DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Safety Education Contents of 『Field of home life』 in Technology·Home Economics Textbook developed by the revised curriculum in 2009

2009 개정 기술·가정 교과서 『가정생활영역』의 안전교육 내용 분석

  • Received : 2016.11.08
  • Accepted : 2017.06.03
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The Purpose of this study is to present the basic data for selecting and improving the safety education contents which help practically middle school students through analysis of contents of safety education in 'field of home life' of 2009 revised middle school textbooks. The subjects of analysis are 12 types of middle school textbooks: in total 24 books written by 12 publishers in terms of the revised curriculum in 2009. The analysis criteria is developed by the researcher referring to preceding studies regarding safety education based on the seventh safety education standard presented by the Ministry of Education (2015). With such analysis criteria, all words related to the contents of the safety education of analysis criteria were extracted from each textbook, such as words directly mentioned as 'safety', words mean as 'psychological safety' and 'happy life', words related to 'attention', 'note', 'stability' etc. Under the analytic frame of safety education contents according to a home economics textbook, content analysis method was used for producing the frequency and percent of those words. The textbook analysis shows that the number of pages regarding safety education is 336.3 pages, as 9.8% in total 3,412 pages of 12 types of technology and home economics textbooks. As following the analysis of each textbook volume of the proportion in the contents related to safety education, 224.9 pages are on the first volume and 111.9 pages are on the second volume. As grades increase from year one to year three, the proportion of safety education in home economics textbooks is decreased. The highest number of safety education contents unit is 'Self-management of youth' which includes three parts of safety education. In the case of a unit for emphasizing practice, experience and practical exercise such as 'Life of youth' and 'Practice of eco-living', safety education content in the area of 'life safety' are mostly contained. Safety accidents related to the most student experienced, Household accidents (1.4%) and experiment or practice accidents (0.3%) are presented in a low figure. The contents of universal housing and school violence are duplicated on first and second volume of text. The most presented safety education content in the 12 types of textbooks are proper sexual attitude, dietary problems, family conflict and food choice. The least common contents are dangerous drugs, family welfare, internet addiction and industrial accident compensation insurance. As this study is to analyze 12 textbooks developed in 2009 revision curriculum, it is necessary to compare it with the textbook written by the revised curriculum in 2015 and to clarify the contents system of safety education and to avoid duplication of contents. In addition, it is necessary to develop and distribute a safety education program that can support textbooks.

본 연구의 목적은 2009 개정 중학교 기술 가정 교과서의 '가정생활 영역'에서 안전교육 내용 분석을 통해 중학생에게 실질적인 도움이 되는 안전교육의 내용을 선정하고 개선하기 위한 기초자료를 제공하는데 있다. 분석대상은 2009개정 교육과정으로 12개 출판사에서 각각 집필된 중학교 교과서 12종 총 24권이다. 분석기준은 교육부(2015)에서 제시한 안전교육 7대 표준안을 바탕으로 안전교육 관련 선행연구를 참조하여 학자들의 검토를 토대로 하여 연구자가 개발하였다. 이러한 분석기준으로 각 교과서를 읽고 '안전'이라고 직접 언급한 단어, '심리적 안전'과 '행복한 삶'을 의미하는 단어, '주의', '유의', '안정'과 관련된 단어 등 안전교육 분석기준의 내용과 관련이 있는 단어들을 모두 추출한 후 가정교과서 단원에 따른 안전교육 내용을 분석틀로 하여 빈도와 퍼센트를 내는 내용분석법을 사용하였다. 교과서 분석결과, 안전교육 내용 쪽수는 기술 가정 교과서 12종의 총 쪽수 3412쪽 중 336.3쪽으로 9.8%로 나타났고 권별로 안전교육 관련 내용의 비중을 분석하여 보면, 1권의 경우 안전교육 내용 비중이 총 224.9쪽, 2권의 안전교육 내용 비중이 총 111.9쪽으로 학년이 올라갈수록 가정 교과서의 안전교육 비중이 낮아졌다. 안전교육 내용 가장 많은 단원은 '청소년의 자기관리' 단원으로 3개의 안전교육 영역을 포함하고 있었고 '청소년의 생활', '녹색생활의 실천' 단원 등과 같이 주로 실천과 체험, 실습이 강조되는 단원의 경우 '생활안전'영역의 안전교육 내용을 많이 다루고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 학생들이 가장 많이 당하는 안전사고와 관련 있는 가정 내 사고(1.4%), 실험 실습사고(0.3%)등에 대한 내용은 낮은 편으로 나타났고, 유니버설주거와 학교폭력 내용은 교과서 1권과 2권에 중복해서 제시되었다. 12종 교과서에서 가장 많이 다른 안전교육 내용은 바람직한 성태도, 식생활문제, 가족 갈등, 식품의 선택이며, 가장 적게 다룬 안전교육 내용은 유해약물, 가정 복지, 인터넷 중독, 산업재해보상보험 등이었다. 본 연구는 2009 개정 교육과정을 중심으로 개발된 교과서 12종을 분석하였기에 2015 개정 교육과정에 의해 집필된 교과서와의 비교를 통해 안전교육의 내용 체계를 분명히 하고 내용의 중복을 피할 수 있는 후속 연구가 필요하다. 또한, 교과서를 보조할 수 있는 안전교육 프로그램을 개발하여 보급할 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, M. M. & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.
  2. CDC(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) (2012). HECAT: Module S. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/pdf/ HECAT_Modules_S.pdf.
  3. Cho, M-G. (2007). A Study on the Improvement Options and Real Situation about Education of Experiment Class in Technical High School. Unpublished masterʼs thesis, In Ha University of Education, In-Cheon, Korea.
  4. Choi, S-B. (2004). Dictionary of Occupational Safety. Seoul: gold.
  5. Cox, S. & Cox. T. (1996). Safety, systems, and people. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  6. Doosan (2015). www.doopedia.co.kr 에서 2015. 2. 10. 검색
  7. Freda, B. (1995). Developing personal safety skills in children. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishing.
  8. KOSHA (2005). School Health and Safety Guidelines. http://www.kosha.or.kr 에서 2015.02.10. 검색
  9. Kim, D-H. (2004). The Safety Education and the Safety Guidance Measures in School. Korea Youth Research Association Conference.(pp.4-27)
  10. Kim, N-E. (2015). Development and Evaluation of Safety Theme-Based Home Economics Curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education Chung-Buk, Korea.
  11. Kim, S-J., Lee, J-E. & Song, M-K (2003). knowledge and attitude about injury prevention among elementary school children. Journal of The Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing, 9(4), 349-358.
  12. Kim, S-J. & Kim, S-H. (2009). Development of a safety education guideline book for teachers of elementary school students. Journal of The Korean academy of Child health Nursing, 15(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.4094/jkachn.2009.15.2.145
  13. Kim, T-H. (2000). A Study on the Contents Analysis of Safety Education in Elementary School : Focusing on Comparison with the Needs of Students. Unpublished masterʼs thesis, EWHA Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  14. Kim, H-W. & Lee, M-S (2002). A Study on the Development of the measuring Scale of Safety Conscioudness. Journal of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 199(1), 87-107.
  15. Kwak, E-B. (2004). A study of young children's safety awareness. The Journal the research institute of Korea Education, 14, 107-122.
  16. Lee, J-S. (1997). Psychological Perspectives on Safety: Behavior-Based Approach and Human Factors Approach. Journal of Psychological Science, 8(1), 39-63.
  17. Lee, Y-S, Chae, J-H, Yoo, T-M, Wang, S-S, Lee, E-H, Kim, H-N & Choi, M-J (2013). 2009 Revised Home Economics Curriculum in Relation to the Character Education. Journal of Home Economics Education Association, 25(2), 21-47.
  18. Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
  19. Ministry of Education. (2015). 7 safety Education standards.
  20. Pickle, B. (1989). Increasing safety awareness of preschoolers through a safety education program. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, Nova University, Florida.
  21. Scott, R. J. (1992). Preventing injury: A safety curriculum for preschool-kindergarten. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation, Albama University, California
  22. Son, H-H, Park, M-J & Chae, J_H (2009). A Content Analysis on Career Education in Home Economics Textbook of the Secondary School developed by the 7th Educational Process. Journal of Home Economics Education Association, 21(4), 45-58.
  23. Song, M-K, Lee, J-E, Moon, S-Y, Yang, S-J, Kim, S-J (2005). Contents Analysis of Textbook Related to Safety Education in Elementary School. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 16(2), 205-220.
  24. Yoo, T-M (2003). A Basic Study for The Development of secondary Home Economics Curriculum on Characteristics and Contents Structure of Home Economics, Literacy through Home Economics Education(I): A Delphi Study. Family and Environment Research, 41(10), 149.
  25. Yoo, H-J. (2008). A Study for Securing the Safety Right : Focused on the Criterion of the Acceptable Risk Level for Disadvantaged Class. Journal of Safety and Crisis Management, 4(2), 17-31.

Cited by

  1. 2015년 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 기술·가정 교과서의 의생활 영역 분석 vol.30, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.15
  2. 중학교 가정(기술·가정)교과 식생활 영역의 핵심 교육내용 분석 - 제1차 교육과정부터 2009개정 교육과정의 교과서 내용을 중심으로 - vol.30, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.12.30.4.93
  3. ARCS 동기유발 전략을 적용한 식품 안전 교육 교수·학습 과정안 개발 vol.31, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.09.31.3.135
  4. 중학생의 식품 섭취 교육방향 탐색을 위한 가정 교과서 및 2007~2015 국민건강영양조사의 식품 섭취 변화 추이 분석 vol.31, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.09.31.3.179