DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of No Stiffness Inside Unbonded Tendon Ducts on the Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Containment Vessels

  • Received : 2015.09.17
  • Accepted : 2016.01.16
  • Published : 2016.06.25

Abstract

The numerical simulation methodologies to evaluate the structural behaviors of prestressed concrete containment vessels (PCCVs) have been substantially developed in recent decades. However, there remain several issues to be investigated more closely to narrow the gap between test results and numerical simulations. As one of those issues, the effects of no stiffness inside unbonded tendon ducts on the behavior of PCCVs are investigated in this study. Duct holes for prestressing cables' passing are provided inside the containment wall and dome in one to three directions for general PCCVs. The specific stress distribution along the periphery of the prestressing duct hole and the loss of stiffness inside the hole, especially in an unbonded tendon system, are usually neglected in the analysis of PCCVs with the assumption that the duct hole is filled with concrete. However, duct holes are not small enough to be neglected. In this study, the effects of no stiffness inside the unbonded tendon system on the behaviors of PCCVs are evaluated using both analytical and numerical approaches. From the results, the effects of no stiffness in unbonded tendons need to be considered in numerical simulations for PCCVs, especially under internal pressure loading.

Keywords

References

  1. R.Y. Jung, H.I. Cho, S.M. Ahn, The Structural Integrity Test for the Shin-kori Unit 3 Containment and Acceptance Criteria, Transactions, SMiRT-22 Division VI, 2013.
  2. M.F. Hessheimer, E.W. Klamerus, L.D. Lambert, G.S. Rightley, Overpressurization Test of a 1:4-Scale Prestressed Concrete Containment Vessel Model, NUREG/CR-6810, SAND2003-0840P, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (CA), 2003.
  3. R.A. Dameron, B.E. Hansen, D.R. Parker, Y.R. Rashid, Post-test Analysis of the NUPEC/NRC 1:4 Scale Prestressed Concrete Containment Vessel Model, NUREG/CR-6809, SAND2003-0839P, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore (CA), 2003.
  4. S.H. Noh, R.Y. Jung, S.T. Kim, S.J. Lim, The Structural Integrity Test for a PSC Containment with Unbonded Tendons and Numerical Analysis I, vol. 28, No. 5, Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 2015, pp. 523-533. https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2015.28.5.523
  5. S.H. Noh, R.Y. Jung, B.S. Lee, S.J. Lim, The Structural Integrity Test for a PSC Containment with Unbonded Tendons and Numerical Analysis II, vol. 28, No. 5, Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 2015, pp. 535-542. https://doi.org/10.7734/COSEIK.2015.28.5.535
  6. S.P. Timoshenko, J.N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1970.
  7. S. Smith, On Fundamental Aspects of Concrete Behavior, MSc Thesis, University of Colorado, Boulder (CO), 1987.
  8. P.H. Menetrey, K.J. Willam, Triaxial failure criterion for concrete and its generation, ACI Struct. J. 92 (1995) 311-318.
  9. W.F. Chen, Constitutive Equations for Engineering Materials, Elsevier, Philadelphia (PA), 1994.
  10. H. Okamura, K. Maekawa, Nonlinear Analysis and Constitutive Models of Reinforced Concrete, Kibodang, 1990.
  11. T.T.C. Hsu, Unified Theory of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press, 1993, pp. 205-218.