DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of dry aging on physicochemical properties of beef cattle loins

건조숙성에 따른 육우 등심의 이화학적 특성에 미치는 영향

  • Choe, Ju-Hui (Department of Food and Bioproduct Sciences, Saskatchewan University) ;
  • Kim, Hack-Youn (Department of Animal Resource Science, Kongju National University)
  • 최주희 (사스카치완대학교 식품생물과학과) ;
  • 김학연 (공주대학교 동물자원학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.28
  • Accepted : 2016.10.27
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

This study investigated the quality change in dry aged beef cattle loins (temperature: $3{\pm}1$, lative humidity: $75{\pm}5%$, period: 14 days), compared to non-aged beef cattle loins (control). The water content of dry aged loins was lower than that of the control (p<0.001). The fat content, protein content, pH value, and redness in dry aged loins were higher than in the control. Moreover, dry aging significantly improved the water holding capacity and cooking yield of beef cattle loin (p<0.001). The shear force of dry aged loins was significantly lower than in the control (p<0.01). The flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptability of dry aged loins were higher than in the control according to sensory evaluation. Therefore, dry aging can improve the quality properties of beef cattle loins.

본 연구는 숙성고의 온도와 상대습도를 각각 $3{\pm}2$$75{\pm}5%$로 설정하고 14일간 건조숙성(dry aging)된 건조숙성 육우 등심과 비건조숙성 육우 등심을 비교하였다. 건조숙성 육우의 수분함량이 비건조숙성 육우보다 낮은 반면(p<0.001), 단백질함량과 지방함량은 건조숙성 육우가 비건조숙성 육우보다 높은 함량을 보였다. 건조숙성 육우의 pH와 적색도가 비건조숙성 육우보다 높은 값을 나타내었다. 건조숙성 육우의 보수력과 가열수율은 비건조숙성 육우보다 유의적으로 높은 값을 나타냈다(p<0.001). 그러나 건조숙성 육우의 전단력은 비건조숙성 육우보다 유의적으로 낮게 나타났다(p<0.01). 관능평가에서 풍미, 연도, 다즙성과 전체적인 기호도는 건조숙성 육우가 비건조숙성 육우보다 유의적으로 높은 평가를 받았다. 따라서 육우에 건조숙성 공정을 접목한다면 연도와 풍미가 증진된 건조숙성 육우를 제조할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim BK, Park CE, Lee EJ, Kim YS, Kim BS, Kim JC. Effect of quality grade on the physicochemical and sensory properties of hanwoo. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 33: 287-293 (2013) https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2013.33.2.287
  2. Cho SJ, Lee YG. Problems of dairy beef and measures for stabilization. Korean J. Agri. Manage. Pol. 40: 686-702 (2013)
  3. Park SY, Kim HY. Effect of Nacl concentration on physicochemical properties of pork emulsion. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 45: 551-556 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.4.551
  4. Kim HY, Kim GW, Jeong HG. Development of tteokgalbi added with red pepper seed powder. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 45: 255-260 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2016.45.2.255
  5. Lee HY, Yoon YH. Microbiological safety of dry-aging meat. Safe Food 10: 37-41 (2015)
  6. Kim JH, Cho SH, Seong PN, Hah KH, Kim HK, Park BY, Lee JM, Kim DH, Ahn CN. Effect of aging temperature and time on the meat quality of longissinus muscle from hanwoo steer. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 27: 171-178 (2007) https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.2.171
  7. Smith RD, Nicholson KL, Nicholson JDW, Harris KB, Miller RK, Griffin DB, Savell JW. Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer palatability evaluations of steaks from US Choice and US Select short loins. Meat Sci. 79: 631- 639 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.10.028
  8. Laville E, Sayd T, Morael M, Blinet S, Chambom C, Lepetit J, Renand G, Gocquette JF. Proteome changes during meat aging in tough and tender beef suggest the improtance of apoptosis and protein solubility for beef aging and tenderization. J. Agr. Food Chem. 57: 10755-10764 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf901949r
  9. Lee CW, Lee SH, Min YJ, Lee SK, Jo CR, Jung SME. Quality improvement of strip loin from hanwoo with low quality grade by dry aging. Korean J. Food Nutr. 28: 415-421 (2015) https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2015.28.3.415
  10. Koutsidis G, Elmore JS, Oruna-Concha MJ, Campo MM, Wood JD, Mottram DS. Water-soluble precursors of beef flavour. Part : Effect of post-mortem conditioning. Meat Sci. 58: 17-23 (2008)
  11. Campbell RE, Hunt MC, Levis P, Chambers E. Dry-aging effects on palatability of beef longissimus muscle. J. Food Sci. 66: 196-199 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.tb11315.x
  12. Sitz BM, Calkins CR, Feuz DM, Umberger WJ, Eskridge KM. Consumer sensory acceptance and value of wet-aged and dryaged beef steaks. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 1221-1226 (2006) https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.8451221x
  13. Warren KE, Kastner CL. A comparison of dry-aged and vacuumaged beef striploins. J. Muscle Food. 3: 151-157 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4573.1992.tb00471.x
  14. Parrish FC, Boles JA, Rust RE, Olson DG. Dry and wet aging effects on palatability attributes of beef loin and rib steaks from three quality grades. J. Food Sci. 56: 601-603 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb05338.x
  15. King MF, Matthews MA, Rule DC, Field RA. Effect of beef packaging method on volatile compounds developed by oven roasting or microwave cooking. J. Agr. Food Chem. 43: 773-778 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00051a039
  16. Laster MA, Smith RD, Nicholson KL, Nicholson JDW, Miller RK, Griffin DB, Harris KB, Sacell JW. Dry versus wet aging of beef: Retail cutting yields and consumer sensory attribute evaluations of steaks from ribeyes, strip loins, and top sirloins from two quality grade groups. Meat Sci. 80: 795-804 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.024
  17. Smith AM, Harris KB, Griffin DB, Miller RK, Kerth CR, Savell JW. Retail yields and palatability evaluations of individual muscles from wet-aged and dry-aged beef ribeyes and top sirlion butts that were merchandised innovatively. Meat Sci. 97: 21-26 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.12.013
  18. Khan MI, Jung SME, Nam KC, Jo CR. Postmortem aging of beef with a special reference to the dry aging. Korean J. Food Sci. An. 36: 159-169 (2016) https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.2.159
  19. AOAC. official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC, USA. pp. 777-788 (1990)
  20. Grau R, Hamm R. Eine einfache methode zur bestimmung der wasserbinding in muskel. Naturwissenschaften 40: 29-30 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00595734
  21. Ahnstrom ML, Seyfert M, Hunt MC, Johnson DE. Dry aging of beef in a bag highly permeable to water vapour. Meat Sci. 73: 674-679 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.006
  22. Kim YHB, Robert K, Linda MS. Effect of dry-aging on meat quality attributes and metabolite profiles of beef loins. Meat Sci. 111: 168-176 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.09.008
  23. Iida FK, Miyazaki YK, Tsuyuki RK, Kato KC, Egusa A, Ogoshi HR, Nishimura TH. Changes in taste compounds, breaking properties, and sensory attributes during dry aging of beef from Japanese black cattle. Meat Sci. 112: 46-51 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.10.015
  24. Moeseke WV, Smet SD. Effect of time of deboning and sample size on drip loss of pork. Meat Sci. 52: 151-156 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00162-4
  25. Kristensen L, Purslow PP. The effect of ageing on the waterholding capacity of pork: Role of cytoskeletal proteins. Meat Sci. 58: 17-23 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00125-X
  26. Swatland HJ. How pH causes paleness or darkness in chicken breast meat. Meat Sci. 80: 396-400 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.002
  27. Bechtel PJ, Parrish FC. Effects of postmortem storage and temperature on muscle protein degradation: Analysis by SDS gel electrophoresis. J. Food Sci. 48: 294-295(1983) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb14857.x
  28. Park HJ, Kim TH, Um KH, Kim JS, Kim BS, Song SH. Changes of qualities in dry-aged beef products made from 3rd quality grade hanwoo beef (Korean Native Cattle) according to aging periods. Food Eng. Prog. 20: 66-72 (2016)

Cited by

  1. A comparison of dry and wet aging on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of pork loin with two aging times pp.2092-6456, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0418-x