벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제13권1호
  • /
  • Pages.119-129
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

공급자 관점에서 흡수역량과 지식보호성향이 신제품개발 성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 실증적 연구

An Empirical Study on the Effects of Absorption Capacity and Knowledge Protectiveness on New Product Development Performance from a Supplier Perspective

  • 투고 : 2018.01.08
  • 심사 : 2018.02.28
  • 발행 : 2018.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

어느 때보다도 불확실해진 시장환경과 더욱더 복잡해지는 소비자의 요구는 신제품 개발의 중요성을 증대시키고 있다. 하지만, 점차 좁아지는 기술격차와 빨라지는 제품의 수명주기는 기업들로 하여금 외부조직과 연합을 통해 부족한 지식을 보완하는 현상을 가져왔다. 그러나 이러한 현상은 다른 조직과 지식의 교환과 조합이란 새로운 문제를 부각시키게 되었다. 신제품을 개발하기 위한 지식의 교환과 조합을 통해 가치있는 지식을 만들기 위해서는 지식 수령자의 흡수역량이 중요하게 고려되어야 하지만, 동시에 지식 전달자의 특징인 지식보호성향도 놓쳐서는 안된다. 하지만 이러한 요소를 동시에 고려한 연구는 매우 제한적이었다. 본 연구는 신제품 공동개발 과정에서 공급자의 흡수역량과 구매자의 지식보호성향이 신제품 개발성과에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보았다. 더불어 공급자의 흡수역량과 구매자의 지식보호성향의 상호작용효과에 대해서도 연구하였다. 이를 위해 신제품 공동개발이 자주 발생하는 자동차산업, 전자산업, 방위산업을 대상으로 자료를 수집하였으며 조절회귀분석으로 통계적 검증을 실시하였다. 연구결과 공급자의 흡수역량은 신제품 개발성과와 긍정정 관계가 있었으며, 구매자의 지식보호성향은 신제품 개발성과와 부정적 관계가 있는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 아울러 공급자의 흡수역량과 구매자의 지식보호성향이 신제품 개발결과에 상호작용 효과를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 신제품 공동개발 시 공급자의 흡수역량이 중요한 요소로 작용하지만, 우수한 흡수역량을 가진 공급자라도 구매자가 지식 전달에 부정적인 자세를 가질 경우 신제품 개발성과에 부정적 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 시사한다.

Companies' efforts to secure and sustain a competitive advantage in the market may also appear in the form of new product development. This has increased the importance of leveraging knowledge from other companies in a global competition that is accelerating with an accelerating product life cycle and the development of transportation and communications. In order to create valuable knowledge through the exchange and combination of knowledge, the absorptive capacity of the recipient of the knowledge should be considered as important, but also the knowledge protection tendency, which is characteristic of the knowledge transferor, should be considered. However, studies that considered these factors at the same time were very limited. This study examines the effect of suppliers 'absorptive capacity and buyer' s knowledge protection on new product development performance during the joint development of new products. In addition, we investigated the interaction effect between supplier's absorption capacity and buyer's knowledge protection tendency. For this purpose, data were collected for automobile industry, electronics industry and defense industry, where joint development of new products occurred frequently, and statistical verification was performed by regression analysis. The results showed that the absorptive capacity of the supplier was positively correlated with the performance of the new product development, and the buyer 's knowledge protection tendency had a negative relationship with the new product development performance. In addition, the absorptive capacity of the supplier and the buyer 's knowledge protection tendency have an interaction effect on the new product development result. These results suggest that suppliers' absorption capacity is an important factor in the joint development of new products, but suppliers with superior absorption capacity may have a negative impact on new product development performance if buyers have a negative attitude toward knowledge transfer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abecassis-Moedas, C., & Mahmoud-Jouini, S. B.(2008). Absorptive Capacity and Source-Recipient Complementarity in Designing New Products: An Empirically Derived Framework, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00315.x
  2. Ahn, B. M.(2015). World top R & D investment companies Status. KISTEP statistic brief. 28.
  3. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R.(2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
  4. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G.(1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L.(2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited, Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416096
  6. Boyer, K. K., Ward, P. T., & Leong, G. K.(1996). Approaches to the factory of the future: An empirical taxonomy, Journal of Operations Management, 14(4). 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(96)00093-9
  7. Brown, S. A.(1997). Knowledge, communication, and progressive use of information technology, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota.
  8. Carey, S., Lawson, B., & Krause, D. R.(2011). Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer- supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 29(4), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.08.003
  9. Chen, Y., Lin, M. J., & Chang, C.(2009) The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets, Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.003
  10. Chesbrough, H. W.(2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  11. Clark, K. B.(1989). Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development, Management Science, 35(10), 1247-1263. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.10.1247
  12. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D.(1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  13. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H.(1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
  14. Fliess, S., & Becker, U.(2006). Supplier integration: controlling of co-development processes, Industrial Marketing Management, 35(1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.07.004
  15. Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F.(1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  16. Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C.(2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances, Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00421.x
  17. Guy, S. P., & Dale, B. G.(1993). The Role of Purchasing in Design: A Study in the British Defense Industry, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 29(3), 27-31.
  18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L.(2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  19. Hong, K. S.(2014). The impact of social capital on knowledge sharing and innovation product development performance in buyer-supplier relationships: The role of absorptive capacity and partnership, Journal of Product Research, 32(3), 21-36.
  20. Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W.(2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?, Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106
  21. Jung, D. D.(2017). An Exploratory Study on the Improvement of Small and Medium Enterprises Priority System that Hinders Technology Transfer, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 87-94.
  22. Jung, D. H., & Koh, G. H.(2013). The Effect of Strategy Orientation and NPD Performance on Manufacturing Firm: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Order of Market Entry, Journal of Product Research, 31(2), 71-91.
  23. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H.(2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::AID-SMJ95>3.0.CO;2-Y
  24. Kim, J. D.(2017). Effect SCM Capacity Factor of Small and Medium-Sized Supplier on Operational Performance: Focused on Moderating Effect of Demand Uncertainty, Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(5), 117-126.
  25. Kogut, B., & Zander, U.(1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and replication of technology, Organization Science, 3(1), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383
  26. Kotabe, M., Jiang, C. X., & Murray, J. Y.(2011). Managerial ties, knowledge acquisition, realized absorptive capacity and new product market performance of emerging multinational companies: A case of China, Journal of World Business, 46(2), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.05.005
  27. Koufteros, X. A., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, K.(2007). "Black-box" and "gray-box" supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size, Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 847-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.009
  28. Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., & Pathak, S.(2006). The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 833-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527456
  29. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M.(1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning, Strategic Management Journal. 19(5), 461-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::AID-SMJ953>3.0.CO;2-L
  30. Liebeskind, J. P.(1996). Knowledge, strategy, and theory of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171109
  31. Madhok, A., & Tallman, S. B.(1998). Resources, transactions and rents: managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships, Organization Science, 9(3), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.9.3.326
  32. March, J.(1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organizational Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  33. Mclvor, R., & Humphreys, P.(2004). Early Supplier involvement in the design process: lessons from the electronics industry, Omega, 32(3), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2003.09.005
  34. Meeus, M. T., Oerlemans, L. A., & Hage, J.(2001). Patterns of interactive learning in a high-tech region. Organization Studies, 22(1), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084060102200106
  35. Moon, J. Y.(2014). The Effect of Competency Factors of Small and Medium Suppliers on Purchasing Firm's Dependency and Will to Maintain Transactions. Journal of Product Research, 32(2), 1-17.
  36. Moran, P., & Ghosal, S.(1996). Value creation by firms, Academy of Management Proceedings, 3(1), 35-39.
  37. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S.(1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171108
  38. Norman, P. M.(2002). Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances, resource and relational characteristics, Journal of High Technology Management Research. 13(2), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00050-0
  39. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N.(2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  40. Primo, M. A., & Amundson, S. D.(2002). An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes, Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00080-8
  41. Quintas, P., Lefrere, P., & Jones, G.(1997). Knowledge management: A strategic agenda, Long Range Planning, 30(3), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90252-1
  42. Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V.(1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development, Journal of Product Innovation Management. 14(3), 190-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1430190
  43. Simonin, B. L.(1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal, 20(3), 595-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5
  44. Simonin, B. L.(2004). An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 407-427. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400091
  45. Stock, G., Greis, N., & Fischer, W. A.(2001). Absorptive capacity and new product development, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00040-7
  46. Szulanski, G.(1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
  47. Takeishi, A.(2001). Bridging inter-and intra-firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development, Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 403-433. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.164
  48. Tsai, W.(2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443
  49. Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Sharkey, T. W.(2006). Absorptive capacity: Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices, Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 692-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.004
  50. Young, A.(2015), 12, March. Toyota Electric RAV4 recall. International Business Times. Retrived from http://www.ibtimes.com.
  51. Zahra, S., & Geoge, G.(2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension, Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995