융합정보논문지 (Journal of Convergence for Information Technology)

중소기업융합학회 (Convergence Society for SMB)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학생의 생활만족도에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구 -성격특성, 자기관리, 진로태도를 중심으로-

A Study on Effects of the Level of Campus Life Satisfaction - Focused on personality traits, self-management, career attitude -

  • Kim, Kyung-Wha (Department of Health and Welfare for the Elderly, Daegu Hanny University) ;
  • Lee, Cheol-in (Department of Health Administration, Munkyung College)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.22
  • 심사 : 2018.04.20
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 연구목적은 대학생을 대상으로 일반적인 특성에 따라 진로태도성숙도, 자기관리 그리고 대학생활만족도를 알아보기 위함이다. 대구, 경북에 위치한 대학 중 403명을 연구 대상으로 일반적인 특성과 성격특성, 진로 태도 및 자신의 관리 등 요인을 중심으로 위계적 다중회귀분석 방법을 실시 분석하였다. 그 결과, 대학생활만족도의 빈도와 일반적 특성에 비추어볼때, 전체 대학생활만족도는 3.29점으로 5점 만점 중 보통이상을 보였고, 신입생들이 2학년 이상의 학생들보다 높았다. 또한 성격이 개방적일수록 성실성이 높으며, 자기 관리는 생활 관리를 잘하는 학생일수록 고유 행동관리와 신체관리를 잘 하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 고학년이 저학년보다 성격은 친화성이 적고, 준비성이 많은 학생들이 진로태도성숙도의 대학생활에 만족도가 높게 나타났으며 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 친화적 특성을 가진 학생들이 진로태도 성숙도에서 준비를 잘 할 수 있고, 대학생활만족도를 높일 수 있도록 학생을 잘 지도 하는 것이 중요하다.

The purpose of this study is to examine career maturity, self - management, and university life satisfaction according to general characteristics of college students. 403 students from Daegu and Gyeongbuk provinces were analyzed and analyzed by hierarchical multiple regression analysis focusing on factors such as general characteristics, personality traits, career attitude and self - management. As a result, according to the frequency and general characteristics of university life satisfaction, overall university life satisfaction was 3.29 out of 5 out of 5, and fresh students were higher than second year students. Also, the more open the personality, the higher the sincerity. The more self - management is the student who manage the life, the better the proper behavior management and physical management. In addition, students with a lower level of personality and a higher degree of readiness were more satisfied with college life than attitudes toward career maturity than those with lower grades. Based on these results, students with friendly characteristics can prepare well in career attitude maturity It is important to guide students well so that they can improve their college life satisfaction.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. N. Y. Kim. (2011). A Study on the Relationship between College Students Stress, Social Support, and College Life Satisfaction. Master's Thesis, Konkuk University Graduate School, Seoul.
  2. Y. J. Kim. (2002). The Function of College Counseling Center and Necessity of Introduction of School Social Work. Graduate School of Kyungsung University. Busan.
  3. B. M. Kang. (2003). Psychological Stress Factors and Coping Strategies of College Students: Focusing on Differences in Gender, Grade, and Series. Master Thesis. Graduate School of Education, Kunkuk University. Seoul.
  4. J. Y. Lee. (2009). A Study on College Life Satisfaction with College Students. Master 's Thesis, Graduate School of Education, Kanto National University. Japan.
  5. Y. K. Cho. (2014). The effect of personality strength and utilization on college students 'career attitude maturity, career preparation behavior, and university life satisfaction. Master' s thesis, Catholic University graduate school, oul.
  6. H. K. Lee. (2000). The Relationship between College Life Satisfaction and Mental Health in College Students. Master's Thesis, Kongju National University, Kongju.
  7. S. H. Jo. (2006). A Study on the Relationship between College Activity and Social Support, Academic Adjustment and College Life Satisfaction. Master's Thesis. Yonsei University Graduate Schoo, Seoul.
  8. A. W. Astin. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
  9. J. P. Lee. (2012). A Study on the Effects of College Mentoring System on Self-Efficacy and Satisfaction with College Life. Master's Thesis. Daejeon University, Daejeon.
  10. H. H. Kelley. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American psychologist, 28(2), 107-128. DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-1489-3_5
  11. Y. S. Park. (2010). A Study on Satisfaction Factors of University Education Service. Graduate School of KyungHee University, Seoul.
  12. V. H. Vroom. (1964). Workn and Motivation. New York: John Willey & Sons.
  13. E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham. (1990). A thepry of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.
  14. R. Hoppock. (1935). Job satisfaction. Oxford, England: Harper.
  15. D. R. Lee & S. S. Lee. (2002). Factors Affecting Student Life Satisfaction: Focused on Customer Satisfaction. Research in Industrial Management, 15, 1-24.
  16. E. S. Han. (2007). A Study on the Satisfaction of School Life in College Students. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Education, Suwon National University, Suwon.
  17. Y. K. Hwang. (2013). The Relationship between Self Efficacy, University Life Satisfaction Stress Perception and Stress Coping Strategies. Master 's Thesis. University of InJae, InJae.
  18. J. M. Ha. (2014). Analysis of College Life Satisfaction of College Students in Private Universities. Master's Thesis, Graduate School of Education, Kumho University, Gumi.
  19. S. S. Park. (2009). An Exploratory Study on the Effects of Big Five Personality Types on College Students' Career Behavior. Master's Thesis. Chungbuk National University Graduate School of Management, Cheongju.
  20. J. M. La. (2012). The Effects of Personality Characteristics of Dance Major Students on Place Management and Academic Adjustment. Master's thesis. Dankook University graduate school, Seoul.
  21. H. S. Lee & J. H. Lim. (2005). SPSS 12.0 Manual Statistical Analysis and Explanation. Seoul: Bobmunsa.