The Journal of Fisheries Business Administration (수산경영론집)

The Korean Society of Fisheries Business Administration (한국수산경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study on the Ecosystem Service and Benefit Indicators of Natural Seaweed Beds

천연 해조장 생태계 서비스 및 편익지표에 관한 탐색적 연구

  • Kang, Seok-Kyu (Department of Business Administration, Jeju National University)
  • Received : 2016.09.10
  • Accepted : 2016.09.29
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the ecosystem service and benefit indicators of natural seaweed beds. Ecosystems of natural seaweed beds provide a wide range of services and benefits to human society including provisioning services, regulating services, supporting services, and cultural services. Indicators for each of the ecosystem services are chosen by marine plants ecologists and as follows. Ecosystem indicators of natural seaweed beds for provisioning services are well-being food(amount of seaweed harvested/amount of fish landed, fish biomass, area of natural seaweed beds, the number of species, contribution to the second production), raw materials(amount of biomass by breed, amount of aquaculture feed), genetic resources(amount of genetic material extracted, amount of genetic material contained by age and habitat), and medicinal resources(amount of medicinal material extracted). Ecosystem indicators of natural seaweed beds for regulating services are air purification(amount of fine dust/NOx or $SO_2$ captured), climate regulation(amount of $CO_2$ sequestered), waste treatment(amount of N, P stored, biochemical degradation capacity COD), and costal erosion prevention(length and change of natural coast line, amount of sediment prevented). Ecosystem indicators of natural seaweed beds for supporting services are lifecycle and maintenance(primary production, contribution to the second production) and gene pool protection(amount of compositional factors in ecosystem, introduced species). Ecosystem indicators of natural seaweed beds for cultural services are recreation and tourism(the number of visits of an area) and information for cognitive development(amount of time spent in education, research and individual learning about ecosystem of natural seaweed beds).

Keywords

References

  1. 강석규 외 (2015), "천연 해조장의 생태적 가치평가: 해외사례분석과 평가방법", 한국수산자원관리공단.
  2. Beaumont, N., Townsend, M., Mangi, S. and Austen, M. (2006), Marine Biodiversity of an Economic Valuation: Building the Evidence Base for the Marine Bill, UK Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, p. 73. http://www.earthmind.net/marine/docs/uk-marine-valuation.pdf (accessed 16.04.11.).
  3. Bell, F. W. (1986), "Economic policy issues associated with beach renourishment," Policy Stud. Rev, 6, 374-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1986.tb00704.x
  4. Bell, F. W. and Leeworthy, V. R. (1986), "An Economic Analysis for the Importance of Saltwater Beaches in Florida. Department of Economics," Florida State University, Tallahassee.
  5. Bell, F. W. (1997), "The economic valuation of saltwater marsh supporting marine recreational fishing in the southeastern United States," Ecological Economics, 21 (3), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00105-X
  6. Bohnke-Henrichs, A., de Groot, R., Baulcomb, C., Hussain, S., Koss, R. and Fofana, A. (2013), "Typology and Indicators of Ecosystem Services for Marine Spatial Planning and Management," Journal of Environment Management, 130, 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.027
  7. Cameron, T. and James, M. (1987), "Efficient estimation methods for "closed-ended"contingent valuation surveys," Rev. Econ. Stat, 69, 269-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927234
  8. Campagne, C. S., Salles, J. M., Boissery, P. and Deter, J. (2015), "The seagrass Posidonia oceanica: Ecosystem services identification and economic evaluation of goods and benefits," Marine Pollution Bullertin, 97, 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.05.061
  9. Cesar, H. (1996). Economic Analysis of Indonesian Coral Reefs. Available via. World Bank, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEEI/214574-1153316226850/20486385/EconomicAnalysisofIndonesian CoralReefs1996.pdf (accessed 03.09.12.).
  10. CICES (2013). CICES V4.3 (January 2013). CICES for ecosystem service mapping and assessment. .
  11. Costanza, R., d'Agre, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, s., O'neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P. and Belt, M. (1997), "The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital," Nature, 387, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
  12. Daly, H. E. and Farley, J. (2004), Ecological Economics, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  13. De Groot, R. S. (1992), "Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management, and Decision Making," Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, 315.
  14. De Groot, R. S, Wilson, M. and Boumans, M. J. (2002), "A Typology for the Classification, Description and Valuation of Ecosystem Functions, Goods and Services," Ecological Economics, 41, 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  15. Dehghani, M., Farshchi, P., Danekar, A., Karami, M. and Aleshikh, A. A. (2010), "Recreation value of Hara biosphere reserve using willingness-to-pay method," Int. J. Environ. Res. 4, 271-280.
  16. Ehrlich, P. R. and Ehrlich, A. H. (1981), Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. 1st edition. Random House, New York. xiv.
  17. Erwin, P. M., Lopez-Legentil, S. and Schuhmann, P. W. (2010), "The pharmaceutical value of marine biodiversity for anti-cancer drug discovery," Ecol. Econ. 70, 445-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.030
  18. Haines-Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2013), Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December. EEA Framework Contract No. EEA/IEA/09/003.
  19. Hattam, C., Atkins, J. P., Beaumont, N., Borger, T., Bohnke-Henrichs, A., Burdon, D., de Groot, R., Hoefnagel, E., Nunes, P., Piwowarczyk, J., Sastre, S. and Austen, M. C. (2015), "Marine ecosystem services: Linking indicators to their classification," Ecological Indicators, 49, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.026
  20. Hunsicker, M. E., Essington, T. E., Watson, R. and Sumaila, U. R. (2010), "The contribution of cephalopods to global marine fisheries: can we have our squid and eat them too?," Fish and Fisheries, 11, 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00369.x
  21. Gao, L. and Hailu, A. (2011), "Evaluating the effects of area closure for recreational fishing in a coral reef ecosystem: the benefits of an integrated economic and biophysical modeling," Ecol. Econ. 70, 1735-1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.014
  22. Jialin, L., Dianfa, Z., Xiaoping, Y. and Yiqing, T. (2009), "Effects of land use changes on values of ecosystem functions on coastal plain of south Hangzhou bay bank," China. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 4, 542-547.
  23. Kasperski, S. and Wieland, R. (2009), "When is it optimal to delay harvesting? the role ofecological services in the northern Chesapeake Bay oyster fishery," Resou. Econ. 24, 361-385. https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.24.4.42629662
  24. Lange, G. M. and Jiddawi, N. (2009), "Economic value of marine ecosystem services in Zanzibar: implications for marine conservation and sustainable development," Ocean Coast. Manage. 52, 521-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.08.005
  25. MEA (2005a), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
  26. MEA (2005b), Chapter 5-Biodiversity in Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being, Policy Responses, 3, Island Press.
  27. O'Higgins, T. G., Ferraro, S. P., Dantin, D. D., Jordan, S. J. and Chintala, M. M. (2010), "Habitat scale mapping of fisheries ecosystem service values in estuaries," Ecol. Soc. 15.
  28. Ruijgrok, E. C. M., Smale, A. J., Zijlstra, R., Abma, R., Berkers, R. F. A., Nemeth, A. A., Asselmann, N., de Kluiver, P. P., de Groot, R., Kircholtes, U., Todd, P. G., Buter, E., Hellegers, P. J. G. J. and Rosenberg, F. A. (2006). Kentallen waardering natuur, water, bodem en landschap; hulpmiddel bij MKBA's. Witteveen+Bos, Rotterdam, p. 263.
  29. Souza, F. E. S. and Ramos e Silva, C. A. (2011), "Ecological and economic valuation of the Potengi estuary mangrove wetlands (NE, Brazil) using ancillary spatial data," J. Coast. Conserv, 15, 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-010-0133-0
  30. Tapsuwan, S. and Asafu-Adjaye, J. (2008), "Estimating the economic benefit of SCUBA diving in the Similan Islands," Thailand. Coast. Manage, 36, 431-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920750802412908
  31. TEEB (2010), The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Ecological and Economic Foundations, edited by Pushpam Kumar.
  32. UNEP (2014), Guidance Manual on Valuation and Accounting of Ecosystem Services for Small Island Developing States, Ecosystem Services Economics Unit, Division of Environment Policy Implementation.
  33. UNEP-WCMC (2011), Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: Valuation Methods and Their Application, Biodiversity Series, 33, 1-46.
  34. Wang, X., Chen, W., Zhang, L., Jin, D. and Lu, C. (2010), "Estimating the ecosystem service losses from proposed land reclamation projects: a case study in Xiamen," Ecol. Econ, 69, 2549-2556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.031