DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implicit Treatment of Technical Specification and Thermal Hydraulic Parameter Uncertainties in Gaussian Process Model to Estimate Safety Margin

  • Fynan, Douglas A. (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Ahn, Kwang-Il (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Received : 2015.09.14
  • Accepted : 2016.01.13
  • Published : 2016.06.25

Abstract

The Gaussian process model (GPM) is a flexible surrogate model that can be used for nonparametric regression for multivariate problems. A unique feature of the GPM is that a prediction variance is automatically provided with the regression function. In this paper, we estimate the safety margin of a nuclear power plant by performing regression on the output of best-estimate simulations of a large-break loss-of-coolant accident with sampling of safety system configuration, sequence timing, technical specifications, and thermal hydraulic parameter uncertainties. The key aspect of our approach is that the GPM regression is only performed on the dominant input variables, the safety injection flow rate and the delay time for AC powered pumps to start representing sequence timing uncertainty, providing a predictive model for the peak clad temperature during a reflood phase. Other uncertainties are interpreted as contributors to the measurement noise of the code output and are implicitly treated in the GPM in the noise variance term, providing local uncertainty bounds for the peak clad temperature. We discuss the applicability of the foregoing method to reduce the use of conservative assumptions in best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) and Level 1 probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) success criteria definitions while dealing with a large number of uncertainties.

Keywords

References

  1. C.E. Rasmussen, K.I. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2006.
  2. C.E. Rasmussen, H. Nickisch, Gaussian process for machine learning (GPML) toolbox, J. Machine Learning Res. 11 (2010) 3011.
  3. J.P. Yurko, Uncertainty quantification in safety codes using a Bayesian approach with data from separate and integral effect tests, PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2014.
  4. R.M. Neal, Bayesian learning for neural networks, No. 118, in: Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, New York, 1996.
  5. W.S. Cleveland, Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74 (1979) 929.
  6. KOPEC, Probabilistic safety assessment for Ulchin Units 3&4, Korea Power Engineering Company, Yongin (Korea), 2004.
  7. D.H. Lee, H.G. Lim, H.Y. Yoon, J.J. Jeong, Improvement of the LOCA PSA model using a best-estimate thermal-hydraulic analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 46 (2014) 541. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.02.2014.003
  8. KAERI, Code structure, system models, and solution methods, KAERI/TR-2812/2004, in: MARS Code Manual, Volume I, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon (Korea), 2009.
  9. J.J. Jeong, K.D. Kim, S.W. Lee, Y.J. Lee, B.D. Chung, M. Hwang, Development of the MARS input model for Ulchin 3/4 transient analyzer, KAERI/TR-2620/2003, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon (Korea), 2003.
  10. KEPCO, Ulchin Units 3&4 final safety analysis report, Final Safety Analysis Report, Korea Electric Power Corporation, Naju (Korea), 1996.
  11. D.A. Fynan, K.I. Ahn, J.C. Lee, PCT uncertainty analysis using unscented transform with random orthogonal matrix, Trans. Korean Nucl. Soc., Spring Meeting, Jeju (Korea), (2015).
  12. H.G. Lim, S.H. Han, J.J. Jeong, MOSAIQUEdA network based software for probabilistic uncertainty analysis of computerized simulation models, Nucl. Eng. Design 21 (2011) 1776.
  13. K.R. Hoopingarner, F.R. Zaloudek, Aging mitigation and improved programs for nuclear service diesel generators, NUREG/CR-5057, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington D.C. (WA), 1989.

Cited by

  1. Thermal-hydraulic hot-spot analysis of IRT-5000 nuclear research reactor: Comparative safety evaluation vol.47, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5937/fmet1901212t
  2. Emergency core cooling system performance criteria for Multi-Layered Silicon Carbide nuclear fuel cladding vol.353, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110280