DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Maxillary resection for cancer, zygomatic implants insertion, and palatal repair as single-stage procedure: report of three cases

  • Salvatori, Pietro (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-H&N Surgery, Humanitas San Pio X Hospital) ;
  • Mincione, Antonio (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale Civile) ;
  • Rizzi, Lucio (Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ospedale Civile) ;
  • Costantini, Fabrizio (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-H&N Surgery, Humanitas San Pio X Hospital) ;
  • Bianchi, Alessandro (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-H&N Surgery, Humanitas San Pio X Hospital) ;
  • Grecchi, Emma (Department of Oral Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico) ;
  • Garagiola, Umberto (Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences Department, Maxillo-Facial and Odontostomatology Unit, Fondazione Ca Granda IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan) ;
  • Grecchi, Francesco (Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi)
  • Received : 2017.03.21
  • Accepted : 2017.04.01
  • Published : 2017.12.31

Abstract

Background: Oronasal/antral communication, loss of teeth and/or tooth-supporting bone, and facial contour deformity may occur as a consequence of maxillectomy for cancer. As a result, speaking, chewing, swallowing, and appearance are variably affected. The restoration is focused on rebuilding the oronasal wall, using either flaps (local or free) for primary closure, either prosthetic obturator. Postoperative radiotherapy surely postpones every dental procedure aimed to set fixed devices, often makes it difficult and risky, even unfeasible. Regular prosthesis, tooth-bearing obturator, and endosseous implants (in native and/or transplanted bone) are used in order to complete dental rehabilitation. Zygomatic implantology (ZI) is a valid, usually delayed, multi-staged procedure, either after having primarily closed the oronasal/antral communication or after left it untreated or amended with obturator. The present paper is an early report of a relatively new, one-stage approach for rehabilitation of patients after tumour resection, with palatal repair with loco-regional flaps and zygomatic implant insertion: supposed advantages are concentration of surgical procedures, reduced time of rehabilitation, and lowered patient discomfort. Cases presentation: We report three patients who underwent alveolo-maxillary resection for cancer and had the resulting oroantral communication directly closed with loco-regional flaps. Simultaneous zygomatic implant insertion was added, in view of granting the optimal dental rehabilitation. Conclusions: All surgical procedures were successful in terms of oroantral separation and implant survival. One patient had the fixed dental restoration just after 3 months, and the others had to receive postoperative radiotherapy; thus, rehabilitation timing was longer, as expected. We think this approach could improve the outcome in selected patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Aparicio C, Branemark PI, Keller EE, Olive J (1993) Reconstruction of the premaxilla with autogenous iliac bone in combination with osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:61-67
  2. Branemark P-I (1998) Surgery and fixture installation. Zygomaticus fixture clinical procedures (ed. 1). Nobel Biocare AB, Goteborg, p 1
  3. Malevez C, Daelemans P, Adriaenssens P, Durdu F (2003) Use of zygomatic implants to deal with resorbed posterior maxillae. Periodontol 2000(33):82-89
  4. Kahnberg KE, Henry PJ, Hirsch JM, Ohrnell LO, Andreasson L, Branemark PI et al (2007) Clinical evaluation of the zygoma implant: 3-year follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65(10):2033-2038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.013
  5. Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Branemark I, McAlpine JA (2007) A protocol for maxillary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont 20(5):521-531
  6. O'Connell JE, Cotter J, Kearns GJ (2011) Maxillary reconstruction using zygomatic implants: a report of two cases. J Ir Dent Assoc 57(3):146-155
  7. de Moraes EJ (2012) The buccal fat pad flap: an option to prevent and treat complications regarding complex zygomatic implant surgery. Preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27(4):905-910
  8. Nocini PF, D'Agostino A, Chiarini L, Trevisiol L, Procacci P (2014) Simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy and zygomatic implants placement with delayed prosthetic rehabilitation. J Craniofac Surg 25(3):1021-1024 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000742
  9. Bacchi A, Santos MB, Pimentel MJ, Nobilo MA, Consani RL (2014) Prosthetic improvement of pronounced buccally positioned zygomatic implants: a clinical report. J Prosthodont Aug 23(6):504-508 https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12148
  10. Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alandez J, Gonzalez-Martin O et al (2000) Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontol 66(1):41-58
  11. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2016) Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: an updated systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74(10):1949-1964 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.166
  12. Pellegrino G, Tarsitano A, Basile F, Pizzigallo A, Marchetti C (2015) Computer-aided rehabilitation of maxillary oncological defects using zygomatic implants: a defect-based classification. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 12:2446
  13. Salvatori P, Paradisi S, Calabrese L, Zani A, Cantu G, Cappiello J et al (2014) Patients' survival after free flap reconstructive surgery of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicentre study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 34(2):99-104
  14. Seok H, Kim MK, Kim SG (2016) Reconstruction of partial maxillectomy defect with a buccal fat pad flap and application of 4-hexylresorcinol: a case report. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(6):370-374 https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.6.370
  15. Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Schmelzeisen R (2000) Computer-assisted insertion of zygomatic implants (Branemark system) after extensive tumor surgery. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 4(5):292-295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s100060000211
  16. Tamura H, Sasaki K, Watahiki R (2000) Primary insertion of implants in the zygomatic bone following subtotal maxillectomy. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 41(1):21-24 https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.41.21
  17. Pia F, Aluffi P, Crespi MC, Arcuri F, Brucoli M, Benech A (2012) Intraoral transposition of pedicled temporalis muscle flap followed by zygomatic implant placement. J Craniofac Surg 23(5):e463-e465 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825b34f6
  18. Huang W, Wu Y, Zou D, Zhang Z, Zhang C, Sun J et al (2014) Long-term results for maxillary rehabilitation with dental implants after tumor resection. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 16(2):282-291 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00481.x
  19. D'Agostino A, Procacci P, Ferrari F, Trevisiol L, Nocini PF (2013) Zygoma implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient after subtotal bilateral maxillectomy. J Craniofac Surg 24(2):159-162 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827c836e
  20. Ugurlu F, Yildiz C, Sener BC, Sertgoz A (2013) Rehabilitation of posterior maxilla with zygomatic and dental implant after tumor resection: a case report. Case Rep Dent 2013:930345
  21. El-Sayed WM, Gad MA, Medra AM (2014) Prosthodontic management of maxillectomy patients with dental implants in residual zygomatic bone: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 27(6):534-540 https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3598
  22. Ozaki H, Ishikawa S, Kitabatake K, Yusa K, Sakurai H, Iino M (2016) Functional and aesthetic rehabilitation with maxillary prosthesis supported by two zygomatic implants for maxillary defect resulting from cancer ablative surgery: a case report/technique article. Odontology 104(2):233-238 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-015-0222-5
  23. Salvatori P, Podrecca S, Cantu G, Bosco R, Fallahdar D, Molinari R (2001) Prosthetic rehabilitation with endosseous implants in fibular free flaps reconstructed mandibles. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 21(5):300-305
  24. Garagiola U, Grigolato R, Soldo R, Bacchini M, Bassi G, De Nardi S et al (2016) Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone reconstruction in jawbone atrophy: a systematic review and case report. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 38:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0048-7
  25. Noh K, Pae A, Lee JW, Kwon YD (2016) Fabricating a tooth- and implant-supported maxillary obturator for a patient after maxillectomy with computer-guided surgery and CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 115(5):637-642 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.015
  26. Chen X, Wu Y, Wang C (2011) Application of a surgical navigation system in the rehabilitation of maxillary defects using zygoma implants: report of one case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26(5):e29-e34
  27. Takamaru N, Nagai H, Ohe G, Tamatani T, Sumida K, Kitamura S, Miyamoto Y (2016) Measurement of the zygomatic bone and pilot hole technique for safer insertion of zygomaticus implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(1):104-109 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.015

Cited by

  1. Zygomatic implant‐based rehabilitation for patients with maxillary and mid‐facial oncology defects: A review vol.27, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13305