DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고성능 PRO 모듈 개발 및 운전조건이 모듈 성능에 미치는 영향

The development of high-performance PRO module and effects of operating condition on the performance of PRO module

  • 한만재 (도레이케미칼(주) 기술연구소) ;
  • 심연주 (도레이케미칼(주) 기술연구소) ;
  • 이종화 (도레이케미칼(주) 기술연구소)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.23
  • 심사 : 2017.08.02
  • 발행 : 2017.08.29

초록

Pressure retarded osmosis(PRO) has attracted much attention as potential technology to reduce the overall energy consumption for reverse osmosis(RO) desalination. The RO/PRO hybrid process is considered as the most logical next step for future desalination. The PRO process aims to harness the osmotic energy difference of two aqueous solutions separated by a semipermeable membrane. By using the concentrated water(RO brine) discharged from existing RO plants, the PRO process can effectively exploit a greater salinity gradient to reduce the energy cost of processing concentrated water. However, in order to use RO brine as the draw solution, PRO membrane must have high water flux and enough mechanical strength to withstand the high operational pressure. This study investigates the development of a thin film composite PRO membrane and spiral wound module for high power density. Also, the influence of membrane backing layer on the overall power density was studied using the characteristic factors of PRO membranes. Finally, the performance test of an 8-inch spiral wound module was carried out under various operating conditions(i.e. hydraulic pressure, flow rate, temperature). As the flow rate and temperature increased under the same hydraulic pressure, the PRO performance increased due to the growth of water permeability coefficient and osmotic pressure. For a high performance PRO system, in order to optimize the operating conditions, it is highly recommended that the flow pressure be minimized while the flow rate is maintained at a high level.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A. Achilli, J.L. Prante, N.T. Hancock, E.B. Maxwell, A.E. Childress, (2014), Experimental results from RO-PRO: a next generation system for low-energy desalination, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 6437-6443. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405556s
  2. A. Achilli, T.Y. Cath, A.E. Childress, (2009), Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: an experimental and theoretical investigation, J. Membr. Sci., 343, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.07.006
  3. A.K. Ghosh, E.M.V. Hoek, (2009), Impacts of support membrane structure and chemistry on polyamide-polysulfone interfacial composite membrnaes, J. Membr. Sci., 336, 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.024
  4. A.R. Da Costa, A.G. Fane, D.E. Wiley, (1994), Spacer characterization and pressure drop modelling in spacer-filled channels for ultrafiltration, J. Membr. Sci., 87, 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)E0076-P
  5. A. Tiraferri, N.Y. Yip, W.A. Phillip, J.D. Schiffman, M. Elimelech, (2011), Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and structure, J. Membr. Sci., 367, 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.014
  6. C.P. Koutsou, S.G. Yiantsios, A.J. Karabelas, (2009), A numerical and experimental study of mass transfer in spacer-filled channels: effects of spacer geometrical characteristics and Schmidt munber, J. Membr. Sci., 326, 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.007
  7. G.T. Gray, J.R. McCutcheon, M. Elimelech, (2006), Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 284, 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049
  8. J. Bartram, (2008), Improving on haves and have-nots, Nature, 452, 283-284. https://doi.org/10.1038/452283a
  9. J.L. Prante, J.A. Ruskowitz, A.E. Childress, A. Achilli, (2014), An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination, Appl. Energy, 120, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.013
  10. J.R. McCutcheon, M. Elimelech, (2006), Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis, J. Membr. SCI., 284, 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.07.049
  11. K.L. Lee, R.W. Baker, H.K. Lonsdale, (1981), Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 8, 141-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)82088-8
  12. M. Mulder, (1996), Basic principles of membrane technology, Kluver Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  13. N.Y Yip, M. Elimelech, (2011), Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 10273-10282. https://doi.org/10.1021/es203197e
  14. Q. She, D. Hou, J. Liu, K.H. Tan, C.Y. Tang, (2013), Effect of feed spacer induced membrane deformation on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis(PRO): implications for PRO process operation, J. Membr. Sci., 445, 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.05.061
  15. Q. She, Xue Jin, C.Y. Tang, (2012), Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion, J. Membr. Sci., 401-402, 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.02.014
  16. Schwinge, J. Neal, P.R. Wiley, D.E. Fletcher, D.F. Fane, A. G., (2004), Spiral wound modules and spacers: Review and analysis. J. Membr. Sci., 242, 129-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2003.09.031
  17. Saito K, Irie M, Zaitsu S, Sakai H, Hayashi H, Tanioka A, (2012), Power generation with salinity gradient by pressure retarded osmosis using concentrated brine from SWRO system and treated sewage as pure water, Desalin Water Treat, 41, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.664696
  18. S. Loeb, L. Titelman, E. Korngold, J. Freiman, (1997), Effect of porous surpport fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane, J. Membr. Sci.,129, 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(96)00354-7
  19. T. Thorsen, T. Holt, (2009), The potential for power production from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 335, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.003
  20. W.A. Phillip, J.S. Yong, M. Elimelech, (2010), Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis; modeling and experiments environ, Sci. Technol., 44, 5170-5176. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100901n
  21. Y.C. Kim, M. Elimelech, (2012), Adverse impact of feed channel spacers on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 4673-4681. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3002597
  22. Y. Xu, X. Peng, C.Y. Tang, Q.S. Fu, S. Nie, (2010), Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module, J. Membr. Sci., 348, 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.013