Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society (기술혁신학회지)

Korea Technology Innovation Society (한국기술혁신학회)
권호 표지

Exploring Possibilities of Intermediary Living Lab as a Platform

중간지원조직의 리빙랩 현황과 플랫폼으로서의 발전 가능성 탐색

  • Received : 2017.09.25
  • Accepted : 2017.12.18
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines the case of living lab led by intermediary and explores the development possibility as living lab platform. The analyzed cases are 'The Seoul Innovation Park Living lab', 'Korea Senior Living lab' of Seongnam Senior Experience complex, and 'Disaster Safety Living lab'. As a result of the analysis, all three cases have formed a user panel to form a living lab platform, and provide living lab service to internal and external organizations. A common feature that combines a technology platform with a 4Ps-based governance platform is identified. However, the characteristics, the meaning, and the process are different from case to case. In the future, the living lab platform needs to share learning experiences that are going on individually, since domestic living lab platform is in the early stage. Through this, it is necessary to seek collaboration and cooperation with related similar projects, and to jointly promote institutional and physical infrastructures related to living labs.

본 연구는 중간지원조직 주도의 리빙랩 사례를 살펴보고 리빙랩 플랫폼으로의 발전가능성을 탐색한다. 분석 사례는 국내에서 중간지원조직 주도로 리빙랩 플랫폼을 구축한 대표 사례인 '서울혁신파크리빙랩', 성남 고령친화종합체험관의 '한국시니어리빙랩', '재난대응분야 리빙랩'을 대상으로 한다. 분석결과 세 가지 사례 모두 사용자 패널을 구축하여 리빙랩 플랫폼을 형성하고 내 외부 조직에 리빙랩 운영 서비스를 제공하기 위한 과정이 진행되었다. 또한 기술플랫폼에 4Ps 기반의 거버넌스 플랫폼이 결합된 공통적인 특징을 도출할 수 있었다. 그러나 각 사례가 내포하고 있는 의의와 성격, 추진체계는 서로 다른 양상을 보인다. 현재 국내의 리빙랩 플랫폼은 확산되어 가는 초기 단계이기 때문에 향후 리빙랩 플랫폼은 개별적으로 진행되고 있는 리빙랩 경험을 공유하여 공동학습이 진행될 필요가 있다. 이를 통해 관련 유사 사업과의 연계 및 협력 방안을 모색하고, 리빙랩 관련 제도적 기반 및 인프라 정비를 공동으로 추진할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김수영 (2017.5.2), "소방과학연구실 재난대응분야 리빙랩 시스템 서비스 사업 설명서", 과학기술+사회혁신 포럼(2017.5.2.) 발표자료.
  2. 이영성.김희대 (2016), ICT.SW융합 지역사회 문제해결, 정책연구(2016-08), 미래창조과학부.
  3. 성지은.조예진 (2013), "시스템 전환과 지역 기반 전환 실험", 과학기술정책, 193: 27-45.
  4. 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2013), "리빙랩의 운영체계와 사례", STEPI Insight, 127.
  5. 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2014), "사용자 주도형 혁신모델로서 리빙랩 사례 분석과 적용 가능성 탐색", 기술혁신학회지, 17(2): 309-333.
  6. 성지은.정서화 (2015), "지속가능한 도시 전환관리 : MUSIC 프로젝트 사례 분석과 정책 과제", STEPI Insight, 171.
  7. 성지은.송위진.김종선.정서화.한규영 (2016가), 기술 사업화 및 사회적 활용.확산을 위한 리빙랩 구축 방안 연구, 미래창조과학부.
  8. 성지은.한규영.박인용 (2016나), "국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제", STEPI Insight, 184.
  9. 성지은.한규영.정서화 (2016다), "지역문제 해결을 위한 국내 리빙랩 사례 분석", 과학기술학 연구, 16(2): 65-98.
  10. 성지은.박인용 (2016), "시스템 전환 실험의 장으로서 리빙랩: 사례분석과 시사점", 기술혁신학회지, 19(1): 1-28.
  11. 성지은.송위진.정병걸.최창범.윤찬영.정서화.한규영 (2017), 국내 리빙랩 현황 분석과 발전 방안 연구, 과학기술정책연구원(발간예정).
  12. 손상영.안일태.이철남 (2009), 방송.통신 융합 환경에서의 플랫폼 경쟁정책, 정보통신정책 연구원.
  13. 송위진.성지은.김연철.황혜란.정재용 (2007), 脫추격형 기술혁신체제의 모색, 과학기술정책연구원.
  14. 송위진 (2012), "Living Lab: 사용자 주도의 개방형 혁신모델", Issues & Policy, 59, 과학기술정책연구원.
  15. 송위진.성지은 (2013), 사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술혁신정책, 서울 : 한울.
  16. 송위진.성지은.김종선.장영배.정병걸.이은경 (2014), 사회문제 해결형 혁신에서 사용자 참여 활성화 방안 : 사회.기술시스템 전환의 관점, 과학기술정책연구원.
  17. 송위진.성지은.김종선.장영배.정서화.박인용 (2015), 사회.기술시스템 전환 전략 연구사업 (1차년도), 과학기술정책연구원.
  18. 정덕영 (2016), "성남 고령친화종합체험관 리빙랩 운영계획", 한국 시니어 리빙랩 개소 기념 워크숍 발표자료(2016.5.26.).
  19. 정덕영 (2017) "성남 고령친화종합체험관 한국시니어리빙랩 소개", 과학기술+사회혁신 포럼 (2017.1.24.) 발표자료.
  20. Daniel Kim.성지은 (2015), "지속가능한 에너지 시스템 전환을 위한 리빙랩 : SusLab NWE의 독일 보트롭 사례", STEPI Insight, 158, 과학기술정책연구원.
  21. 변지민 (2017), "'노인용 기립 비데' 탄생의 비밀?!", 동아사이언스, http://www.dongascience. com/news.php?idx=16218(접근일 : 2017.5.16.)
  22. 서울혁신파크 블로그 [1인가구주거빈곤개선의 실험] 공모안내(2016).
  23. Almirall, Esteve, Melissa Lee and Jonathan Wareham (2012), "Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation methodologies", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 12-18.
  24. Alvaro Oliveira (2011), "European Perspective on User-Driven Innovation(Living Labs)", In Presentation, Living Labs Seminar, 9.
  25. Ballon, P., Pierson, J . and Delaere, S. (2005) , "Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovations: Examining European Practice", Conference Proceedings of 16th European Regional Conference by the International Telecommunications Society(ITS), Porto, Portugal, 4-6 September.
  26. Bergvall-Kareborn, B., C. Ihlstrom Eriksson, A. Stahlbrost and J. Svensson (2009), "A Milieu for Innovation: Defining Living Labs", Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating Recovery - The Role of Innovation Management, New York City, USA 6-9.
  27. Curley, M. (2013), "Open Innovation 2.0: Sustainable Economy & Society-Stability, jobs", Prosperity. Dublin, Ireland May 20-21.
  28. Curley, M. and Salmelin, B. (2014), "Open Innovation 2.0: The Big Picture in Open Innovation Yearbook 2014", European Commission.
  29. De Ruyter, B., Van Loenen, E. and Teeven, V. (2007), "User centered research in experiencelab", Ambient Intelligence, 305-313.
  30. ENoLL (2015), "Living Lab Services for business support & internationalisation".
  31. Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, A., Millard, L. and Wendler, J. (2015), "Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science", Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005
  32. Folstad, A. (2008), "Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Communication Technology: A Literature Review", The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organisations and Networks, 10: 99-131.
  33. Hakkarainen, L. and Hyysalo, S. (2016), "The Evolution of Intermediary Activities: Broadening the Concept of Facilitation in Living Labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1).
  34. Intille, S. S., Larson, K., Beaudin, J. S., Nawyn, J., Munguia Tapia, E. and Kaushik, P. (2005), "A Living Laboratory for the Design and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Computing Interfaces", In Extended Abstracts of the 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1941-1944, New York, NY: ACM Press.
  35. Intille, S. S., Larson, K., Munguia Tapia, E., Beaudin, J., Kaushik, P., Nawyn, J. and R. Rockinson, R. (2006), "Using a Live-In Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research", In K. P. Fishkin, B. Schiele, P. Nixon, & A. Quigley (Eds.), Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2006, LNCS 3968: 349-365. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
  36. Kuronen, M., Junnila, S., Majamaa, W. and Miiranen, I. (2010), "Public-private-people partnership as a way to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from residental development", International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 14(3): 200-216. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2010.15
  37. Leminen, S. (Ed.) (2011), "Co-Creation with Users and Customers in Living Labs-Integrating Users and Customers in Companies' Business Processes", Laurea Julkaisut A76.
  38. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. and Nystrom, A. G. (2012), "Living Labs as open-innovation networks", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6-11.
  39. Leminen, S. and Westerlund, M. (2012), "Towards Innovation in Living Labs Network", International Journal of Product Development, 17(1/2): 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2012.051161
  40. Leminen, S. (2013), "Coordination and participation in living lab networks", Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(11): 5-14.
  41. Leminen, S. and Westerlund, M. (2014), "Incremental and Radical Service Innovation in Living Labs", In B. Christiansen, S. Yildiz, & E. Yildiz (Eds.), Transcultural Marketing for Incremental & Radical Innovation: 281-295. Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference.
  42. Leminen, S. (2015), "Q&A. What Are Living Labs?", Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(9): 29-35.
  43. Lopez-Vega, H. and Vanhaverbeke, W. (2009), "Connecting open and closed innovation markets: A typology of intermediaries".
  44. McPhee, C., Leminen, S., Schuurman, D., Westerlund, M. and Huizingh, E. (2016), "Editorial: Living Labs and User Innovation", Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1): 3-6.
  45. Molinari, F. (2011), "Living labs as multi-stakeholder platforms for the egovernance of innovation", In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 131-140, ACM.
  46. Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M. and Hribernik, K. A. (2006), "State-of-the-Art and Good Practice in the Field of Living Labs", In K. S.Thoben, Pawar, M. Taisch, & S. Terzi (Eds.) . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks: 349-357, Milan, Italy: Nottingham University Business School.
  47. Pallot, M. (2009), "The Living Lab Approach: A User Centred Open Innovation Ecosystem", Webergence Blog, http://www.cweprojects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/715404
  48. Pino, M. et al. (2013), "Key Factors for a Framework Supporting the Design", Provision, and Assessment of Assistive Technology for Dementia Care.
  49. Tukiainen, T., Leminen, S. and Westerlund, M. (2015), "Cities as collaborative innovation platforms", Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10): 16-23. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/933
  50. Van der Walt, J. S., Buitendag, A. A., Zaaiman, J. J. and van Vuuren, J. J. (2009), "Community living lab as a collaborative innovation environment", Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6: 421-436. https://doi.org/10.28945/1070
  51. Veeckman, C., Lievens, B., Schuurman, D. and De Moor, S. (2012), "The impact of the organizational set-up of Living Labs on the innovation process: a case study between different Living Lab approaches in Flanders", In International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM) Conference Proceedings.
  52. Westerlund, M. and Leminen, S. (2011), "Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: experiences from Living Labs", Technology Innovation Management Review, 1(1).