Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Structural Model Analysis of the Effects of Creativity, Motivation, Family System on Gifted Preschool Children

유아 영재성에 영향을 미치는 창의성, 동기, 가족체계 간의 구조모형 분석

  • Received : 2016.04.29
  • Accepted : 2016.06.27
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the structural relationships between gifted preschool children and their related variables(creativity, motivation, family system). 230 preschool children, parents and teachers from U-city have participated in this study. the collected data were analyzed with SPSS and AMOS. The goodness of fit was evaluated using the SRMR, RMSEA, CFI, and TLI. The results of this study were as follows: First, family system(adaptability, cohesion) were found to have a statistically significant direct impact on gifted preschool children. Second, creativity were found to have a significant direct effects on gifted preschool children. moreover they also had an indirect effect on gifted preschool children through family system. Third, motivation were found to have a statistically significant direct impact on gifted preschool children.

본 연구는 유아 영재성에 영향을 미치는 인지적 요인(창의성) 비인지적 요인(동기), 가정환경적 요인(가족체계) 간의 관계를 살펴보는데 목적이 있다. 연구대상은 U시에 소재한 유아교육기관 8곳에서 재원 중인 만 5세 유아 230명의 부모와 담임교사들이 참여하였으며 수집 된 자료는 신뢰도(Cronbach's ${\alpha}$) 계수 및 상관계수를 구하고 연구모형의 적합도를 살펴보기 위해 구조모형분석(SEM)을 실시하였다. 결과를 살펴보면 유아 영재성에 영향을 미치는 창의성, 동기, 가족체계 간의 구조모형의 적합도 지수들은 RMSEA=.016(.000~.066), SRMR=.044, TLI=.996, CFI=.999로 모두 권장 적합도 수준을 충족시키는 것으로 나타났다. 다음으로 창의성, 가족체계가 유아 영재성에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 가족 체계는 유아 영재성에 간접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 가족체계는 창의성에 직접적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김빛내 (2011). 유아 영재 어머니의 양육 경험에 대한 내러티브 탐구. 석사학위논문. 부경대학교.
  2. 김 호 (2008). 유아의 내-외적 동기 및 어머니와 교사의 창의성이 유아의 창의성에 미치는 영향. 열린유아교육연구, 13(4), 283-298.
  3. 문수백 (2009). 구조방정식 모델링의 이해와 적용. 서울: 학지사.
  4. 박성인, 조석희, 김홍원, 이지현, 윤여홍, 진석언, 한기순(2003). 영재교육학원론. 서울: 교육과학사.
  5. 배혜선 (2003). 유아의 영재성과 창의성의 관계 분석. 석사학위논문. 성균관대학교.
  6. 영재교육진흥법 (2000). 제정 2000, 1, 28, 법률 제6215호.
  7. 오미형 (2005). 유아의 창의성에 영향을 미치는 창의적 가정환경과 정의적 인지적 특성간의 인과관계. 박사학위논문. 경북대학교.
  8. 이순복, 전귀연 (2006). 부모 및 가족 특성이 영재유아와 일반유아의 창의성에 미치는 영향. 유아교육연구, 26(4), 283-310.
  9. 이옥형, 이현주 (2001). 영재의 정의적 특성에 관한 이론적 고찰. 교육연구, 35, 27-56.
  10. 이채호 (2010). 유아영재관련 연구동향 분석. 아동교육, 19(3), 175-184.
  11. 이채호 (2012). 유아영재 측정모형 타당화 및 관련변인들과의 관계연구. 박사학위논문. 성균관대학교.
  12. 이채호 (2015). 유아의 동기와 가족기능이 유아 창의성에 미치는 영향. 창의력교육연구, 15(1), 83-95.
  13. 이채호, 최인수 (2011). 부모-교사용 유아 간편 다중지능척도 타당화 연구. 영재교육연구, 21(2), 449-463.
  14. 이채호, 최인수 (2012). 교사용 유아 영재성 평가척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 영재교육연구, 22(2), 263-277.
  15. 임지향 (2000). 정신지체 가정의 가족기능과 어머니의 일상 스트레스 대처방식과의 관계. 박사학위논문. 대구대학교.
  16. 정민자 (2005). 유아의 창의성과 어머니의 양육신념. -창의적 특성변인간의 구조모형. 박사학위논문. 경희대학교.
  17. 정선미 (2011). 영재유아 어머니와 일반유아 어머니의 양육효능감, 양육스트레스, 가족기능성간의 관계. 석사학위논문. 부경대학교.
  18. 장영숙 (2007). 부모용 유아 영재성 평정 척도 개발. 미래유아교육학회, 14(2), 1-23.
  19. 정정희, 윤미승, 김호년 (2007). 언어영재와 일반유아의 이야기 구성능력과 언어적 창의성의 차이에 대한 연구. 아동교육, 16(2), 219-234
  20. 조현정, 장영숙 (2010). 유아의 동기 및 자아개념과 창의적 인성간의 관계. 아동교육, 19(3), 251-264.
  21. 최인수 (2011). 창의성의 발견. 서울: 쌤앤파커스.
  22. 최현주 (2009). 유아영재와 일반유아의 정의적 특성에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 숭실대학교.
  23. 홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19, 161-177.
  24. 황근순, 박병기 (2005). 지능과 창의성에 의한 영재유아와 일반유아의 비교. 아동교육, 14(2), 259-270.
  25. 황해익, 이혜은 (2003). 영재성 판별 모형 개발을 위한 영재성 개념 탐색. 유아교육논총, 11, 39-56.
  26. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag .
  27. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Colorado: Westview Press
  28. Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. N. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950
  29. Barbour, N. E. (1992). Early childhood gifted education: A collaborative perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329201500204
  30. Benbow, C. P., & Arimand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 430-441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.430
  31. Bisno, M. H. (1996). Memories of parental attitudes and child-rearing behaviors among the intellectually gifted and creative. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology-Berkeley, Almeda.
  32. Bloom, B. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. NY: Ballatine Books.
  33. Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analysis of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(3), 461-483. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0703_6
  34. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1982). Towards a psychology of optimal experience. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  35. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: a systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 325-339). Cambridge: MA: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
  37. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  38. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Dacey, J. S. (1999). Peak periods of creative growth a cross the lifespan. In Puccio, G. J., & Murdock, M. C. (Ed.). Creativity assesment: Reading and resources (pp. 323-345). Buffalo, NY:CEF Press.
  40. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5nd Eds.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  41. Erlich, V. (1978). The Astor Program for gifted children: Pre-kindergarten through grade three. New York: Teachers College Press.
  42. Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 112-127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Gagne, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302
  44. Gagne, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development through DMGT-based analysis. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.) International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
  45. Gardner, H. (1983). The frames of minds: The theory of multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
  46. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
  47. Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and Talent Evaluation Scales: A norm-referenced procedure for identifying gifted and talented students. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
  48. Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, M. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little, Brawn.
  49. Gogel, E. M., McCumsey, J., & Hewett, G. (1985). What parents are saying. G/C/T, 41, 7-9.
  50. Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(4), 179-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000402
  51. Gross, M. (1999). Small puppies: Highly gifted children in the early years. Roeper Review, 21(3), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553963
  52. Harrison, C. (2004). Giftedness in early childhood education: The search for complexity and connection. Roeper Review, 26(2), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554246
  53. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1987). Creativity and learning. Washington, DC: NEY Professional Library.
  54. Herskovits, M. (2000). Family influences on the development of high ability. Gifted Education International, 14(3), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940001400305
  55. Hodge, A. H., & Kemp, C. R. (2000). Exploring the nature of giftedness in preschool children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 24(1), 46-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320002400103
  56. Karen, J. A. (2001). Gifted: The lost minority. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 168-172.
  57. Karnes, M. (1983). The underserved: Our young gifted children. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
  58. Kaufmann, F. A., & Sexton, D. (1983). Some inplications for home-school linkages. Roeper Review, 6(1), 49-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198309552749
  59. Kingore, B. (2001). The Kingore Observation Inventory(KOI). 2nd Ed. Austin: Professional Associates Publishing.
  60. Kranz, B. (1981). Kranz talent identification instrument. Moorhead, MN: Moorhead State College.
  61. Landau, E., Weissler, K., & Golod, G.(1996). Motivation and Giftedness. Gifted Education International, 11(3), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142949601100306
  62. MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022403
  63. Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2008). Creativity. In S.I. Pfeiffer(Ed.) (pp.247-270). Handbook of Giftedness in Children Psycho-Educational Theory, Research, and Best Practices. New York: Kluwer Academic.
  64. McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (2009). The Gifted Evaluation Scale (3nd ed.): Technical manual. Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services, Inc.
  65. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
  66. Olson, D. H., & Killorin, E. (1992). Clinical rating scale for circumplex model. St. Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
  67. Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). The pole of the family in talent development. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 53-70). New York: Springer.
  68. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Petscher, Y. (2008). Identifying young gifted dhildren using the gifted rating scales-preschool/kindergarten form. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(2), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311055
  69. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kapan, 60(3), 180-184.
  70. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptualization of Giftedness (pp. 53-92). NY: Cambridge University Press.
  71. Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 246-279). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The school wide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  73. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The school wide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  74. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., & Hartman, R. K. (1976). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  75. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  76. Rimm, S. B. (2001). Key to parenting the gifted child. Hauppage, N.Y.: Barron's Educational Series.
  77. Roedell, W. C. (1985). Developing social competencies in gifted preschool children. Remdial and special Education, 6(4), 6-11.
  78. Runco, M. A. (1996). Creativity and development: Recommendations. In M. A. Runco(Ed.), Creativity from childhood through adulthood: The developmental issues. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  79. Runco, M. A. (2005). Creative giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 295-311). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  80. Ryser, G. R., & McConnell, K. (2004). Scales for Identifying Gifted Students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
  81. Silverman, L. K., & Golon, A. S. (2008). Clinical practice with gifted families. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (pp. 199-222). New York: Springer.
  82. Simpson, N. D. (1999). Relationships between the academic achievement and intelligence, creativity, motivation, and gender role identity of gifted children. unpublished doctoral dissertation. Univ. of Houston: Houston.
  83. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  84. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd Eds.). Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.
  85. Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius(vol. 1): Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  86. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). Genetic studies of genius(vol. 4): The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  87. Torrance, E. P. (1976). Guiding creative talent. New York: Robert E. Krieger.
  88. Torrance, E. P. (1981). Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement. Illionis: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
  89. Verna, M. A., & Spina, M. (2002). Parental processes and self-concepts effect the academic achievement of italian students. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of AERA. April 1-5, New Orleans, LA. Heider, 2000