DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Switching performances of multivarite VSI chart for simultaneous monitoring correlation coefficients of related quality variables

  • Received : 2017.02.28
  • Accepted : 2017.03.20
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

There are many researches showing that when a process change has occurred, variable sampling intervals (VSI) control chart is better than the fixed sampling interval (FSI) control chart in terms of reducing the required time to signal. When the process engineers use VSI control procedure, frequent switching between different sampling intervals can be a complicating factor. However, average number of samples to signal (ANSS), which is the amount of required samples to signal, and average time to signal (ATS) do not provide any control statistics about switching performances of VSI charts. In this study, we evaluate numerical switching performances of multivariate VSI EWMA chart including average number of switches to signal (ANSW) and average switching rate (ASWR). In addition, numerical study has been carried out to examine how to improve the performance of considered chart with accumulate-combine approach under several different smoothing constant and sample size. In conclusion, process engineers, who want to manage the correlation coefficients of related quality variables, are recommended to make sample size as large and smoothing constant as small as possible under permission of process conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Alt, F. B. (1984). Multivariate control charts. In Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, edited by S. Kotz and M. L. Johnson, Wiley, New York.
  2. Amin, R. W. and Hemasinha, R. (1993). The switching behavior of $\bar{X}$ charts with variable sampling intervals. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 22, 2081-2102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610929308831136
  3. Amin, R. W. and Letsinger, W. C. (1991). Improved switching rules in control procedures using variable sampling intervals. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 20, 205-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919108812949
  4. Amin, R. W. and Miller, R. W. (1993). A robustness study of $\bar{X}$ charts with variable sampling intervals. Journal of Quality Technology, 25, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1993.11979414
  5. Arnold, J. C. (1970). A Markovian sampling policy applied to quality monitoring of streams. Biometrics, 26, 739-747. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528720
  6. Bai, D. S. and Lee, K. T. (2002). Variable sampling interval $\bar{X}$ control charts with an improved switching rule. International Journal of Production Economiccs, 76, 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00161-X
  7. Chang, D. J. (2015). Comparison of two sampling intervals and three sampling intervals VSI charts for monitoring both means and variances. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 26, 997-1006. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2015.26.4.997
  8. Crosier, R. B. (1988). Multivariate generalization of cumulative sum quality-control scheme. Technometrics, 30, 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1988.10488402
  9. Hotelling, H. (1947). Multivariate quality control. Techniques of Statistical Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 111-184.
  10. Hwang, C. (2016). Multioutput LS-SVR based residual MCUSUM control chart for autocorrelated process. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 27, 523-530. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2016.27.2.523
  11. Jackson, J. E. (1985). Multivariate quality control. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Method, 14, 2657-2688. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610928508829069
  12. Jeong, J. I. and Cho, G. Y. (2012). Multivariate Shewhart control charts for monitoring the variance-covariance matrix. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 23, 617-628. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.3.617
  13. Lowry, C. A., Woodall, W. H., Champ, C. W. and Rigdon, S. E. (1992). A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control charts. Technometrics, 34, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269551
  14. Park, J. S. and Cho, G. Y. (2013). Parameter estimation in a readjustment procedures in the multivariate integrated process control. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 24, 1275-1283. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.6.1275
  15. Pignatiello, J. J. and Runger, G. C. (1990). Comparisons of multivariate CUSUM charts. Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1990.11979237
  16. Reynolds, Jr, M. R. (1989). Optimal variable sampling interval control charts with variable sampling intervals. Sequential Analysis, 8, 361-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474948908836187
  17. Reynolds, Jr, M. R., Amin, R. W. and Arnold, J. C. (1990). CUSUM charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics, 32, 371-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1990.10484721
  18. Reynolds, Jr, M. R., Amin, R. W., Arnold, J. C. and Nachalas, J. A. (1988). $\bar{X}$ - charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics, 30, 181-192.
  19. Reynolds, Jr, M. R. and Arnold, J. C. (1989). Optimal one-sided Shewhart control charts with variable sampling intervals between samples. Sequential Analysis, 8, 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474948908836167
  20. Roberts, S. W. (1959). Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics, 1, 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860
  21. Shamma, S. E., Amin, R. W. and Shamma, A. K. (1991). A double exponentially weighted moving aver-age control procedure with variable sampling intervals. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 20, 511-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919108812969