DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modified Fisher method for unilateral cleft lip-report of cases

  • Kim, Hui Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Joonhyoung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chang, Ming-Chih (Sijhih Cathay General Hospital) ;
  • Song, In Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Anam Hospital, Korea University) ;
  • Seo, Byoung Moo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.01.31
  • Accepted : 2017.03.24
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Background: Rehabilitation of normal function and form is essential in cleft lip repair. In 2005, Dr. David M. Fisher introduced an innovative method, named "an anatomical subunit approximation technique" in unilateral cleft lip repair. According to this method, circumferential incision along the columella on cleft side of the medial flap is continued to the planned top of the Cupid's bow in straight manner, which runs parallel to the unaffected philtral ridge. Usually, small inlet incision is needed to lengthen the medial flap. On lateral flap, small triangle just above the cutaneous roll is used to prevent unesthetic shortening of upper lip. This allows better continuity of the Cupid's bow and ideal distribution of tension. Case presentation: As a modification to original method, orbicularis oris muscle overlapping suture is applied to make the elevated philtral ridge. Concomitant primary rhinoplasty also results in good esthetic outcome with symmetric nostrils and correction of alar web. As satisfactory results were obtained in three incomplete and one complete unilateral cleft lip patients, indicating Fisher's method can be useful in cleft lip surgery with functional and esthetic outcome. Conclusions: Clinically applied Fisher's method in unilateral cleft lip patients proved the effectiveness in improving the esthetic results with good symmetry. This method also applied with primary rhinoplasty.

Keywords

References

  1. Millard DR Jr (1964) Refinements in rotation-advancement cleft lip technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 33:26-38 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196401000-00003
  2. Fisher DM (2005) Unilateral cleft lip repair: an anatomical subunit approximation technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:61-71
  3. Fisher DM, Sommerlad BC (2011) Cleft lip, cleft palate, and velopharyngeal insufficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:342e-360e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268e1b
  4. Shi B, Sommerlad BC (eds) (2013) Cleft lip and palate primary repair. Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou
  5. Antonarakis GS, Fisher DM (2015) Presurgical unilateral cleft lip anthropometrics and the presence of dental anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 52:395-404 https://doi.org/10.1597/13-145
  6. Boorer CJ, Cho DC, Vijayasekaran VS, Fisher DM (2011) Presurgical unilateral cleft lip anthropometrics: implications for the choice of repair technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:774-780 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200aa2e
  7. Rogers CR, Meara JG, Mulliken JB (2014) The philtrum in cleft lip: review of anatomy and techniques for construction. J Craniofac Surg 25:9-13 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a2dce4
  8. Cakir B, Gideroglu K, Akan M, Taylan G, Akoz T (2009) Jack-like eversion by splitting the orbicularis oris muscle for reconstruction of the philtral column in secondary cleft lip. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 43:8-15 https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310802435767
  9. Cho BC (2004) New technique for correction of the microform cleft lip using vertical interdigitation of the orbicularis oris muscle through the intraoral incision. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1032-1041
  10. Fisher MD, Fisher DM, Marcus JR (2014) Correction of the cleft nasal deformity: from infancy to maturity. Clin Plast Surg 41:283-299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2014.01.002

Cited by

  1. Unilateral cleft lip repair: a comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques using quantitative (anthropometry) assessment vol.44, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.1.3