Management & Information Systems Review (경영과정보연구)

Daehan Academy of Management Information Systems (대한경영정보학회)
권호 표지

The Conceptual Study of Knowledge Adoption based on Resource and Institutionalization Theory for Organizational Knowledge Creation Applied to Knowledge Management Systems

지식 원천 이론과 제도적 이론 관점에서 조직의 지식 수용과 창출에 관한 개념적 연구

  • Received : 2016.05.13
  • Accepted : 2016.06.15
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study are as follows : First, This study conceptually provide an insight of reasons that organizations seek to create, acquire, store and distribute knowledge at the level of an organization and of process how they can transform or evolve to knowledge based organizations. Second, this study confirms examine what theories can be used to knowledge management, how such theories can be useful to analyse knowledge management and provide a theoretical foundation for knowledge management research. Applied to the theories of knowledge based and resource based view and institutional theory, the essence of knowledge management confirms that the organization finds job-related knowledge and know-how retained by individual of organizational members systematically and shares common knowledge within the organization and explains knowledge creation, multi-dimensional knowledge transition and share in all dimension of individual, group, and organization. As a result of comparative analysis of theory of organizational knowledge creation theory, In knowledge management, building of knowledge-creative culture, transitional process of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, knowledge creation and knowledge operation are important. In the basis on these study results, we discussed how the organizational knowledge creation theory can be used to manage knowledge in the organization, and also proposed hypotheses based on some arguments against the universal acceptance of the theory.

본 연구는 지식원천 이론과 제도적 이론관점에서 조직의 지식 수용과정과 창출활동을 분석 설명하고자 하였다. 연구목적으로는 첫째, 지식경영과 지식경영활동에 적용되어지고 있는 다수의 이론들의 본질을 선행연구를 중심으로 살펴하고, 둘째, 지식경영에 적용된 이론들의 차이점과 공통점을 분석하여, 효과적인 지식경영을 위한 제언을 제공하는 것이다. 연구결과, 지식경영활동의 자원과 제도를 중심으로 본 지식 수용이론과 조직의 지식창조활동과 관련된 이론들을 중심으로 지식경영 활동의 본질을 확인한 결과, 지식수용 활동은 구성원 개인들이 보유하고 있는 업무관련 지식이나 노하우를 체계적으로 발굴하여 조직 내부의 보편적 차원의 지식으로 공유하고 적극 활용하여 조직 전체의 경쟁력 향상 도모가, 지식창출 활동은 조직 내 개인, 집단, 조직 등 모든 차원에서 지식 창출을 위한 학습, 다차원적 지식이전과 공유를 위한 창조적 문화 활성화과정의 중요성을 이론으로 살펴보았다. 또한, 지식 창출 이론의 비교 분석의 결과, 우리는 보편적으로 받아들여지고 있는 조직의 지식 창출이론에 대하여 몇몇 인자에 기초하여 조직의 지식을 관리하는 데 제안 할 수 있는 가설과 방법을 논의 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, Kwan-Young, Park, Roh-Gook, (2016), "The effect of small and medium enterprises CEO's leadership on knowledge management", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Ventuing and Enterpreneurship, Vol. 11(1), 29-38.
  2. Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E., (2001), "Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues", MIS Quarterly, 25, 107-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961
  3. Barney, J., (1991), "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage", Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 99.
  4. Chang-Jung Kim, (2012), "Comparative study for knowledge and learning organization", Korean Business Review, Vol. 5(2), 53-71,
  5. Cho Young-Hyun and Lee Kyung_Geun, (2007), "The effects of Chemyoon(social face) sensitivity and weness on knowledge management activities", Journal of Korean Industrial Economic Association, Vol. 20(4), 1689-1715.
  6. Chuang, S., (2004), "A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation", Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 27, 459-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.05.008
  7. Clwmes, B.W. and Douglast, T.J., (2005), "Understanding strategic response to institutional pressures", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, 1205-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.04.002
  8. Conner, K.R. and Prahalad, C.K., (1996), "A Resource-based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism", Organization Science, Vol. 7, 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.477
  9. Dimimaggio, P.J. and Powel, W.W.,(1983), "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, Vol, 48, 147-160.
  10. Garavelli, C., Gorgoglione, M. and Scozzi, B., (2004), "Knowledge management strategy and organization: a perspective of analysis", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 11, 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.209
  11. Glisby Martin and Holden Nigel, (2003), "Contextual Constraints in Knowledge Management Theory: The Cultural Embeddedness of Nonaka's Knowledge-creating Company", Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 10,(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.158
  12. Grant, R.M., (1996), "Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, 109-122.
  13. Greenaway, K.E. and Chan, Y.E., (2005), "Theoretical Explanations for Firms' Information Privacy Behaviors", Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 6, 171-189. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00068
  14. Hur, M. S. and Chon, M. J., (2007), "Knowledge Management Systems", Hankyung Press.
  15. Kamoche, K. and Harvey, M. (2006), "Knowledge diffusion in the African context: An institutional theory perspective", Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 48, 157-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20091
  16. Kang Min Su, Arum Park, Kyoung Jun Lee, (2015), "Case study on the enterprise microblog usage: focusing on knowledge management strategy", Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol. 21(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2015.21.1.47
  17. Ki ho-ik and Park Young-kyu(2012), "Analysis on the effects of organizational characteristics on knowledge management activities and knowledge management performance", The e-business studies, Vol. 13(5), 77-98.
  18. Marrati, Paola, (2006), "Time, Life, Concepts: The Newness of Bergson", Project MUSE, MLN 120 (2005): 1099-1111.
  19. Nonaka Ikujiro, (1994), "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Organization Science, Vol. 5,(1), 1994.
  20. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi. H., (1995), "Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Knowledge-Creating Company, 56-94.
  21. Nonaka, I. and Konno, N., (1998), "The Concept of 'Ba': Building A Foundation For Knowledge Creation", California Management Review, Vol. 40(3).
  22. Nonaka, I. , Vonkrogh, G. and Voelpel. S., (2006), "Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Pathsand Future Advances", Organization Studies, Vol. 27, 1179-1208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606066312
  23. Nystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H., (1984), "Organizational Facades", Academy of Management Proceedings, 182-185.
  24. Oliver, C., (1991), "Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, 145. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
  25. Orlikowski, W.J. and Barley, S.R., (2001), "Technology and Institutions: what can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from each Other?", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250927
  26. Sang Yun, Gyowan Choo, (2014), "An empirical study of the impact of the technology innovation capabilities and patent-related activities from the knowledge management and new product development on the business performance", Journal of Korean Industrial Economic Association, Vol. 27(4), 1653-1683.
  27. Schmid, H., (2004), "Organization-Environment Relationships: Theory for Management Practice in Human Service Organizations", Administration in Social Work, Vol. 28, 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v28n01_07
  28. Styhre, Alexander, (2004), "Rethinking Knowledge: A Bergsonian Critique of the Notion of Tacit Knowledge", British Journal of Management, Vol. 15, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00413.x
  29. Suzanne Guerlac, (2005), "Thinking in time: Henri Bergson (an interdisciplinary conference)", Project MUSE, MLN 120 (2005): 1091-1098.
  30. Yoo Hyo-Sook, Choi Hyuk-Ra, Kim Seon-Myung, (2013), "Factors influencing the performance of knowledge management systems: Focused on individual characteristics and task-technology fit", Journal of Korean Contents Association, Vol. 13(1), 376-389.