The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration (수산경영론집)

The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration (한국수산경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Operational Plan and Economical Validity in Aquacultural for Contingency Red Tide

적조 대응 육상양식장 운영방안 및 경제적 타당성 분석

  • Lee, Kwang-Nam (Korea Fisheries Association, Fisheries Policy Institute Samho Center)
  • 이광남 (한국수산회 수산정책연구소)
  • Received : 2016.09.04
  • Accepted : 2016.09.26
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper analyzed economic feasibility of aquacultural construction which of large-scale. The results of the economic analysis, cage cultural and water recycling cultural by post-water treatment were analyzed that NPV is 2,083,685 thousand won and -14,105,896 thousand won and B/C ratio is 0.590 and 0.855, respectively. These were shown economic infeasibility. But, running water culture by pre-water treatment(small scale) and running water culture by pre-water treatment(large scale) were analyzed that the one is 5,555,747 thousand won and 15,048,589 thousand won and the other is 1,154 and 1,1221, respectively. these were shown economic feasibility. In addition, measurement of B/C ratio through a sensitivity analysis on running water cultural by pre-water treatment(small scale) and running water cultural by pre-water treatment(large scale) is economic feasibility in all cases. However, these were analyzed when the selling price was falling to 20 percent, it has shown economic infeasibility and when the selling price rises to 20 percent, water recycling culture by post-water treatment has economic feasibility. The significance of the study analyzed a sensibility as well as economic feasibility by methods and scales. It is expected that used as basic materials when constructing and operating of land aquaculture in order to minimize the damage from natural disasters.

Keywords

References

  1. Eh. Y. Y. (2014), "Productivity of Aquaculture Facility Utilization," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 45 (2), 85-95.
  2. Eh. Y. Y.(2015), "Production planning in fish farm," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 46 (3), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2015.46.3.129
  3. Hwang, J. W., Lee, K. H. Jeong, D. S. and Kim, K. S. (2005), "A economic effects of fish seed release," The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 36 (1), 121-138.
  4. Kang, S. K. (2013), "Economic Analysis of Ecklonia cava Aquaculture Business," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 44 (2), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2013.44.2.069
  5. Kang, S. K. (2013), "The Estimation and Economic Evaluation of Fisheries Benefit in Jeju Trial Sea Farm Project," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 44 (3), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2013.44.3.029
  6. Kankainen, M., Setara, J., Berrill, I. K., Ruohonen, K. C. N. and Schneider, O. (2012), "How to measure the economic impacts of change in growth, feed efficiency and survival in aquaculture," Aquaculture Economic and Management, 16, 341-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2012.729247
  7. Kim, S. B. (2009), Public investment analysis.
  8. Lee, K. N. (2014), "Estimating the fisheries losses due to Chinese's illegal fishing in the Korean EEZ," The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration, 45 (2), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2014.45.2.073
  9. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (2015), "A study of Development of Land Aquacultural Technology for Contingency Red Tide," 102-121, 130-139.
  10. Park, C. H. (2012), "The Study on the Comparative Analysis of the Aquaculture Production Efficiency Regarding Methods and Species," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 43 (2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2012.43.2.079
  11. Song, J. H. (2010), "A Study on the Utilizing System of Aquaculture Farms in Japan," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 41 (1), 53-72.
  12. Son, M. H., Park, M. W. and Lim, H. K. (2014), "An Economic Analysis of Black Rockfish, Sebastes schlegeli in the Marine Floating Cage Culture," The Journal Fisheries Business Administration, 45 (1), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2014.45.1.095