한국환경생태학회지 (Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology)

  • 제31권5호
  • /
  • Pages.433-443
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-3857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-131X(eISSN)
한국환경생태학회 (Korean Society of Environment and Ecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

식물사회학적 식생자료의 종조성 균질성에 대하여

On the Homotoneity of Species Composition in the Phytosociologically Synthesized Community Tables

  • 김종원 (계명대학교 생명과학과) ;
  • 엄병철 (계명대학교 대학원 생물학과)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.18
  • 심사 : 2017.09.07
  • 발행 : 2017.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

식생자료의 종조성적 온전성(전형성과 대표성) 확보는 Z.-M. 학파의 정제된 식생자료(phytosociological $relev\acute{e}$)와 식물군락(plant community)을 이용하는 국가식생자원에 대한 통합적 관리의 주요 선행 과정이다. 본 연구의 목적은 특정 단위식생으로 모둠화된 식생자료의 종조성 균질성에 대한 질적 양적 평가 도구를 개발하는 것이다. 식생자료의 이질적 요소가 적용된 새로운 균질도, 현존균질도(actual homotoneity: $H_{act}$)와 최적균질도(optimal homotoneity: $H_{opt}$)를 제안하였다. 사례 식생형에서 식물상 변수들, 새로 개발한 균질도, 선행연구의 유사 균질도(Pfeiffer's homogeneity, basic homotoneity-coefficient, corrected homotoneity-coefficient, mean floristic similarity)와의 상관관계는 Spearman 순위 상관계수(Spearman's rank correlation coefficient)로 분석되었다. 현존균질도와 최적균질도는 각각 식생자료 간과 단위식생 간의 식물상 균질성 차이를 더욱 분명하게 드러내었다. 식생자료수로부터 가장 독립적인 균질도는 현존균질도였다. 오랜 교란 역사를 지닌 한반도의 현존식생 조건에서 최적균질도는 현존균질도에 대한 더욱 정교한 해석이 가능한 보완적 수단이 되었다. 현존균질도와 최적균질도는 국가 식생자원에 대한 일관성과 객관성을 포함하는 식생자료의 DB 구축을 위한 균질한 식생자료 선별에 기여할 것으로 기대되었다.

Securing the species compositional integrity (typicalness and representativeness) is the essential prerequisite for an integrated management of vegetation resources using the phytosociological $relev\acute{e}s$ and plant communities of the Z.-M. school. This study is intended to develop a tool for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of species compositional homotoneity of a set of $relev\acute{e}s$ per syntaxon. The new homotoneities, actual homotoneity ($H_{act}$), and optimal homotoneity ($H_{opt}$) taking into account the heterogeneous factors of $relev\acute{e}s$ are proposed. The correlations between the floristic variables such as the vegetation type, the new homotoneities, and the previously studied homogeneous measures (e.g. Pfeiffer's homogeneity, basic homotoneity-coefficient, corrected homotoneity-coefficient, and mean floristic similarity) are analyzed by using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. $H_{act}$ and $H_{opt}$ are effective in determining the difference of inter-synthesized units and of inter-$relev\acute{e}s$, respectively. $H_{act}$ is the homotoneity that is the most independent of the number of $relev\acute{e}s$. On actual vegetation with long-term human impact in the Korean Peninsula, $H_{opt}$ has become an aid to the more precise understanding of $H_{act}$ as substantive homogeneousness of species composition of syntaxa. It is expected that $H_{act}$ and $H_{opt}$ can be used for the selection of a sort of homogeneous vegetation data to build a phytosociological $relev\acute{e}$-database with consistency and objectiveness for national vegetation resources.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barkman, J.J., J. Moravec, and S. Rauschert(1973) Code of phytosociological nomenclature. Vegetatio 32(3): 131-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02095917
  2. Becking, R.W.(1957) The Zurich-Montpellier school of phytosociology. Botanical Review 23(7): 411-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02872328
  3. Braun-Blanquet, J.(1965) Plant Sociology: The Study of Plant Communities(1st ed.), G.D. Fuller and H.S. Conard, trans. Hafner, New York, 439pp.
  4. Ceska, A.(1966) Estimation of the mean floristic similarity between and within sets of vegetational releves. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 1(3): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852438
  5. Choi, B.G.(2007) Vegetation of Ulleungdo, Korea. M.S. Thesis, Keimyung Univ., Daegu, 110pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Dahl, E.(1960) Some measures of uniformity in vegetation analysis. Ecology 41(4): 805-808. https://doi.org/10.2307/1931822
  7. Eom, B.C.(2010) Plant species composition and distributional peculiarity of wild tea (Thea sinensis L.) population in Korean peninsula. M.S. Thesis, Keimyung Univ., Daegu, 75pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Goodall, D.W. and E. Feoli(1988). Application of probabilistic methods in the analysis of phytosociological data. Coenoses 3(1): 1-10.
  9. Grabherr, G., G. Koch, H. Kirchmeier, and K. Reiter(1998) Hemerobie Osterreichischer Waldokosysteme. Universitatsverlag Wagner, Innsbruck, 493pp. (in German)
  10. Jung, Y.K. and J.W. Kim(1998) Syntaxonomy of mantle communities in South Korea. Korean Journal of Ecology 21(6): 739-750.
  11. Kim, C.H., J.H. Kang, and M.J. Kim(2013) Status and development of national ecosystem survey in Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 22(6): 725-738. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2013.22.6.725
  12. Kim, J.W.(1992) Vegetation of Northeast Asia: On the syntaxonomy and syngeography of the Oak and Beech forests. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Vienna, Vienna, 314pp.
  13. Kim, J.W.(2006) Vegetation Ecology(2nd ed.). World Science, Seoul, 340pp. (in Korean)
  14. Kim, J.W., B.K. Choi, T.B. Ryu, and G.Y. Lee(2012). Application and assessment of national vegetation naturalness. In: National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), The 4th Nature-Environment Survey Guidelines, NIER, Seoul, pp. 81-172. (in Korean)
  15. Kim, J.W. and Y.K. Lee(2006) Classification and Assessment of Plant Communities. World Science, Seoul, 240pp. (in Korean)
  16. Lee, Y.K. and S.Y. Kim(2012) Vegetation on Nakdong river estuary. In: National wetlands center (NWC), Intersive Survey on the Wetland Pretected Areas, NWC, Changnyeong, pp. 59-90. (in Korean)
  17. Lim, J.C.(2012) A Phytosociological Study of the Maeul-Soop in Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Keimyung Univ., Daegu, 227pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Lomax, R.G. and D.L. Hahs-Vaughn(2013) An Introduction to Statistical Concepts(3rd ed.). Routledge, New York, Hove, 822pp.
  19. McCleery, R.H., T.A. Watt, and T. Hart(2007) Introduction to Statistics for Biology(3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London, New York, 273pp.
  20. Moravec, J.(1971) A simple method for estimating homotoneity of sets of phytosociological releves. Folia Geobotanica 6(2): 147-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02851759
  21. Moravec, J.(1989) Influences of the individualistic concept of vegetation on syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81(1/2): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045511
  22. Mucina, L. and E. van der Marrel(1989) Twenty years of numerical syntaxonomy. Vegetatio 81(1/2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00045509
  23. Neuhausl, R.(1977) Delimitation and ranking of floristic-sociological units on the basis of releve similarity. Vegetatio 35(2): 115-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097221
  24. Pfeiffer, H.H.(1957) Betrachtungen zum Homogenitiitsproblem in der Pflanzensoziologie. Mitteilungen Der Floristisch-Soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft 6/7: 103-111. (in German)
  25. Ryu, T.B.(2015) Vegetation on Limestone in South Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Keimyung Univ., Daegu, 160pp. (in Korean with English abstract)
  26. Spearman, C.(1904) The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. The American Journal of Psychology 15(1): 72-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
  27. Tuxen, R.(1970) Einige Bestandes- und Typenmerkmale in der Struktur der Pflanzengesellschaften. In: R. Tuxen(ed.), Gesellschaftsmorphologie (Strukturforschung), Dr. W. Junk, Den Haag, pp. 76-98. (in German)
  28. Weber, H.E., J. Moravec, and J.P. Theurillat(2000) International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature(3rd ed.). Journal of Vegetation 1: 739-768.
  29. Westhoff, V. and E. van der Maarel(1978) The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: R.H. Whittaker(ed.), Classfication of Plant Communities, Dr. W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 287-399.