A Theoretical Approach to Social Innovation: A Conceptual Typology and Implications

사회혁신의 이론적 고찰 : 개념의 유형화와 함의

  • 정서화 (한국행정연구원 정부혁신연구실)
  • Received : 2017.11.15
  • Accepted : 2017.12.13
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

The main aim of this study is a meta-theoretical investigation to explain the current theoretical landscape of social innovation theories and researches. First of all, this paper makes a typology of social innovation based on concepts and sectors of social innovation. Second, in terms of societal innovation, which it is a kind of social innovation systematic approach, this paper draws some implications for social innovation policy. My key argument is that social innovation could be specified in three different sectors, public innovation, market innovation, and social economy innovation. However, all of them have attention to such as improving a quality of life and making society more sustainable, so it can be argued that those different sectors are structured on social innovation altogether with common goals. Finally, in order to activate the social innovation ecosystem, the government has to play a key role as a facilitator to make sustainable networks and a governance of social innovation that is needed to coordinate between different features and roles of social innovation sectors.

이 연구의 목적은 단편적으로 이루어졌던 사회혁신 연구를 메타적으로 접근해 사회혁신의 이론지형을 통합적으로 설명하는 것에 있다. 이를 위해 사회혁신의 개념과 영역에 초점을 맞춘 유형화를 시도하여 이를 사회혁신체제의 관점에서 재해석해 사회혁신 및 관련정책에 있어 새로운 시사점을 제공하고자 한다. 분석에 따르면, 사회혁신은 삶의 질 향상, 지속가능한 사회로의 변환을 위한 공통의 목표를 중심으로 공공혁신, 시장혁신, 사회적 경제혁신으로 세분화되어 전체 구조를 형성하고 있다. 이러한 분석을 기반으로 하여 사회혁신 생태계의 활성화를 위해 사회혁신 영역별 행위자 특성과 역할에 따라 사회혁신 거버넌스를 운영할 필요가 있으며 네트워크 촉진자로서 정부역할의 변화가 요구된다는 시사점을 도출하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김왕동.박미영.장영배.송위진 (2014), 사회적 도전과제 해결을 위한 출연(연)의 역할과 과제, 과학기술정책연구원.
  2. 송위진 (2013), "사회.기술시스템론과 과학기술혁신정책", 기술혁신학회지, 16(1): 156-175.
  3. 정서화 (2016), 사회목표 지향 공공연구개발 모델 연구 : 사회혁신 구조의 형성과 국가 역할의 진화, 서울과학기술대학교 박사학위논문.
  4. 희망제작소 (2008), Mulgan interview. http://www.makehope.org(2017. 2. 7 접근).
  5. Almirall, E. and Wareham, J. (2011), "Living Labs: arbiters of mid-and ground-level innovation", Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(1): 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.537110
  6. Australian Social Innovation Exchange (2008), Social Innovation at the Heart of Australia's National Innovation System, submission to Review of the National Information System, April.
  7. Bekkers, V. J. J. M., Tummers, L.G. and Voorberg, W.H. (2013), From public innovation to social innovation in the public sector: A literature review of relevant drivers and barriers, Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  8. BEPA. (2010), Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union, Bureau of European Policy Advisors (BEPA), Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation. pdf.
  9. Bos, B. and Grin, J. (2008), "'Doing' Reflexive Modernization in Pig Husbandry The Hard Work of Changing the Course of a River", Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(4): 480-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306697
  10. Brundtland, G. H. (1987), Report of the World Commission on environment and development: our common future, United Nations.
  11. Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014), "Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82: 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
  12. Caracostas, P., and Mulder, U. (1998), Society, The Endless Frontier: a European vision of research and innovation policies for the 21st Century, European Commission.
  13. Centre for Social Innovation (2010), Social Innovation, Government of Canada, http://socialinnovation.ca/about/social-innovation.
  14. Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R. and Sadtler, T. M. (2006), "Disruptive innovation for social change", Harvard business review, 84: 94-101.
  15. Cova, B. and Svanfeldt, C. (1993), "Societal innovations and the postmodern aestheticization of everyday life", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(3): 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(93)90012-N
  16. Dal Fiore, F. (2007), "Communities versus networks: The implications on innovation and social change", American Behavioral Scientist, 50(7): 857-866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206298311
  17. Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. (2013), "Social Innovation, Social Economy and Social Enterprise: What Can the European Debate Tell Us", In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 40-52.
  18. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. W. (1983), "The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields", American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  19. EU. (2012), Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, European Union
  20. Felt, U., Igelsbock, J., Schikowitz, A. and Volker, T. (2016), "Transdisciplinary sustainability research in practice: between imaginaries of collective experimentation and entrenched academic value orders", Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4): 732-761. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989
  21. Franz, H. W., Hochgerner, J. and Howaldt, J. (2012), "Challenge social innovation: An introduction", In Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for business, social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1-16.
  22. Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  23. Grin, J., Rotmans, J. and Schot, J. (2010), Transition to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, NY, London: Routledge.
  24. Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (2001), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Hamalainen, T. and Heiskala, R. (2007), Social innovations, institutional change, and economic performance: making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions, and societies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  26. Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Pel, B., Dumitru, A., Kemp, R., Longhurst, N., Chilvers, J . and Wittmayer, J. M. (2016a), A framework for Transformative Social Innovation, TRANSIT Working Paper #5, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
  27. Haxeltine A., J rgensen, M. S., Pel, B., Dumitru, A., Avelino, F., Bauler, T., Lema Blanco, I., Chilvers, J., Cipolla, C., Dorland, J., Elle, M., Garido, S., Kemp, R., Kunze, I., Longhurst, N., Pataki, G., Rach, S., Renema, J., Ruijsink, S., Strasser, T., Tawakol, D., Weaver, P. and Wittmayer J. M. (2016b), On the agency and dynamics of transformative social innovation, TRANSIT working paper #7, TRANSIT: EU SSH.2013.3.2-1 Grant agreement no: 613169.
  28. Howaldt, J. and Schwarz, M. (2010), Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends, Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund.
  29. Hubert, A. (2012), "Foreword I. Challenge Social Innovation", In Franz, H. W., Hochgerner, J. and Howaldt J. (Eds.), Challenge Social Innovation: Potentials for Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. v-x.
  30. Huddart, S. (2012), "Renewing the Future: Social Innovation Systems, Sector Shift, and Innoweave", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(7): 5-9.
  31. Katarsis. (2009), Deliverable 4 - DISSEM, WP4 Social Innovation (Integration Exercise).
  32. Levesque, B. (2013), "Social innovation in governance and public management systems: toward a new paradigm", In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. and Hamdouch, A. (Eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 23-39.
  33. Lehtola, V. V. and Stahle, P. (2014), "Societal innovation at the interface of the state and civil society", Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(2): 152-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2014.863995
  34. Lin, C. Y. Y. and Chen, J. (2016), "Definition and Comparison of Societal Innovation and Social Innovation", In Lin, C., Yeh-Yun, C. and Chen, J.(Eds.), The Impact of Societal and Social Innovation, Singapore: Springer, pp. 5-17.
  35. Markard, J., Raven, R. and Truffer, B. (2012), "Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects", Research Policy, 41(6): 955-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
  36. Meadows, Dennis (1972): Die Grenzen des Wachstums. Bericht des Club of Rome zur Lage der Menschheit, Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt.
  37. Moore, M. L. and Westley, F. (2011), "Surmountable chasms: networks and social innovation for resilient systems", Ecology and society, 16(1): 5.
  38. Mulgan, G. (2006), "The process of social innovation", innovations, 1(2): 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
  39. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R. and Sanders, B. (2007), Social Innovation: What it Is, Why it Matters and How it Can Be Accelerated, Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship Working Paper.
  40. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2011), The open book of social innovation. The Young Foundation.
  41. Nicholls, A. and Murdock, A. (2012), "The Nature of Social Innovation", In Social Innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-30.
  42. Novy, A. and Leubolt, B. (2005), "Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: social innovation and the dialectical relationship of state and civil society", Urban studies, 42(11): 2023-2036. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279828
  43. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. and Stilgoe, J. (2012), "Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society", Science and Public Policy, 39(6): 751-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
  44. Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K. and Miller, D. T. (2008), "Rediscovering social innovation", Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4): 34-43.
  45. Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R. (2011), "The big idea: Creating shared value", Harvard Business Review, 89(1): 1-12.
  46. Pue, K., Vandergeest, C. and Breznitz, D. (2016), Toward a Theory of Social Innovation, Innovation Policy White Paper series, Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto.
  47. Rotmans, J. (2005), Societal innovation: between dream and reality lies complexity. Inaugural Speech, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  48. Salamon, L. M., Geller, S. L. and Mengel, K. L. (2010), "Nonprofits, innovation, and performance measurement: Separating fact from fiction", Communique, 17(1): 1-23.
  49. Schuurman, D. and Tõnurist, P. (2017), "Innovation in the Public Sector: Exploring the Characteristics and Potential of Living Labs and Innovation Labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(1): 7-14.
  50. Scott, R. (2007), "Prefatory chapter: institutions and social innovation" In Hamalainen, T.J., Heiskala, R. (Eds.), Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. viii-xxi.
  51. Swyngedouw, E. (2005), "Governance innovation and the citizen: the Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state", Urban studies, 42(11): 1991-2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869
  52. TEPSIE (2014), Social Innovation Theory and Research: A Summary of the Findings from TEPSIE, A deliverable of the project: "The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe" (TEPSIE), European Commission -7th Framework Programme, Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
  53. Tonurist, P., Kattel, R. and Lember, V. (2015), Discovering innovation labs in the public sector. The Other Canon, Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics, TUT Ragnar Nurkse School of Innovation and Governance.
  54. Tuomi, I. (2003), Networks of innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  55. van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. (2009), "How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well‐known similarity measures", Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(8): 1635-1651.
  56. von Hippel, E. (2005), Democratizing Innovation, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  57. Westley, F. (2008), The social innovation dynamic, SiG@ Waterloo.
  58. Westley, F. and Antadze, N. (2010), "Making a difference: Strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact", Innovation Journal, 15(2): 1-19.
  59. Williamson, B. (2015), Testing Governance: The Laboratory Lives and Methods of Policy Innovation Labs, Working Paper. Stirling: University of Stirling.
  60. Young Foundation (2010), Study on Social Innovation. European Union.