Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of titanium powder on the bond strength of metal heat treatment

티타늄 파우더가 금속의 열처리 시 결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Sa-Hak (Department of Dental Technology, Kyungdong University) ;
  • Kim, Wook-Tae (Department of Dental Technology and Science, College of Health Science, Shin-Han University)
  • 김사학 (경동대학교 치기공학과) ;
  • 김욱태 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과)
  • Received : 2017.01.14
  • Accepted : 2017.04.10
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Ni-Cr alloy does not contain Beryllium, causing the metal compound to form oxides in the furnace but by using Titanium as a chemical catalyst the forming of the oxides can be controlled, and by controlling the impurities formed on the metal surface, the possibility of the Ni-Cr alloy bond strength being increased can be analysed. Materials and Methods: Titanium was used as a chemical catalyst in the porcelain for the oxidation of beryllium-free metal (Ni-Cr) alloy. The T1 group, which does not use Titanium power as a chemical catalyst is a reference model for comparison. The T2 group and T3 group used 10 g and 20 g of Titanium power, respectively. They are fabricated to observe the shear bond strength and surface properties. There was no significance when One-way ANOVA analysis/Tukey Honestly Significant Difference Test was conducted for statistical analysis among groups (P > 0.05). Results: Results of measuring the three-point flexural bond strength of the Ni-Cr alloy and thickness of the oxide film. Experiment T3 using 20 g Titanium chemical catalyst: $39.22{\pm}3.41MPa$ and $6.66{\mu}m$, having the highest bond strength and thinness of oxide film. Experiment T2 using 10 g Titanium chemical catalyst: $34.65{\pm}1.39MPa$ and $13.22{\mu}m$. Experiment T1 using no Titanium chemical catalyst: $32.37{\pm}1.91MPa$ and $22.22{\mu}m$. Conclusion: The T2 and T3 experiments using Titanium chemical catalyst showed higher bond strength for the Ni-Cr alloy and lower thickness of oxide film than experiment T1, and the titanium catalyst being able to increase bond strength was observed.

목적: 본 연구는 베릴륨이 함유되지 않은 금속-도재용(Ni-Cr)합금 산화처리 시 도재로 안에 티타늄 파우더를 화학적 촉매로 이용하여 산화막을 억제하고, 금속 표면에 형성될 불순물을 제어하여 도재의 결합력을 증진시켜 줄 수 있는 가능성을 분석 하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 베릴륨이 함유되지 않은 금속-도재용(Ni-Cr)합금 산화처리 시 도재로 안에 티타늄을 화학적 촉매로 이용하였다. 티타늄 파우더를 화학적 촉매로 사용하지 않은 T1군을 대조군으로 하고, 10 g, 20 g 티타늄 파우더를 사용한 시편을 T2, T3군으로 분류하여 전단결합강도와 계면특성 관찰을 위하여 제작 하였다. 일원배치 분산분석(one-way ANOVA)은 그룹의 차이를 검사하기 위해서 시행하였고 사후 검정(Tukey Honestly Significant Difference test)은 그룹 간의 통계적 분석을 위하여 수행되었다. 결과: 티타늄 파우더를 화학적 촉매로 사용 한 T3군의 3점 굽힘 결합강도와 산화막 두께를 측정한 결과, $39.22{\pm}3.4MPa$와 $6.66{\mu}m$로 가장 높고, 얇게 나타났으며, T2군은 $34.65{\pm}1.39MPa$과 $13.22{\mu}m$, 티타늄 화학적 촉매로 사용하지 않은 대조군 T1군은 $32.37{\pm}1.91MPa$과 $22.22{\mu}m$ 순으로 나타났다. 결론: 시편들의 결합강도를 통계 분석한 결과, 티타늄 파우더를 화학적 촉매로 사용한 실험 T3, T2군의 결합력이 높게 나타났고, 산화막 두께 역시 대조군 T1군 보다 얇게 나타나 것으로 결합력 증진에 영향을 줄 수 있음이 관찰 되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Wataha JC, Messer RL. Casting alloys. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:499-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.010
  2. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied dental materials. 7th ed. London; Mass Publishing Co.; 1994. p.71-8.
  3. Oshida Y, Fung LW, Isikbay SC. Titanium-porcelain system. Part II: bond strength of fired porcelain on nitrided pure titanium. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7: 13-34.
  4. Cascone PJ, Massimo M, Tuccillo JJ. Theoretical interfacial reactions responsible for bonding in porcelain-to-metal systems. Part II-Oxidation of alloys. J Dent Res 1978;57:872. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345780570090501
  5. Sakaguchi R, Powers J. Resin composite restorative materials. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. St. Lousis; Mosby Elsevier; 2006. p. 189-212.
  6. Morris HF. Properties of cobalt-chromium metal ceramic alloys after heat treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:426-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90232-2
  7. Pierce LH, Goodkind RJ. A status report of possible risks of base metal alloys and their components. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:234-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90320-X
  8. Magnusson B, Bergman M, Bergman B, Soremark R. Nickel allergy and nickel-containing dental alloys. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:163-7.
  9. Wang RR, Welsch GE, Monteriro O. Silicon nitride coating on titanium to enable titanium-ceramic bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;46:262-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199908)46:2<262::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-1
  10. Walter M, Reppel PD, Boning K, Freesmeyers WB. Six-year follow-up of titanium and high-gold porcelain-fused-to metal fixed partial dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:91-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00373.x
  11. Kaus T, Probster L, Weber H. Clinical follow-up study of ceramic veneered titanium restorations - three-year results. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:9-15.
  12. Sandrock G, Gross K, Thomas G. Effect of Ticatalyst content on the reversible hydrogen storage properties of the sodium alanates. J Alloy Compd 2002;339:299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(01)02014-X
  13. Matkovic T, Slokar L, Matkovic P. Structure and properties of biomedical Co-Cr-Ti alloys. J Alloy Compd 2006;407:294-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.06.025
  14. Dent RJ, Preston JD, Moffa JP, Caputo A. Effect of oxidation on ceramometal bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:59-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90243-8
  15. O'brien WJ, Seluk LW, Fan PL, Saunders DN. Classification of porcelain enamel interfacial fractures. J Dent Res 1976;55:506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345760550033301
  16. Lenz J, Schwarz S, Schwickerath H, Sperner F, Schafer A. Bond strength of metal-ceramic systems in three-point flexure bond test. J Appl Biomater. 1995;6:55-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/jab.770060108
  17. Barghi N, Lorenzana RE. Optimum thickness of opaque and body porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:429-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90080-4
  18. DeHoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Hathcock PW. An evaluation of the four point flexural test for metalceramic bond strength. J Dent Res 1982;61:1066-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610090801
  19. Choi BK, Han JS, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim SH. Shear bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia and metal cores. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:129-35. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2009.1.3.129
  20. Kelly JR, Rose TC. Nonprecious alloys for use in fixed prosthodontics: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:363-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90279-2
  21. Bondioli IR, Bottino MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength at the interface of two porcelains and pure titanium injected into the casting mold at three different temperatures. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:541-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.03.033
  22. Shell JS, Nielsen JP. Study of the bond between gold alloys and porcelain. J Dent Res 1962;41:1424-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345620410062101
  23. Okabe T, Hero H, The use of titanium in dentistry. Cell Mater 1995;5:211-30.
  24. Adachi M, Mackert JR Jr, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti6Al-4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060101