Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Valuing Traffic Noise Cost Based on the Damage Cost Approach

피해비용 접근법을 바탕으로 한 소음비용 추정 연구

  • JUNG, Dongjae (Department of Environmental Planning, Seoul National University) ;
  • CHANG, Justin S. (Department of Environmental Planning, Seoul National University)
  • 정동재 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경계획학과) ;
  • 장수은 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경계획학과)
  • Received : 2017.03.30
  • Accepted : 2017.07.12
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Traffic noise cost can be assessed either by the damage cost approach or by the avoidance cost method. This paper provides an overview of pertinent studies of these two approaches and shows that the damage cost approach is more universal and reliable than the avoidance cost counterpart. This study then investigated three sub-components to address the damage cost framework. First of all, unit value per person exposed to noise per year was calculated. Secondly, the area exposed to noise was determined using noise prediction equation. Thirdly, the number of people affected by noise was computed by multiplying the number of people exposed to noise with the percentage of people affected by noise. This paper also suggested a simplified equation that represents the relationship between damage costs and noise levels. Finally, the benefits of noise reduction derived from the damage cost method and those from the avoidance cost approach were compared and discussed.

교통 소음비용은 피해비용 접근법 또는 회피비용 접근법으로 평가할 수 있다. 본 연구는 피해비용 접근법을 바탕으로 소음의 외부비용을 산정하는 방안을 제시하였다. 이를 위하여 네 가지를 검토하였다. 첫째, 한국의 실정에 맞는 소음피해 비용 원단위 41,737-601,910 원/(인 년)를 도출하였다. 둘째, 소음도 예측식을 이용하여 소음 영향권을 설정하였다. 셋째, 소음 영향권 내에서 소음에 노출된 인구와 실제 피해인구 비율의 곱으로 소음피해 인구를 추산하였다. 마지막으로 소음의 피해비용을 산출하는 과정을 간소하게 하는 소음 피해비용과 소음도간 관계식을 제시하였다. 이를 바탕으로 피해비용 접근법과 회피비용 접근법으로 소음저감 편익을 산출하고 비교함으로써 피해비용 접근법이 회피비용 접근법보다 이론적 정합성과 정책적 신뢰성이 높은 방법론임을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn S., Rho P. (2007), Estimating Wetland Values Using Meta-regression Benefit Transfer Method in Korea, Korea Environment Institute, Sejong, Korea. (In Korean)
  2. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Lake I. (2004), The Valuation of Transport-Related Noise in Birmingham, Technical Report to the Department for Transport, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
  3. Bickel P., Friedrich R., Burgess A., Fagiani P., Hunt A., De Jong G. et al. (2006), Developing Harmonised European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assesment (HEATCO), Deliverable D5: Proposal for Harmonised Guidelines, IER, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  4. Bickel P., Schmid S., Tervonen J., Hamekoski K., Otterstrom T., Anton P. et al. (2003), Environmental Marginal Cost Case Studies, UNITE Deliverable 11, IER, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
  5. Birn K., Bolik H., Rieken P. (2005), Macroeconomic Evaluation Methodology: Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003, Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing, Berlin, Germany.
  6. Chang J., Kim D. (2013), Hedonic Estimates of Rail Noise in Seoul, Transport. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ., 19, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.11.002
  7. European Commission (2002), Position Paper on Dose Response Relationships Between Transportation Noise and Annoyance, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
  8. HSEA W. (2003), Valuation of Noise: Position Paper, Working Group on Health and Socio-Economic Aspects, Brussels, Belgium.
  9. Kang D. (1997a), Railroad Noise and its Impact, Trans. Korean Soc. Noise Vib. Eng., 7(5), 827-836. (In Korean)
  10. Kang D. (1997b), Prediction of Railroad Noise, Trans. Korean Soc. Noise Vib. Eng., 7(6), 1001-1006. (In Korean)
  11. Korea Development Institute (KDI) (2008), A Study on Standard Guidelines for Pre-feasibility Study on Road and Railway projects (5th ed.), Korea Development Institute, Sejong, Korea. (In Korean)
  12. Korzhenevych A., Dehnen N., Brocker J., Holtkamp M., Meier H., Gibson G. et al. (2014), Update of the Handbook on External Costs of Transport, European Commission DG Mobility and Transport, Brussels, Belgium.
  13. Maibach M., Schreyer C., Sutter D., van Essen H., Boon B., Smokers R. et al. (2008), Handbook on Estimation of External Costs in the Transport Sector: Internalisation Measures and Policies for All external Cost of Transport (IMPACT), CE Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
  14. Mankiw N. G. (2011), Principles of Economics, Cengage Learning.
  15. MOLIT (2012), Road Design Handbook (도로설계편람), Sejong, Korea. (In Korean)
  16. MOLIT (Korea Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) (2013), National Guidance on Transport Appraisal (5th ed.) (교통시설 투자평가지침 제5판), Sejong, Korea. (In Korean)
  17. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER) (1987), A Study on the Comprehensive Counterplan for the Reduction of Traffic Noise (1), National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon, Korea.
  18. Navrud S. (2002), The State-of-the-Art on Economic Valuation of Noise, Report prepared for the European Commission, European Commission DG Environment, Brussels, Belgium.
  19. Schreyer C., Schneider C., Maibach M., Rothengatter W., Doll C., Schmedding D. (2004), External Costs of Transport: Update Study, INFRAS, Swiss.
  20. UK Department for Transport (DfT) (2014), TAG UNIT A3: Environmental Impact Appraisal, UK DfT, London, United Kingdom.
  21. UK Highways Agency (HA) (2011), Design Manual for Roads and Bridges, Environmental Impact Assessment (DMRB), Volume 11, Section 3, Part 7, HA.
  22. van Essen H., Schroten A., Otten M., Sutter D., Schreyer C., Zandonella R. et al. (2011), External Costs of Transport in Europe: Update Study for 2008, CE Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
  23. Watkiss P., Anthoff D., Downing T., Hepburn C., Hope C., Hunt A. et al. (2005), The Social Cost of Carbon (SCC) Review - Methodological Approaches for Using SCC Estimates in Policy Assessment, UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, United Kingdom.

Cited by

  1. 생분해 어구 보급 확대에 따른 경제적 효과 분석 vol.55, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3796/ksfot.2019.55.4.372