The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear bond strength of indirect composite material to monolithic zirconia

  • Sari, Fatih (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep) ;
  • Secilmis, Asli (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep) ;
  • Simsek, Irfan (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Adiyaman) ;
  • Ozsevik, Semih (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep)
  • Received : 2016.02.03
  • Accepted : 2016.05.30
  • Published : 2016.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on bond strength of indirect composite material (Tescera Indirect Composite System) to monolithic zirconia (inCoris TZI). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Partially stabilized monolithic zirconia blocks were cut into with 2.0 mm thickness. Sintered zirconia specimens were divided into different surface treatment groups: no treatment (control), sandblasting, glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application, and sandblasting + glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application. The indirect composite material was applied to the surface of the monolithic zirconia specimens. Shear bond strength value of each specimen was evaluated after thermocycling. The fractured surface of each specimen was examined with a stereomicroscope and a scanning electron microscope to assess the failure types. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey LSD tests (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Bond strength was significantly lower in untreated specimens than in sandblasted specimens (P<.05). No difference between the glaze layer and hydrofluoric acid application treated groups were observed. However, bond strength for these groups were significantly higher as compared with the other two groups (P<.05). CONCLUSION. Combined use of glaze layer & hydrofluoric acid application and silanization are reliable for strong and durable bonding between indirect composite material and monolithic zirconia.

Keywords

References

  1. Oliveira-Ogliari A, Collares FM, Feitosa VP, Sauro S, Ogliari FA, Moraes RR. Methacrylate bonding to zirconia by in situ silica nanoparticle surface deposition. Dent Mater 2015;31:68-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.011
  2. Preis V, Letsch C, Handel G, Behr M, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Influence of substructure design, veneer application technique, and firing regime on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. Dent Mater 2013;29:e113-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.011
  3. Raigrodski AJ, Yu A, Chiche GJ, Hochstedler JL, Mancl LA, Mohamed SE. Clinical efficacy of veneered zirconium dioxide-based posterior partial fixed dental prostheses: five-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:214-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60165-6
  4. Worni A, Kolgeci L, Rentsch-Kollar A, Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R. Zirconia-based screw-retained prostheses supported by implants: a retrospective study on technical complications and failures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17:1073-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12214
  5. Tartaglia GM, Sidoti E, Sforza C. Seven-year prospective clinical study on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:1137-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1330-2
  6. Monaco C, Caldari M, Scotti R; AIOP (Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry) Clinical Research Group. Clinical evaluation of zirconia-based restorations on implants: a retrospective cohort study from the AIOP clinical research group. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:239-42.
  7. Sadid-Zadeh R, Liu PR, Aponte-Wesson R, O'Neal SJ. Maxillary cement retained implant supported monolithic zirconia prosthesis in a full mouth rehabilitation: a clinical report. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:209-17. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.209
  8. Moscovitch M. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35:315-23. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2270
  9. Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, Kanno T, Niwano Y, Milleding P, Ortengren U. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:602-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2015.1007479
  10. Venezia P, Torsello F, Cavalcanti R, D'Amato S. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:506-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.010
  11. Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modifications: clinical and technical aspects. Quintessence Int 2013;44:557-66.
  12. Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, Takanashi T, Furuya K, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Translucency and flexural strength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layered zirconia. Dent Mater J 2015;34:910-7. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-107
  13. Vichi A, Carrabba M, Paravina R, Ferrari M. Translucency of ceramic materials for CEREC CAD/CAM system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12105
  14. Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent 2015;43:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.011
  15. Ramos GF, Monteiro EB, Bottino MA, Zhang Y, Marques de Melo R. Failure probability of three designs of zirconia crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2015;35:843-9. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2448
  16. Lee SY, Vang MS, Yang HS, Park SW, Park HO, Lim HP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:68-74. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.68
  17. Kanat B, COmlekoglu EM, Dundar-COmlekoglu M, Hakan Sen B, Ozcan M, Ali GungOr M. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs. J Prosthodont 2014;23:445-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12130
  18. Kobayashi K, Komine F, Blatz MB, Saito A, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Influence of priming agents on the shortterm bond strength of an indirect composite veneering material to zirconium dioxide ceramic. Quintessence Int 2009;40:545-51.
  19. Komine F, Fushiki R, Koizuka M, Taguchi K, Kamio S, Matsumura H. Effect of surface treatment on bond strength between an indirect composite material and a zirconia framework. J Oral Sci 2012;54:39-46. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.54.39
  20. Fushiki R, Komine F, Blatz MB, Koizuka M, Taguchi K, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength between an indirect composite layering material and feldspathic porcelain-coated zirconia ceramics. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1401-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0641-9
  21. Koizuka M, Komine F, Blatz MB, Fushiki R, Taguchi K, Matsumura H. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a gingiva-colored indirect composite veneering material to three implant framework materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:977-84.
  22. Komine F, Taguchi K, Fushiki R, Kamio S, Iwasaki T, Matsumura H. In vitro comparison of fracture load of implant-supported, zirconia-based, porcelain- and compositelayered restorations after artificial aging. Dent Mater J 2014;33:607-13. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-356
  23. Su N, Yue L, Liao Y, Liu W, Zhang H, Li X, Wang H, Shen J. The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:214-23. Erratum in: J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:506. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.506
  24. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratoryprocessed resin composites. Dent Mater 2003;19:393-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00082-9
  25. Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent 2013;38:E1-11. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-436-L
  26. Ozakar-Ilday N, Zorba YO, Yildiz M, Erdem V, Seven N, Demirbuga S. Three-year clinical performance of two indirect composite inlays compared to direct composite restorations. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18:e521-8.
  27. Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khajotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:719-27. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-148
  28. Yi YA, Ahn JS, Park YJ, Jun SH, Lee IB, Cho BH, Son HH, Seo DG. The effect of sandblasting and different primers on shear bond strength between yttria-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal ceramic and a self-adhesive resin cement. Oper Dent. 2015;40:63-71. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-149-L
  29. Karakoca S, Yilmaz H. Influence of surface treatments on surface roughness, phase transformation, and biaxial flexural strength of Y-TZP ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:930-7.
  30. Gargari M, Gloria F, Napoli E, Pujia AM. Zirconia: cementation of prosthetic restorations. Literature review. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2010;3:25-9.
  31. Erdem A, Akar GC, Erdem A, Kose T. Effects of different surface treatments on bond strength between resin cements and zirconia ceramics. Oper Dent 2014;39:E118-27. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-420-L
  32. Cura C, Ozcan M, Isik G, Saracoglu A. Comparison of alternative adhesive cementation concepts for zirconia ceramic: glaze layer vs zirconia primer. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:75-82.
  33. Everson P, Addison O, Palin WM, Burke FJ. Improved bonding of zirconia substructures to resin using a "glaze-on" technique. J Dent 2012;40:347-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.011
  34. Bottino MA, Bergoli C, Lima EG, Marocho SM, Souza RO, Valandro LF. Bonding of Y-TZP to dentin: effects of Y-TZP surface conditioning, resin cement type, and aging. Oper Dent 2014;39:291-300. https://doi.org/10.2341/12-235-L
  35. Seabra B, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Influence of multimode universal adhesives and zirconia primer application techniques on zirconia repair. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:182-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.008
  36. Lung CY, Matinlinna JP. Aspects of silane coupling agents and surface conditioning in dentistry: an overview. Dent Mater 2012;28:467-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.009
  37. Lung CY, Liu D, Matinlinna JP. Silica coating of zirconia by silicon nitride hydrolysis on adhesion promotion of resin to zirconia. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015;46:103-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.10.029

Cited by

  1. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic and metal alloy vol.32, pp.20, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1470363
  2. Influence of different surface treatments on zirconia/resin shear bond strength using one-bottle universal adhesive pp.1743-6761, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2018.1507427
  3. Effect of airborne particle abrasion and sintering order on the surface roughness and shear bond strength between Y-TZP ceramic and resin cement vol.38, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-051
  4. OIC (open interproximal contact)의 다양한 해결 방법 vol.28, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15522/jkaed.2019.28.1.18
  5. Biomechanical evaluation between orthodontic attachment and three different materials after various surface treatments: A three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis vol.89, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2319/072918-547.1
  6. Comparison of the Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Zirconia and Composite Resin to Polyether Ether Ketone: An In Vitro Study vol.12, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_147_20
  7. Does Diamond Stone Grinding Change the Surface Characteristics and Flexural Strength of Monolithic Zirconia? vol.45, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2341/19-023-l
  8. Oxygen Plasma Improved Shear Strength of Bonding between Zirconia and Composite Resin vol.10, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10070635