The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

  • 제8권4호
  • /
  • Pages.304-312
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2005-7806(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-7814(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis

  • Song, Ho-Yong (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.12.23
  • 심사 : 2016.05.30
  • 발행 : 2016.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the stress distribution of 2-short implants (2SIs) installed in a severely atrophic maxillary molar site. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three different diameters of internal connection implants were modeled: narrow platform (NP), regular platform (RP), and wide platform (WP). The maxillary first molars were restored with one implant or two short implants. Three 2SI models (NP-oblique, NP-vertical, and NP-horizontal) and four single implant models (RP and WP in a centered or cantilevered position) were used. Axial and oblique loadings were applied on the occlusal surface of the crown. The von Mises stress values were measured at the bone-implant, peri-implant bone, and implant/abutment complex. RESULTS. The highest stress distribution at the bone-implant interface and the peri-implant bone was noticed in the RP group, and the lowest stress distribution was observed in the 2SI groups. Cantilevered position showed unfavorable stress distribution with axial loading. 2SI types did not affect the stress distribution in oblique loading. The number and installation positions of the implant, rather than the bone level, influenced the stress distribution of 2SIs. The implant/abutment complex of WP presented the highest stress concentration while that of 2SIs showed the lowest stress concentration. CONCLUSION. 2SIs may be useful for achieving stable stress distribution on the surrounding bone and implant-abutment complex in the atrophic posterior maxilla.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  2. Schwartz-Arad D, Laviv A, Levin L. Failure causes, timing, and cluster behavior: an 8-year study of dental implants. Implant Dent 2008;17:200-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181777906
  3. Kim SH, Kim SJ, Lee KW, Han DH. The effects of local factors on the survival of dental implants: A 19 year retrospective study. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2010;48:28-40. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2010.48.1.28
  4. Anderson DJ. Measurement of stress in mastication. I. J Dent Res 1956;35:664-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345560350050201
  5. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Craig's restorative dental material. 13th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby 2011. p. 60.
  6. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:11-45.
  7. Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Cho SC, Elian N, Monteiro D, Kim BS, Tarnow DP. Sinus augmentation utilizing anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) with absorbable and nonabsorbable membranes placed over the lateral window: histomorphometric and clinical analyses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:551-9.
  8. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, Fugazzotto PA. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-8.
  9. Akça K, Cehreli MC, Iplikçioglu H. A comparison of threedimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:115-21.
  10. Ryu HS, Kim SJ, Park EJ, Kim MR. A retrospective study of the cumulative survival rate and change of peri-implant marginal bone around implants associated with maxillary sinus augmentation. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2009;47:240-6. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2009.47.2.240
  11. Lazzara RJ. The sinus elevation procedure in endosseous implant therapy. Curr Opin Periodontol 1996;3:178-83.
  12. Winter AA, Pollack AS, Odrich RB. Placement of implants in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla using localized management of the sinus floor: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:687-95.
  13. Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U, Branemark PI. Longterm follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:184-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00116.x
  14. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:86-93.
  15. Tawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machinedsurface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:894-901.
  16. Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:487-96.
  17. Thor A, Sennerby L, Hirsch JM, Rasmusson L. Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.047
  18. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:151-61.
  19. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:254-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x
  20. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:126-31.
  21. Sato Y, Shindoi N, Hosokawa R, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y. Biomechanical effects of double or wide implants for single molar replacement in the posterior mandibular region. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:842-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00598.x
  22. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:139-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.010
  23. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Two-implant-supported single molar replacement: interdental space requirements and comparison to alternative options. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:426-35.
  24. Song HY, Heo YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Two-short implant supported single molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla : a clinical study. J Korean Dent Assoc 2015;53:628-43.
  25. Collings E. The physical metallurgy of titanium alloys. American Society for Metals. Ohio; Metals Park, 1984.
  26. Pessoa RS, Vaz LG, Marcantonio E Jr, Vander Sloten J, Duyck J, Jaecques SV. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:911-9.
  27. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
  28. Cağlar A, Aydin C, Ozen J, Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T. Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:36-44.
  29. Cha HS, Kim YS, Jeon JH, Lee JH. Cumulative survival rate and complication rates of single-tooth implant; focused on the coronal fracture of fixture in the internal connection implant. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:595-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12065

피인용 문헌

  1. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis vol.10, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.184