DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on a Korean-Translated Version of the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire (PVQ)

Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire의 국내적용을 위한 번역연구

  • 라대엽 (솔파란 아동연구소) ;
  • 장기연 (우송대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 공명자 (우송대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이선욱 (대구대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.13
  • Accepted : 2018.10.29
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Objective : This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of Korean version of Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire (PVQ-K) using classical test theory. Methods : For the translation of Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire (PVQ), as recommended in the literature, four-stage translation method was used. For the psychometric properties of Korean version of the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire (PVQ-K), internal consistency reliability, content validity, and construct validity of the test using the known groups method and convergent and divergent methods were examined. For the recruitment of participants, a convenience sampling method is used. Participants of this study were 10 children with neuro-developmental disabilities hospitalized two different rehabilitations center and 10 children with typical development living in Daejeon, South Korea. All 20 participants were in aged from two to five years. Results : In terms of the content validity index, it was over 0.78, confirmed by nine experts of children development. PVQ-K successfully discriminated the scores of children with typical development from those with neurodevelopmental disabilities (p < .05). It is found that there is significant correlations between achievement stage of PVQ-K and the Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants & Children (K-DTS)(.652 ~ .799 for subcategory, .706 for total scale). The internal consistency was .944 (Cronbach's ${\alpha}$). In qualitative content analysis, it was examined that how Korean children behave and respond in the environment, and how children's volition was strengthened or weakened by the environment. Conclusion : The results propose that PVQ-K can be a useful occupation-focused measure. This study recommend further study on PVQ-K with larger samples combined with the item-response theory approach.

목적 : 본 연구는 아동용 작업의지 측정도구(Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire; PVQ)을 국내에서 사용하기 위해 4단계 번역과정을 실시하고, 이에 따른 타당도 및 신뢰도검증, 질적 해석을 통한 국내 적용가능성 및 방향성의 사전연구를 실시하는 것이다. 연구방법 : 연구대상자는 대전에 거주하고 있는 만 2세~5세의 일반아동 10명과 신경발달장애 아동 10명으로 총 20명이 대상이며, 편의 표본 추출법이 사용되었다. 번역과정은 번역, 역번역 검증, 이해도 검증 및 번역검증위원회 과정을 거쳤다. 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증을 위해 내용타당도, 판별타당도, 수렴타당도, 내적일치도, 질적 해석을 진행하였다. 결과 : 내용타당도를 알아보기 위한 문항 적합도에서 .78이상의 결과가 나타났으며, 판별타당도에서 일반아동그룹의 총점이 통계적으로 높았다(p<.05). 수렴타당도는 한국판 아동용 작업의지 측정도구(Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire-Korean version; PVQ-K)의 성취영역과 한국 영유아 발달선별검사(Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants & Children; K-DST)(하위 범주 간 상관관계 .652 ~ .799, 총점 .706)사이에 통계적으로 유의한 결과가 나타났다. 모든 항목에 대한 내적일치도(Cronbach's ${\alpha}$)는 .944로 나타났다. 질적 해석을 통해 아동이 환경에서 어떻게 행동하고 반응하는지 관찰하고 무엇에 의해 작업의지가 강화되거나 약화되는지를 알아보았다. 결론 : 본 연구는 한국판 아동용 작업의지 측정도구가 작업-초점 측정에 유용하게 사용될 수 있다는 초기 근거를 제공하며, 추후 문항반응 이론(item-response theory) 및 더 큰 표본을 통한 한국판 아동용 작업의지 측정도구의 추가 개발이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2014). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Suppl. 1), S1-S48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.682006
  2. Andersen, S. P. (1998). Using the pediatric volitional questionnaire to assess children with disabilities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Illinois.
  3. Andersen, S., Kielhofner, G., & Lai, J. S. (2005). An examination of the measurement properties of the pediatric volitional questionnaire. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25(1-2), 39- 57. https://doi.org/10.1080/J006v25n01_04
  4. Ashby, S., & Chandler, B. (2010). An exploratory study of the occupation-focused models included in occupational therapy professional education programmes. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(12), 616-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.4276/030802210X12918167234325
  5. Basu, S., Kafkes, A., Schatz, R., Kiraly, A., & Kielhofner, G. (2008). A user's manual for the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire: Version2.1. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
  6. Baum, C. M., & Christiansen, C. H. (2005). Person-environment-occupation-performance: An occupation-based framework for practice. In C. H. Christiansen, C. M. Baum, & J. Bass-Haugen (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being (3rd ed.). Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated.
  7. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol13/iss4/2.
  8. Colaianni, D., & Provident, I. (2010). The benefits of and challenges to the use of occupation in hand therapy. Occupational Therapy in Healthcare, 24(2), 130-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07380570903349378
  9. Colon, H., & Haertlein, C. (2002). Spanish translation of the role checklist. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 586-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.586
  10. Del Greco, L., Walop, W., & Eastridge, L. (1987). Questionnaire development: 3. Translation. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 136(8), 817-818. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1492131/
  11. Fidler, G., & Fidler, J. (1983). Doing and becoming: The occupational therapy experience. In G. Kielhofner (Ed.), Health through occupation: Theory and practice in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
  12. Fisher, A. G. (2013). Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(3), 162-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2012.754492
  13. Fleming-Castaldy, R. P. (Ed.). (2014). Perspectives for occupation-based practice: Foundation and future of occupational therapy (3rd ed.). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press.
  14. Haymes, S. A., Johnston, A. W., & Heyes, A. D. (2001). The development of the Melbourne low-vision ADL index: A measure of vision disability. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 42(6), 1215-1225. Retrieved from https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2162233
  15. Hooper, B. (2006). Beyond active learning: A case study of teaching practices in an occupation-centered curriculum. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(5), 551-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.60.5.551
  16. Hwang, J. E. (2010). Construct validation of the Health Enhancement Lifestyle Profile (HELP) with quality of life among community-dwelling older adults. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 28(2), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.3109 /02703181003637559 https://doi.org/10.3109/02703181003637559
  17. Kielhofner, G. (Ed.). (2008). Model of human occupation: Theory and application (4th ed.) Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  18. Kielhofner, G., & Burke, J. P. (1980). A model of human occupation, Part 1. Conceptual framework and content. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34(9), 572-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.34.9.572
  19. Kiraly-Alvarez, A. (2015). Assessing volition in pediatrics: Using the Volitional Questionnaire and the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 3(3), 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1176
  20. The Korean Pediatric Society, Ministry of Health and Welfare, & Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). User manual for the Korean Developmental Screening Test for Infants & Children - 1st volume. Cheongju, Korea: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
  21. Law, M. (2005). Appendix E-outcome measures rating form guidelines. In M. Law, C. Baum, & W. Dunn (Eds.), Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 396-409). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
  22. Lee, J. (2010). Achieving best practice: A review of evidence linked to occupation-focused practice models. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 24(3), 206-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2010.483270
  23. Lee, S. W., Taylor, R., Kielhofner, G., & Fisher, G. (2008). Theory use in practice: A national survey of therapists who use the Model of Human Occupation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(1), 106. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/231969520?accountid=10116 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.1.106
  24. Liu, L. T., Pan, A. W., Chung, L., Gau, S. S. F., Kramer, J., & Lai, J. S. (2013). Reliability and validity of the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire-Chinese Version. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(1), 99-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1052
  25. Mulligan, S., White, B. P., & Arthanat, S. (2014). An examination of occupation-based, clientcentered, evidence-based occupational therapy practices in New Hampshire. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 34(2), 106-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20140226-01
  26. Nelson, D. L. (1988). Occupation: Form and performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(10), 633-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.42.10.633
  27. Polatajko, H. J., & Davis, J. A. (2012). Advancing occupation-based practice: Interpreting the rhetoric. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 259-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2012.79.5.1
  28. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
  29. Reid, D. (2005). Correlation of the Pediatric Volitional Questionnaire with the Test of Playfulness in a virtual environment: The power of engagement. Early Child Development and Care, 175(2), 153-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000230366
  30. Rodger, S., & Kennedy-Behr, A. (2017). Occupation-centred practice with children: A practical guide for occupational therapists. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  31. Sechrest, L., Fay, T. L., & Zaidi, S. H. (1972). Problems of translation in cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 3(1), 41-56. http://doi.org/10.1177/002202217200300103
  32. Sharrott, G. W., & Cooper-Fraps, C. (1986). Theories of motivation in occupational therapy: An overview. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(4), 249-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.4.249
  33. Taylor, R. R. (2017). Kielhofner's Model of Human Occupation: Theory and application. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.
  34. Taylor, R. R., Kielhofner, G., Smith, C., Butler, S., Cahill, S. M., Ciukaj, M. D., et al. (2009). Volitional change in children with autism: A single-case design study of the impact of hippotherapy on motivation. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 25(2), 192-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01642120902859287
  35. Townsend, E. A., & Polatajko, H. J. (2007). Enabling occupation II: Advancing an occupational therapy vision for health, wellbeing, and justice through occupation. Ottawa, Ontario: CAOT Publications.
  36. Wicks, A. (2012, May 29). Identifying occupational needs in the community. Seminar presented at Umea University, Department of Occupational Therapy, Sweden.
  37. Wilcock, A. A., & Townsend, E. A. (2014). Occupational justice. In H. S. Willard, & B. A. B. Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 541-552). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  38. Wong, S. R., & Fisher, G. (2015). Comparing and using occupation-focused models. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29(3), 297-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2015.1010130.
  39. World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2012). Definition of occupational therapy. Retrieved from http://www.wfot.org/AboutUs/AboutOccu pationalTherapy/DefinitionofOccupationalTherapy.aspx
  40. World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization.
  41. World Health Organization. (2007). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/
  42. Yerxa, E. J. (1998). Occupation: The keystone of a curriculum for a self-defined profession. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(5), 365-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.52.5.365