Environmental Engineering Research

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.95-107
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-1025(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-968X(eISSN)
대한환경공학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Adsorption isotherm and kinetics analysis of hexavalent chromium and mercury on mustard oil cake

  • Reddy, T. Vishnuvardhan (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati) ;
  • Chauhan, Sachin (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati) ;
  • Chakraborty, Saswati (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.21
  • 심사 : 2016.10.31
  • 발행 : 2017.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Adsorption equilibrium and kinetic behavior of two toxic heavy metals hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] and mercury [Hg(II)] on mustard oil cake (MOC) was studied. Isotherm of total chromium was of concave type (S1 type) suggesting cooperative adsorption. Total chromium adsorption followed BET isotherm model. Isotherm of Hg(II) was of L3 type with monolayer followed by multilayer formation due to blockage of pores of MOC at lower concentration of Hg(II). Combined BET-Langmuir and BET-Freundlich models were appropriate to predict Hg(II) adsorption data on MOC. Boyd's model confirmed that external mass transfer was rate limiting step for both total chromium and Hg(II) adsorptions with average diffusivity of $1.09{\times}10^{-16}$ and $0.97m^2/sec$, respectively. Desorption was more than 60% with Hg(II), but poor with chromium. The optimum pH for adsorptions of total chromium and Hg(II) were 2-3 and 5, respectively. At strong acidic pH, Cr(VI) was adsorbed by ion exchange mechanism and after adsorption reduced to Cr(III) and remained on MOC surface. Hg(II) removal was achieved by complexation of $HgCl_2$ with deprotonated amine ($-NH_2$) and carboxyl (COO-) groups of MOC.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Zhou J, Wang Y, Wang J, Qia W, Long D, Ling L. Effective removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by adsorption on mesoporous carbon microspheres. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 2016;462:200-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.001
  2. Liu T, Wang Z, Yan X, Zhang B. Removal of mercury(II) and chromium(VI) from wastewater using a new and effective composite: Pumice-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron. Chem. Eng. J. 2014;245:34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.011
  3. Central Pollution Control Board. General standards for discharge of environmental pollutants part-A: Effluents. Schedule VI of Environment (protection) third amendment rules, India; 1993.
  4. Dinker MK, Kulkarni PS. Recent advances in silica-based materials for the removal of hexavalent chromium: A review. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2015;60:2521-2540. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.5b00292
  5. Feng N, Guo X, Liang S, Zhu Y, Liu J. Biosorption of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by chemically modified orange peel. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.114
  6. Gupta VK, Nayak A, Agarwal S. Bioadsorbents for remediation of heavy metals: Current status and their future prospects. Environ. Eng. Res. 2015;20:1-18. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2015.018
  7. Khan MA, Ngabura M, Choong TSY, Masood H, Chuah LA. Biosorption and desorption of Nickel on oil cake: Batch and column studies. Bioresource Technol. 2012;103:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.09.065
  8. Bulgariu L, Hlihor RM, Bulgariu D, Gavrilescu M. Sorptive removal of cadmium(II) ions from aqueous solution by mustard biomass. Environ. Eng. Manage. J. 2012;11:1969-1976.
  9. Ajmal M, Rao RAK, Khan MA. Adsorption of copper from aqueous solution on Brassica cumpestris (mustard oil cake). J. Hazard. Mater. 2005;B122:177-183.
  10. Fiol N, Villaescusa E. Determination of sorbent point zero charge: Usefulness in sorption studies. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2009;7:79-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-008-0139-0
  11. APHA, AWWA, WPCF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington D.C.: American Public Health Association; 2005.
  12. Saha B, Chakraborty S, Das G. Trimesic acid coated alumina: An efficient multi-cyclic adsorbent for toxic Cu(II). J. colloid Interf. Sci. 2008;320:30-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2008.01.011
  13. Kalsi PS. Spectroscopy of organic compounds. 6th ed. Delhi: New Age International Publishers; 1994. p. 108-110.
  14. Mishra A, Dubey A, Shinghal S. Biosorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions using waste plant biomass. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;12:1415-1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0516-0
  15. Bertagnolli C, Silva MGC, Guibal E. Chromium biosorption using the residue of alginate extraction from Sargassum filipendula. Chem. Eng. J. 2014;237:362-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.024
  16. Saman N, Johari K, Tien SS, Mat H. Removal of Hg(II) and $CH_3Hg(I)$ using rasped pith sago residue biosorbent. Clean-Soil Air Water 2014;42:1541-1548. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300128
  17. Lopes CB, Oliveira JR, Rocha LS, et al. Cork stoppers as an effective sorbent for water treatment: the removal of mercury at environmentally relevant concentrations and conditions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014;21:2108-2121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-2104-0
  18. Foo KY, Hameed BH. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;156:2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013
  19. Giles CH, Smith D, Huitson A. A general treatment and classification of the solute adsorption isotherm. I: Theoretical. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 1974;47:755-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(74)90252-5
  20. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985;57:603-619. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603
  21. Juang R, Shiau J. Adsorption isotherms of phenols from water onto macro reticular resins. J. Hazard. Mater. 1999;B70:171-183.
  22. Rorrer GL, Hsien T. Synthesis of porous-magnetic chitosan beads for removal of cadmium ions from waste water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993;32:2170-2178. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00021a042
  23. Weber WJ, Morris JC. Kinetics of adsorption on carbon from solutions. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1963;89:31-60.
  24. Reichenberg D. Properties of ion-exchange resins in relation to their structure. III. Kinetics of exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953;75:589-597. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01099a022
  25. Krishnani KK, Meng X, Christodoulatos C, Boddu VM. Biosorption mechanism of nine different heavy metals onto biomatrix from rice husk. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;153:1222-1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.113
  26. Kumar PA, Ray M, Chakraborty S. Adsorption behaviour of trivalent chromium on amine-based polymer aniline formaldehyde condensate. Chem. Eng. J. 2009;149:340-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.11.030
  27. Lee M, Hong K, Shin-Ya Y, Kajiuchi T. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by chitosan-based polymeric surfactants. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 2005;96:44-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21356
  28. Lippard SJ, Berg JM. Principles of bioinorganic chemistry. Mill Valley, CA: Univ. Science Books; 1994. p. 21-22, 28-29.
  29. Kawamura Y, Mitsuhashi M, Tanibe H. Adsorption of metal ions on polyaminated highly porous chitosan chelating resin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993;32:386-391. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00014a015
  30. Das SK, Das AR, Guha AK. A study on the adsorption mechanism of mercury on Aspergillus versicolor biomass. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007;41:8281-8287. https://doi.org/10.1021/es070814g

피인용 문헌

  1. Synergistic and inhibitory reduction of Cr(VI) by montmorillonite, citric acid, and Mn(II) pp.1614-7480, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1748-7
  2. Facile preparation of a tetraethylenepentamine-functionalized nano magnetic composite material and its adsorption mechanism to anions: competition or cooperation vol.8, pp.19, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00237A
  3. Hexavalent chromium adsorption from aqueous solution using orange peel modified with calcium chloride: equilibrium and kinetics study vol.11, pp.17, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2018/v11i17/122244
  4. Application of ANN Predictive Model for the Design of Batch Adsorbers - Equilibrium Simulation of Cr(VI) Adsorption onto Activated Carbon vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501913010069
  5. Cr(VI) removal using Fe2O3-chitosan-cherry kernel shell pyrolytic charcoal composite beads vol.25, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.112
  6. Novel adsorption model of filtration process in polycarbonate track-etched membrane: Comparative study vol.25, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.136
  7. A novel activated carbon from human hair waste: Synthesis, characterization and utilization thereof as an efficient, reusable Ni (II) adsorbent vol.4, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100141
  8. Sorption and leaching potential of organophosphorus insecticide dimethoate in Croatian agricultural soils vol.273, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128563