상하수도학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater)

  • 제30권4호
  • /
  • Pages.427-440
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1225-7672(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-822X(eISSN)
대한상하수도학회 (The Korean Society of Water and Wastewater)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공공하수처리시설 공법 선정을 위한 계층화분석법 적용방안 고찰

A study on AHP application of selection method for the best treatment technology of public sewage treatment works

  • 투고 : 2016.06.21
  • 심사 : 2016.08.05
  • 발행 : 2016.08.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Various kinds of processes are used in the Public Sewage Treatment Works(PSTWs) in order to achieve water quality criteria and TMDL in the watershed. The performance of the existing processes at PSTWs depends on influent characteristics, effluent quality target, amount of sludge production, power cost and other factors. In present, the Selection Guideline for the Available Treatment Process of PSTWs is used for a process decision in the country. But there are some problems regarding redundancy of assessment factors and complexity of assessment procedure in the guideline. In this study, we did a test application of AHP for process selection of PSTWs, which propose is to simplify assessment factors such as pollutant removal amount, sludge generation, electricity consumption, stability of operation, convenience of maintenance, easiness of existing process application, installation cost, and operating cost concerning of environmental factors, technical factors and economical factors. According to the study, the PSTWs selection procedure guideline can be improved using application of AHP method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bottero, M., Comino, E., Riggio, V. (2011). Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems, Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 1211-1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.002
  2. Cho, G.T., Cho, Y.G., Kang, H.S. (2005). Analytic and hierarchical decision-making that readers go ahead, Seoul: Donghyund, pp. 1-62.
  3. EU (2010). The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau(EIPPCB) within the framework of the implementation of the EU legislation on Industrial Emissions (2010/75/EU).
  4. Ibanez-Fores, V., Bovea, M.D., Perez-Belis, V. (2014). A holistic review of applied methodologies for assessing and selecting the optimal technological alternative from a sustainability perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 259-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.082
  5. Korea Development Institute(KDI) (2001). A study on multicriteria analysis measures for primary feasibility investigation(II), pp. 101-196.
  6. Korea Development Institute (2004). A study on amendment and supplementation for general guideline of primary feasibility investigation implementation, pp. 343-376.
  7. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs(MOAFRA) (2007). A study on establishment measures of performance management strategy using AHP method.
  8. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2015a). Guideline to select treatment technology of public sewage treatment works, and the point to assess and write the technical proposals.
  9. Ministry of Environment (2015b). Investigation result for status of management above $500m^3/day$ public sewage treatment works in 2014 (excel sheet), http://www.me.go.kr/home/web/policy_data/read.do?pagerOffset=30&maxPageItems=10&maxIndexPages=10&searchKey=&searchValue=&menuId=10264&orgCd=&condition.code=A5&seq=6589 (November 3, 2015).
  10. Ministry of Environment (2015c). Working guideline of operation and management for public sewage treatment works and sewer system.
  11. Ministry of Strategy and Finance (MOSF) (2015). Implementation guideline of primary feasibility investigation in 2015.
  12. National Institute of Environmental Research(NIER) (2003) Comparison analysis of BAT assessment method, pp. 161-182.
  13. National Institute of Environmental Research (2014). Preparation of BAT assessment and selection guideline, and plan establishment for writing common BREF document, pp. 40-54.
  14. National Research Foundation of Korea(NRFK) (2007). A study on new selection process of research proposals using AHP, pp. 3-23.
  15. Shin Y.K., Kim C.G., Kim T.Y. (2005). Priority determination of environment-friendly agricultural policy program using AHP, Agricultural Economy, 28(2), 39-56.
  16. US EPA (2010) NPDES permit writer's manual, pp. 5.1-5.49.
  17. Yang G.G. (2013) Analysis of relative importance of FMD disaster management policies by their categories, Korean Administration Research, 22(2), 91-119.

피인용 문헌

  1. Grid-Based Flood Risk Mapping Considering Indices of Regional Characteristics vol.18, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.7.513
  2. 공공하수도 관리대행 성과평가 지표별 가중치분석을 통한 우선순위에 대한 연구 vol.34, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2020.34.6.495