DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of forecasting performance of time series models for the wholesale price of dried red peppers: focused on ARX and EGARCH

  • Received : 2018.05.08
  • Accepted : 2018.07.24
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Dried red peppers are a staple agricultural product used in Korean cuisine and as such, are an important aspect of agricultural producers' income. Correctly forecasting both their supply and demand situations and price is very important in terms of the producers' income and consumer price stability. The primary objective of this study was to compare the performance of time series forecasting models for dried red peppers in Korea. In this study, three models (an autoregressive model with exogenous variables [ARX], AR-exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity [EGARCH], and ARX-EGARCH) are presented for forecasting the wholesale price of dried red peppers. As a result of the analysis, it was shown that the ARX model and ARX-EGARCH model, each of which adopt both the rolling window and the adding approach and use the agricultural cooperatives price as the exogenous variable, showed a better forecasting performance compared to the autoregressive model (AR)-EGARCH model. Based on the estimation methods and results, there was no significant difference in the accuracy of the estimation between the rolling window and adding approach. In the case of dried red peppers, there is limitation in building the price forecasting models with a market-structured approach. In this regard, estimating a forecasting model using only price data and identifying the forecast performance can be expected to complement the current pricing forecast model which relies on market shipments.

Keywords

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Wholesale price of dried red pepper (1996.1 - 2107. 12).

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Marketing channel of domestic fried red pepper (aT KAMIS, 2018). The numbers in the graph are the shares (%) of each section and sales root.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Log diferenced (1st) prices.

Fig. 1. Structure of Korea Rural Economic Institute (KREI)’s monthly structural model for dried red pepper (Kim et al., 2013).

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0001.png 이미지

Table 1. Annual supply situation of dried red pepper in Korea.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0002.png 이미지

Table 2. Representative statistics of wholesale prices in the analysis: 2010. 08 - 2016. 12 (unit: won/600 g).

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0003.png 이미지

Table 3. Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root test results of wholesale price.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0004.png 이미지

Table 4. Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) unit root test results of Nonghyup price.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0005.png 이미지

Table 5. Causality test results.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0006.png 이미지

Table 6. ARMA model selection criteria table (1st diferenced).

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0007.png 이미지

Table 7. Estimates of time series forecasting models for wholesale price.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0008.png 이미지

Table 8. Out-of-sample tests results

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0009.png 이미지

Table 9. Ex-Post forecasting error test results of the KREI’s monthly structural model.

CNNSA3_2018_v45n4_859_t0010.png 이미지

References

  1. Cho JH, Lee HS. 2011. Development of a mid-term preceding observation model for radish. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 38:571-581. [in Korean]
  2. Han SH, Lee JM, Park MS, Park YK, Jang SJ. 2010. KREI Monthly Outlook Model. M102. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  3. Hwang ES, Ahn BI. 2012. Analyses on the characteristics of the trend and volatility of the major fruits and vegetables. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 53:1-21. [in Korean]
  4. Lee HY, Yeo MS, Hong SJ. 2017. Comparison of time series forecasting models in garlic's wholesale price. Journal of Rural Development 40:55-73. [in Korean]
  5. Kim BS. 2005. A comparison of forecasting performance of the application models for forecasting of vegetable prices. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 46:89-113. [in Korean]
  6. Kim BS, Park MS, Cho JH, Kim TK. 2010. A demand and supply model of agricultural and livestock products for midterm outlook. M103. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  7. Kim IS, Chung GY, Byeon AR. 2014. Monthly structural models of Korean onion and green onion markets. N2014-34. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  8. Kim IS, Kim L, Byun SY, Kim HY. 2013. Monthly structural models of Korean dried pepper and garlic markets. N2013-34. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  9. Kim SD, Yang SR. 2016. A study on the marketing channels onto Garak agricultural market -Auction system vs. unlisted transaction-. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 33:19-45. [in Korean]
  10. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs). 2018. 2018 major statistics on agriculture, food and rural affairs. MAFRA, Sejong, Korea. [in Korean]
  11. Nelson DB. 1991. Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59:347-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
  12. Park JY, Park YG. 2013. The development of Chinese cabbage and radish forecast models. M125. Korea Rural Economic Institute, Naju, Korea. [in Korean]
  13. Yoo DI. 2016. Developing vegetable price forecasting model with climate factors. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 57:1-24. [in Korean]
  14. aT KAMIS. KAMIS. Accessed in http://www.kamis.or.kr on 10 March 2018.