Evaluation of narrow-diameter implant with trapezoid-shape design and microthreads in beagle dogs: A pilot study

성견에서 사다리꼴형 디자인과 미세나사선을 가진 단폭경임플란트의 골유착 평가: 예비연구

  • Chang, Yun-Young (Division of Periodontology, Department of Dentistry, Inha International Medical Center) ;
  • Yun, Jeong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University)
  • 장윤영 (인하국제의료센터 치주과) ;
  • 윤정호 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실, 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Received : 2016.05.18
  • Accepted : 2016.06.20
  • Published : 2016.07.01

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of narrow-diameter implant with trapezoid-shape and to evaluate the effect of coronal microthreads on trapezoid-shape narrow-diameter implant. Materials and Methods: The experimental narrow-diameter implants were classified into two groups according to absence or presence of coronal microthreads: trapezoid-shape narrow diameter implant (TN group) and trapezoid-shape narrow-diameter implant with microthreads (TNM group). They were installed alternately in bilateral mandible in three dogs. After 8 weeks, the animals were sacrificed. Resonance frequency analysis, removal torque test, and histometric analysis were performed. Results: Statistically higher implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were observed in TNM group than in TN group at the time of implant installation. However, significant ISQ values difference was not observed between groups at 8 weeks. Both groups showed significantly increased ISQ values at 8 weeks, compared to the time of implant installation. There was no significant difference between groups in removal torque test. Bone-implant contact ratio also showed no significant difference between groups in total and coronal part. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it could be concluded that the trapezoid-shape design on narrow-diameter implant showed successful ossointegration, and the microthreads on coronal part did not result in significant bone-implant contact and biomechanical stability at 8 weeks.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 산업통상자원부

References

  1. Zinsli B, Sagesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(1):92-99.
  2. Ding X, Liao SH, Zhu XH, et al. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11(4):279-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00124.x
  3. Kobayashi E, Matsumoto S, Doi H, et al. Mechanical properties of the binary titaniumzirconium alloys and their potential for biomedical materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29(8):943-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290805
  4. Thoma DS, Jones AA, Dard M, et al. Tissue integration of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a comparative histologic and radiographic study in the canine. J Periodontol 2011;82(10):1453-1461. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100737
  5. Anchieta RB, Baldassarri M, Guastaldi F, et al. Mechanical property assessment of bone healing around a titanium-zirconium alloy dental implant. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014;16(6):913-919. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12061
  6. Chang YY, Kim SH, Park KO, Yun JH. Evaluation of a reverse-tapered design on the osseointegration of narrow-diameter implants in beagle dogs: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:611-620.
  7. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23(4):313-323.
  8. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(2):129-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x
  9. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1(1):11-25.
  10. Kong L, Hu K, Li D, et al. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23(1):65-74.
  11. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10(5):394-405. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100506.x
  12. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8(3):107-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00016.x
  13. Hudieb MI, Wakabayashi N, Kasugai S. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant. J Periodontol 2011;82(7):1061-1070. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100237
  14. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, et al. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(5):789-794.
  15. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(8):827-832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01730.x
  16. Suh JY, Jeung OC, Choi BJ, Park JW. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(3):362-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01323.x
  17. Park JW, Park KB, Suh JY. Effects of calcium ion incorporation on bone healing of Ti6Al4V alloy implants in rabbit tibiae. Biomaterials 2007;28(22):3306-3313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.007
  18. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x
  19. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140101.x
  20. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11(5):391-401.
  21. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x
  22. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(3):251-262. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
  23. Festing M, Overend P, Gaines D, R, et al. The design of animal experiments: reducing the use of animals in research through better experimental design. 1 ed. London: Royal Society of Medicine, 2002.