메타세콰이어, 카담, 물푸레나무 세포내강의 액체이동

Capillary Flow in Different Cells of Metasequoia glyptostroboides, Anthocephalus cadamba, and Fraxinus rhynchophylla

  • 전수경 (강원대학교 산림바이오소재공학과)
  • Chun, Su Kyoung (Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.02
  • 심사 : 2018.01.12
  • 발행 : 2018.01.25

초록

A study was carried out to observe the 1% aqueous safranine solution flow speed in longitudinal and radial directions of softwood Metasequoia glyptostroboides, diffuse-porous wood Anthocephalus cadamba and ring-porouswood Fraxinus rhynchophylla. In radial direction, ray cells and in longitudinal direction, tracheids, vessel and wood fiber were considered for the measurement of liquid penetration speed at less than 12% moisture contents (MC). The length, lumen diameter, pit diameter, end wall pit diameter and the numbers of end wall pits determined for the flow rate. The liquid flow in the those cells was captured via video and the capillary flow rate in the ones were measured. Vessel in hardwood species and tracheids in softwood was found to facilitate prime role in longitudinal penetration. Anatomical features like the length and diameter, end-wall pit numbers of ray parenchyma were found also responsible fluid flow differences. On the other hand, vessel and fiber structure affected the longitudinal flow of liquids. Therefore, the average liquid penetration depth in longitudinal tracheids of Metasequoia glyptostroboides was found the highest among all cells considered in Anthocephalus cadamba and Fraxinus rhynchophylla In radial direction, ray parenchyma of Metasequoia glyptostroboides was found the highest depth and the one of Fraxinus rhynchophylla was the lowest. The solution was penetrated lowest depth in the wood fiber of Fraxinus rhynchophylla. The large vessel of Fraxinus rhynchophylla was found the lowest depth among the vessels. The solutin was penetrated to the wood fiber of Anthocephalus cadamba higher than the one of Fraxinus rhynchophylla.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 전수경. 2015. 은행나무, 감나무, 가중나무 세포내강의 액체이동. 한국가구학회지 Vol. 26. No. 2: 179-185.
  2. Ahmed, S. A., S. H. Chong, S. K. Chun, and B. S. Park. 2006. Ray parenchyma and ray tracheid structure of four Korean pine wood species. J Korea Furniture Society 17(4): 101-107.
  3. Ahmed, S. A. and S. K. Chun. 2009. Observation of liquid permeability related to anatomical characteristics in Samaneasaman. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33(2): 155-163.
  4. Banks, W. B. 1970. Some factors affecting the permeability of Scots pine and Norway spruce. Journal of Wood Science .5: 10-17.
  5. Bolton, A. J. 1988. A re-examination of some deviations from Darcy's Law in coniferous wood. Wood Science and Technology 22: 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353321
  6. Bolton, A. J. and J. A. Petty. 1978. A model describing axial flow of liquid through conifer wood. Wood Science and Technology 12: 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390009
  7. Erickson, H. D. (1970) Permeability of southern pine wood-A review. Journal of Wood Science 2(3): 149-158.
  8. Erickson, H. D. and J. J. Balatinecz. 1964. Liquid flow paths into wood using polymerization techniques: Douglas-fir and styrene. Forest Products Journal 14: 293-299.
  9. Flynn, K. A. (1995) A review of the permeability, fluid flow, and anatomy of spruce (Piceaspp.). Wood and Fiber Science 27: 278-284.
  10. Fujii, T., S. J. Lee, N. Kuroda, and Y. Suzuki. 2001. Conductive function of intervessel pits through a growth ring boundary of Machilusthunbergii. IAWA Journal 22(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-90000264
  11. Hansmann, C., W. Gindl, R. Wimmer, and A. Teischinger. 2002. Permeability of wood: A review. Wood Research 47: 1-16.
  12. Keith, C. T. and G. Chauret. 1988. Anatomical studies of CCA penetration associated with conventional (tooth) and with micro (needle) incising. Wood and Fiber Science 20: 197-208.
  13. Liese, W. and J. Bauch. 1967. On anatomical causes of the refractory behaviour of spruce and Douglas fir. Journal of Wood Science 19: 3-14.
  14. Lihra, T., A. Cloutier, and S. Y. Zhang. 2000. Longitudinal and transverse permeability of Balsam fir wetwood and normal heartwood. Wood and Fiber Science 32(2): 164-178.
  15. Leal, S., V. B. Sousa, and H. Pereira. 2007. Radial variation of vessel size and distribution in cork oak wood (QuercussuberL.) Wood Science and Technology 41: 339-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-006-0112-7
  16. Olsson, T., M. Megnis, J. Varna, and H. Lindberg. 2001. Study of the transverse liquid flow paths in pine and spruce using scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Wood Science 47: 282-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00766714
  17. Owoyemi, J. M. and J. O. Kayode. 2008. Effect of incision on preservative capacity of Gmelinaarboreawood. Biotechnology 7: 351-353. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2008.351.353
  18. Petty, J. A. 1970. Permeability and structure of the wood of Sitkaspruce. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 175: 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1970.0016
  19. Wardrop, A. B. and G. W. Davies. 1961. Morphological factors relating to the penetration of liquids into wood. Holzforschung 15: 130-141.
  20. Watanabe, U., Y. Imamura, and I. Iida. 1998. Liquid penetration of precompressed wood VI: Anatomical characterization of pit fractures. Journal of Wood Science 44: 158-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00526263
  21. Wheeler, E. A. 1982. Ultrastructural characteristics of red maple (AcerrubrumL.) wood. Wood Fiber 14(1): 43-53.