DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Use of Real-Time PCR and Internal Standard Addition Method for Identifying Mixed Ratio of Chicken Meat in Sausages

Real-Time PCR과 Internal Standard Addition법을 이용한 돼지고기 소시지에 혼합된 닭고기의 정량

  • Lee, Namrye (Combat Material Center, Defence Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Joo, Jae-Young (Combat Material Center, Defence Agency for Technology and Quality) ;
  • Yeo, Yong-Heon (Combat Material Center, Defence Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • Received : 2017.03.17
  • Accepted : 2017.08.14
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

This study examined how much chicken meat was in sausage made with pork. Both real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and internal standard addition were used. Fifty ng of chicken DNA was added to the sausages as an internal standard. The addition of standard DNA increased the amplification efficiency of PCR and confirmed the possibility of quantitative analysis. A QIAamp DNA Micro Kit was used to improve the DNA recovery and amplification efficiency. The density of template DNA and primer were suitable for $3.0{\sim}5.0{\mu}L$ and $0.5{\mu}L$, respectively. Each DNA of pig and chicken was diluted in 10-fold from steps 50 ng to 0.05 ng. The detection limit of both pig and chicken meat was more than 0.05 ng and the correlation coefficient of the standard curve was at least 0.98. The result of the quantitative analysis after heat treatment of 3 samples of pigs and chickens mixed at 70:30 showed a 5.7% difference (64.3:35.7) between the expected value and measured value. The quantitative value was changed by affecting the DNA according to the heat treatment ($70^{\circ}C$, 10 min). An analysis of the pork and chicken content in sausages showed that it was difficult to detect chicken meat and the quantitative value of DNA according to the Ct value was very low. On the other hand, when adding standard material (50 ng of chicken DNA) to the sausages, the Ct value decreased gradually with increasing chicken mixing ratio. Thus, the mixing ratio of chicken in sausages could be estimated.

본 연구는 돼지고기로 제조된 소시지에 저가원료인 닭고기 혼합비율을 정량하기 위해 real-time PCR 법과 소량 함유된 닭의 정량의 정확도를 높이기 위해 닭의 내부 표준물질을 첨가하는 방법을 적용함으로써 소시지의 진위판별 가능성을 제시하였다. DNA 회수율과 PCR 증폭효율을 높이기 위해 QIAamp DNA Micro Kit을 사용하였고, 최종 PCR 반응액 $20{\mu}L$에 template DNA($5{\sim}10ng/{\mu}L$)는 $3.0{\sim}5.0{\mu}L$, primer 농도는 $0.5{\mu}L(10pmol)$, $2{\times}$ Cybrgreen buffer는 $10{\mu}L$로 조정하였을 때 가장 적합하였고, PCR 증폭조건은 annealing 온도를 $62^{\circ}C$, extension 온도를 $68^{\circ}C$, final extension 시간은 33초, 최종 PCR cycle은 40 cycle로 했을 때 가장 PCR 증폭효율이 좋은 것으로 평가되었다. 돼지와 닭의 DNA를 50 ng에서 0.05 ng으로 순차적으로 10배씩 희석한 template DNA를 이용해 민감도(최소 검출한계)를 확인한 결과 돼지와 닭 모두 0.05 ng 이상으로 각각 확인되었다. 표준곡선의 결정계수($R^2$)도 모두 0.995 이상으로 표준곡선의 linearity가 정량에 적합한 것으로 확인되었다. 돼지고기와 닭고기를 각각 70:30 비율로 혼합한 3점의 시료를 $70^{\circ}C$에서 10분간 열처리한 후 정량분석을 실시하여 기대치에 의한 측정치를 비교한 결과, 64.3:35.7의 비율로써 평균 5.7%의 차이를 나타내 생육(raw meat) 또는 가열처리된 시료의 상태에 따라 DNA에 영향을 주어 PCR 증폭효율 및 DNA 정량 값에 일부 영향을 주는 것으로 판단되었다. 소시지에 함유된 돼지고기와 닭고기의 함량을 분석한 결과 돼지고기에 비해 닭고기 함량이 적은 소시지에서는 닭고기(6%, 12%, 25%, 38%)의 검출이 어려웠고, Ct(threshold cycle) 값에 따른 DNA 정량값이 매우 낮아 배합비율을 환산이 어려웠다. 그러나 소시지에 닭의 표준물질 DNA(50 ng)를 첨가함으로써 배합비율이 증가할수록 Ct값도 점차 낮아져서 배합비율을 반영하고 있음에 따라 Ct값의 평균치${\pm}$오차범위 값으로 간접적으로 배합비율을 추정할 수 있을 것으로 생각되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Heo SE. 2008. Study on the dining space and a meal culture according to the change of residing form. MS Thesis. Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
  2. Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs. 2014. http://www.mafra.go.kr/list.jsp?&newsid=155445233§ion_id=b_sec_1&pageNo=8&year=2017&listcnt=10&board_kind=C&board_skin_id=C3&depth=1&division=B&group_id=3&menu_id=1125&reference=&parent_code=3&popup_yn=&tab_yn=N (accessed Jan 2014).
  3. Bustin SA. 2000. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol 25: 169-193. https://doi.org/10.1677/jme.0.0250169
  4. Pineiro M, Pereira MM, Rocha GA, Arnaut LG, Formosinho SJ. 2000. Singlet oxygen quantum yields from halogenated chlorins: Potential new photodynamic therapy agents. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 138: 147-157.
  5. Ataman B, Ashley J, Gorczyca D, Gorczyca M, Mathew D, Wichmann C, Sigrist SJ, Budnik V. 2006. Nuclear trafficking of Drosophila Frizzled-2 during synapse development requires the PDZ protein dGRIP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 7841-7846. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600387103
  6. Vage DI, Klungland H, Lu D, Cone RD. 1999. Molecular and pharmacological characterization of dominant black coat color in sheep. Mamm Genome 10: 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900939
  7. Ochiai A, Mori S, Kawai S, Murata K. 2015. Overexpression, purification, and characterization of ATP-NAD kinase of Sphingomonas sp. A1. Protein Expr Purif 36: 124-130.
  8. Christopoulou E, Lazaraki M, Komaitis M, Kaselimis K. 2004. Effectiveness of determinations of fatty acids and triglycerides for the detection of adulteration of olive with vegetable oils. Food Chem 84: 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00273-5
  9. Aparicio R, Aparicio-Ruiz R. 2000. Authentication of vegetable oils by chromatographic techniques. J Chromatogr A 881: 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00355-1
  10. Park JK, Shin KH, Shin SC, Chung KY, Chung ER. 2007. Identification of meat species using species-specific PCRRFLP fingerprint of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 27: 209-215. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.2.209
  11. Montiel-Sosa JF, Ruiz-Pesini E, Montoya J, Roncales P, Lopez-Perez MJ, Perez-Martos A. 2000. Direct and highly species-specific detection of pork meat and fat in meat products by PCR amplification of mitochondrial DNA. J Agric Food Chem 48: 2829-2832. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9907438
  12. Chung ER, Kim WT, Kim YS, Han SK. 2000. Identification of Hanwoo meat using PCR-RFLP marker of MC1R gene associated with bovine coat color. J Anim Sci Technol 42: 379-390.
  13. Koh BRD, Kim YH, Park SD, Na HM, Kim JN, Sung CM, Lee SS. 2005. Identification of MC1R gene variants of Hanwoo and Holstein meat using PCR-RFLP. Korean J Vet Serv 28: 259-265.
  14. Park YC, Lim JY, Kim MR, Park YE, Lim JD, Hwang CR, Kim KH, Lee JH, Cho TY, Lee HJ, Lee SJ, Han SB. 2012. Identification of faulty red pepper powder containing seasoned red-pepper sauce. J Fd Hyg Safety 27: 182-187. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2012.27.2.182
  15. Kim HS, Seo YB, Choi SS, Kim J, Shin J, Yang JY, Kim GD. 2015. Development and validation of multiplex polymerase chain reaction to determine squid species based on 16s rRNA gene. J Fd Hyg Safety 30: 43-50. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2015.30.1.43
  16. Her EJ, Ko EK, Seo KH, Kim YJ, Park HJ, Wee SH, Moon JS. 2014. Validation of PCR and ELISA test kits for identification of domestic animal species in raw meat and meat products in Korea. J Fd Hys Safety 28: 158-153.
  17. Ilhak OL, Arslan A. 2007. Identification of meat species by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 31: 159-163.
  18. Kesmen Z, Gulluce A, Sahin F, Yetim H. 2009. Identification of meat species by TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay. Meat Sci 82: 444-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.02.019
  19. Yang L, Tan Z, Wang D, Xue L, Guan MX, Huang T, Li R. 2013. Species identification through mitochondrial rRNA genetic analysis. Sci Rep 4: 4089.
  20. Teletchea F, Maudet C, Hanni C. 2005. Food and forensic molecular identification: update and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 23: 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.05.006
  21. Park YC, Ahn CY, Jin SO, Lim JY, Kim KH, Lee JH, Cho TY, Lee HJ, Park KS, Yoon HS. 2012. Identification of raw materials in processed meat products by PCR using species-specific primer. J Fd Hyg Safety 27: 68-73. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2012.27.1.068
  22. Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R. 1993. Kinetic PCR analysis: real-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Biotechnology 11: 1026-1030.
  23. Bottero MT, Dalmasso A. 2011. Animal species identification in food products: evolution of biomolecular methods. Vet J 190: 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.09.024
  24. Krcmar P, Rencova E. 2005. Quantitative detection of species-specific DNA in feedstuffs and fish meals. J Food Prot 68: 1217-1221. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-68.6.1217
  25. Yancy HF, Washington JD, Callahan L, Mason JA, Deaver CM, Farrell DE, Ha T, Sespico E, Falmlen D, Myers MJ. 2009. Development, evaluation, and peer verification of a rapid real-time PCR method for the detection of animal material. J Food Prot 72: 2368-2374. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.11.2368
  26. Pegels N, Gonzalez I, Lopez-Calleja I, Fernandez S, Garcia T, Martin R. 2012. Evaluation of a TaqMan real-time PCR assay for detection of chicken, turkey, duck, and goose material in highly processed industrial feed samples. Poult Sci 91: 1709-1719. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01954
  27. Kesmen Z, Yetiman AE, Sahin F, Yetim H. 2012. Detection of chicken and turkey meat in meat mixtures by using real-time PCR assays. J Food Sci 77: C167-C173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02536.x
  28. Okuma TA, Hellberg RS. 2015. Identification of meat species in pet foods using a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. Food Control 50: 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.08.017
  29. Kim KH, Kim YS, Kim MR, Lee HY, Jung YK, Lee JH, Chang HS, Park YC, Kim SY, Choi JD, Jang YM. 2014. Development of species-specific primer to determine the authenticity of vegetable raw materials in food. Food Eng Prog 18: 419-426. https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2014.18.4.419
  30. Drummond MG, Brasii BSAF, Dalsecco LS, Brasil RSAF, Teixeira LV, Oliveira DAA. 2013. A versatile real-time PCR method to quantify bovine contamination in buffalo products. Food Control 29: 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.051
  31. Nesvadbova M, Knoll A, Vastkova A. 2010. Selection of the most suitable method for the extraction of DNA from foods and feeds for species identification. Acta Univ Agric Silvic Mendelianae Brun 58: 169-174. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201058020169
  32. Lee HH, Song HS, Kim JH, Lee WY, Lee SH, Park SH, Park HK, Kim HY. 2005. Comparison of the efficiency from raw and processed corns by five different DNA extraction methods. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 48: 331-334.
  33. Lee JH, Song KY, Hyeon JY, Hwang IG, Kwak HS, Han JA, Chung YH, Seo KH. 2010. Comparison of standard culture method and real-time PCR assay for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in processed and unprocessed foods. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 30: 410-418. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.3.410
  34. Lee SY, Jang KI, Woo GJ, Kwak HS, Kim KY. 2007. Development of protocol for the effective detection of feline calicivirus as norovirus surrogate in oyster and lettuce. Korean J Food Sci Technol 39: 71-76.
  35. Park YC, Kim MR, Lim JY, Park YE, Shin JH, Hwang CR, Lim JD, Kim KH, Lee JH, Cho TY, Lee HJ, Han SB. 2012. A comparison of gene extraction methods for the identification of raw materials from processed meat products. J Fd Hyg Safety 27: 146-151. https://doi.org/10.13103/JFHS.2012.27.2.146
  36. Sakalar E, Abasiyanik MF, Bektik E, Tayyrov A. 2012. Effect of heat processing on DNA quantification of meat species. J Food Sci 77: N40-N44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02853.x
  37. Shin WS. 2003. Development of analytical method for genetically modified maize from processed food. Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong, Korea.
  38. Ha SJ. 2013. Rapid detection of clostridium difficile by real-time PCR and whole genome amplification (WGA). MS Thesis. Kookmin University, Seoul, Korea.