of the adaptive meaning of the constant frequency value in rhinolophoid CF bats. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00155.x
  18. Heller, K.-G. and O.v. Helversen. 1989. Resource partitioning of sonar frequency bands in rhinolophoid bats. Oecologia 80(2): 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380148
  19. Huihua, Z., Z. Shuyi, Z. Mingxue and Z. Jiang. 2003. Correlations between call frequency and ear length in bats belonging to the families Rhinolophidae and Hipposideridae. Journal of Zoology 259(2): 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836902003199
  20. Jang, Y., E.H. Hahm, H.-J. Lee, S. Park, Y.-J. Won and J.C. Choe. 2011. Geographic variation in advertisement calls in a tree frog species: gene flow and selection hypotheses. PLoS One 6(8): e23297. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023297
  21. Jones, G., D.S. Jacobs, T.H. Kunz, M.R. Willig and P.A. Racey. 2009. Carpe noctem: the importance of bats as bioindicators. Endangered Species Research 8(1-2): 93-115. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00182
  22. Jones, G., K. Sripathi, D. Waters and G. Marimuthu. 1994. Individual variation in the echolocation calls of 3 sympatric INDIAN Hipposiderid bats, and an experimental attempt to jam bat echolocation. Folia Zoologica 43(4): 347-361.
  23. Jones, G. and E.C. Teeling. 2006. The evolution of echolocation in bats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(3): 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.001
  24. Jones, G. and M.W. Holderied. 2007. Bat echolocation calls: adaptation and convergent evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274(1612): 905-912. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0200
  25. Kim, S.-S., Y.-S. Choi and J.-C. Yoo. 2009. Winter Activity Greate Horseshoe Bats Rhinlophus ferrumequinum. Korean Journal of Enviroment and Ecology 19(1): 47-50.
  26. Kim, S.-S., Y.-S. Choi and J.-C. Yoo. 2014. The Thermal Preference and the Selection of Hibernacula in Seven Cave-dwelling Bats. Korean Journal of Enviroment and Ecology 47(4): 258-272. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2014.47.4.258
  27. Kingston, T., M.C. Lara, G. Jones, Z. Akbar, T.H. Kunz and C.J. Schneider. 2001. Acoustic divergence in two cryptic Hipposideros species: a role for social selection?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 268(1474): 1381-1386. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1630
  28. Law, B.S., L. Reinhold and M. Pennay. 2002. Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of Vespadelus spp. (Vespertilionidae) from New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Acta Chiropterologica 4(2): 201-215. https://doi.org/10.3161/001.004.0208
  29. Ma, J., K. Kobayasi, S. Zhang and W. Metzner. 2006. Vocal communication in adult greater horseshoe bats, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 192(5): 535-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0094-9
  30. Mohres, F.P. 1953. Über die Ultraschallorientierung der Hufeisennasen (Chiroptera-Rhinolophinae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology 34(6): 547-588.
  31. Murray, K.L., E.R. Britzke and L.W. Robbins. 2001. Variation in search-phase calls of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 82(3): 728-737. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0728:VISPCO>2.0.CO;2
  32. Neuweiler, G. 1989. Foraging ecology and audition in echolocating bats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4(6): 160-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90120-1
  33. O'farrell, M.J., C. Corben and W. L. Gannon. 2000. Geographic variation in the echolocation calls of the hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus). Acta Chiropterologica 2(2): 185-196.
  34. Obrist, M.K. 1995. Flexible bat echolocation: the influence of individual, habitat and conspecifics on sonar signal design. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 36(3): 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00177798
  35. Parsons, S. and G. Jones. 2000. Acoustic identification of twelve species of echolocating bat by discriminant function analysis and artificial neural networks. Journal of Experimental Biology 203(17): 2641-2656.
  36. Puechmaille, S.J., M.A. Gouilh, P. Piyapan, M. Yokubol, K.M. Mie, P.J. Bates, C. Satasook, T. Nwe, S.S. H. Bu and I.J. Mackie. 2011. The evolution of sensory divergence in the context of limited gene flow in the bumblebee bat. Nature Communications 2: 573. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1582
  37. Pye, D. 1980. Adaptiveness of echolocation signals in bats. Trends Neuro Sci 3:232-235.
  38. Russo, D. and G. Jones. 2002. Identification of twenty-two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy by analysis of time-expanded recordings of echolocation calls. Journal of Zoology 258(01): 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836902001231
  39. Russo, D., M. Mucedda, M. Bello, S. Biscardi, E. Pidinchedda and G. Jones. 2007. Divergent echolocation call frequencies in insular rhinolophids (Chiroptera): a case of character displacement? Journal of Biogeography 34(12): 2129-2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01762.x
  40. Schnitzler, H.-U. and A. Grinnell. 1977. Directional sensitivity of echolocation in the horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Journal of Comparative Physiology 116(1): 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00605516
  41. Schnitzler, H.-U., C.F. Moss and A. Denzinger. 2003. From spatial orientation to food acquisition in echolocating bats. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18(8): 386-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00185-X
  42. Schnitzler, H., E. Kalko and A. Denzinger. 2004. Evolution of echolocation and foraging behavior in bats. Echolocation in bats and dolphins: 331-339.
  43. Schnitzler, H. and E.K. Kalko. 1998. How echolocating bats search and find food. Bat biology and conservation (Kunz, T.H. and P.A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC: 183-196.
  44. Stebbings, R.E. and F. Griffith. 1986. Distribution and status of bats in Europe, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, UK.
  45. Taniguchi, I. 1985. Echolocation sounds and hearing of the greater Japanese horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon). Journal of Comparative Physiology A 156(2): 185-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00610860
  46. Team, R.C. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2012, ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
  47. Thomas, D.W., G.P. Bell and M.B. Fenton. 1987. Variation in echolocation call frequencies recorded from North American vespertilionid bats: a cautionary note. Journal of Mammalogy 68(4): 842-847. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381562
  48. Thomas, J.A. 2004. Echolocation in bats and dolphins, University of Chicago Press.