DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simulation of Interaction Forces between Two Ships Considering Ship's Dimension

선박의 크기를 고려한 두 선박의 간섭력에 관한 시뮬레이션

  • Received : 2017.06.07
  • Accepted : 2017.07.25
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

This paper analyzed the motion characteristics of two ships according to the ship's dimension using Ship Handling Simulator. When the panamax container ship passes the smaller ship, peak point and patterns of interaction forces for the moored ship are noticeable. Accordingly, special attention should be paid to the movements of moored ship because surge force and yaw moment changes in the opposite direction before and after condition of ship's beam. However, when the container ship passes the larger moored ship in reverse, peak point stood out on the passing ship at the beginning of ship-to-ship interaction and attraction force on the passing ship occurred steadily during 1L(length overall of passing ship) interval at a point of beam. In addition, as the lateral distance between the hull of two ships decreases less than 2B(breadth of passing ship), interaction forces on the passing ship at the beginning are sharply increase.

본 연구에서는 선박조종시뮬레이터를 이용하여 선박의 크기에 따른 두 선박의 간섭력의 운동특성을 분석하였다. 파나막스급 컨테이너선이 자선보다 크기가 작은 계류선을 근접통항하는 경우에 계류선에서 간섭력의 피크점과 운동패턴의 변화가 뚜렷하게 나타났다. 이땐 선박의 정횡 상태 전후에서 전후력과 회두모멘트가 반대방향으로 바뀌므로 계류선의 움직임에 각별한 주의가 요구된다. 반대로 파나막스급 컨테이너선이 자선보다 큰 계류선을 통과하는 경우에는 근접상황이 발생하는 초기에 통과선에서 간섭력의 피크점이 나타났고, 통과선에는 정횡 이후 약 1L(통과선의 전장)의 구간동안 지속적으로 흡인력이 발생했다. 또한, 통과선과 계류선의 선체간의 수평거리가 2B(통과선의 폭)이하로 줄어들면, 통과선의 초기에 발생하는 간섭력이 급격히 증대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kijima, K. and H. Yasukawa (1984) "Manoeuvrability of ships in narrow waterway", Journal of the Society of Naval Architects, 156, 171-179.
  2. Lee, C.K. (2011) "Hydrodynamic interaction effects vessels in confined waters", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 35(10), 799-804. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2011.35.10.799
  3. Lee, C.K. and S.B. Moon (2014) "A study on the minimum safe distance between two vessels in confined water", Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 38(6), 561-565. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2014.38.6.561
  4. Lee, S.D. (2017) "A study on the distance of safe passing considering ship to ship interaction", Doctoral Dissertation, Korea Maritime and Ocean University.
  5. Lindberg, O., H.B., Bingham, A.P., Engsig-Karup and P.A. Madsen (2012) "Towards real time simulation of ship-ship interaction", Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies(IWWWFB 2012), Copenhagen, Denmark.
  6. Ozersky, A. and E., Rogozhina (2016) "Shallow water and interaction effects in ECDIS real-time motion prediction", Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, Hamburg, Germany, 186-196.
  7. Pinkster, J.A. (2004) "The influence of a free surface on passing ship", International Shipbuilding Progress, 51(4), 313-338.
  8. Pinkster, J.A. (2016) "Progress on real-time prediction of ship-ship-shore interactions based on potential flow", Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water, Hamburg, Germany, 157-167.
  9. Remery, G.F.M. (1974) "Mooring forces induced by passing ships", Proceedings of the 6th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, USA, 349-363.
  10. Schellhammer, V. (2014) Collision between the CMV CONMAR AVENUE and CMV MAERSK KALMAR on 7 May 2013 on the Outer Weser, Federal Bureau of Maritime Casualty Investigation (BSU), Hamburg, 6-42.
  11. Son, K.H. (2014), Motion and Manoeuvrability of Marine Vehicles, Dasom Press, 1-169.
  12. Vantorre, M., E. Verzhbitskaya and E. Laforce (2002) "Model test based formulations of ship-ship interaction forces", Ship Technology Research, 49, 124-141.
  13. Varyani, K.S. and M. Vantorre (2006) "New generic equation for interaction effects on a moored container ship due to a passing tanker", Journal of Ship Research, 50(3), 278-287.
  14. Yasukawa H. (2003) "Maneuvering motions of two ships in close proximity", Transactions of the West- Japan Society of Naval Architects, 105, 43-54.